I see 3 cables running to the QX. One of them is green and in other photos seems to be attached to a metal probe that is inserted into the root of the hose carrying water outflow. I assume it is intended to end in a thermocouple.
The green cable belongs to a thermometer, which delivers data for a receiver unit, that is connected via USB to the notebook.
Can it be that since Rossi already said that the EcatQX produces its own electricity, this cooling is needed because the QX gives back a current to the control unit which then needs to be dissipated as heat?
If that were the case, a simple, adequately sized consumer (eg, a simple light bulb) could be integrated into the circuit to eliminate excess electricity produced by the reactor. It would have had the additional effect of giving the viewer of this experiment a 'light', but here, in the end, only endless darkness remains.
The main problem I have is that in this experiment it is completely unnecessary to integrate a comparatively huge control unit that can manage hundreds or even thousands of E-Cat QX!
Whatever electronics is needed to run the reactor with power and control signals must at the end pass through two thin cables.
On the reactor itself no further control electronics can be seen, which means that the necessary voltage and the control signal must be done alone on these thin current-carrying cable, which are connected by a simple 6.3 mm crimp connector.
As can be seen during the experiment on the oscilloscope, the glow plugs or spark plugs installed in the reactor receive a simple and continuous signal (4 seconds on, 4 seconds off, with a constant frequency waveform).
Nobody can tell me that in order to provide such a simple control signal, one would need a controller including control electronics whose dimensions could operate an entire space station. Additional for this purpose, this controller should consume 60 watts, which then need their own cooling?
What kind of nonsense is that supposed to be?
The hope that this E-Cat QX is a revolutionary technology that can solve the energy problems of humanity, can basically by buried! If, after more than 6 long years, such a joke is presented as a sigma 5 apparatus and somebody has to fumble unworthily under some boxes, and then afterwards meet in backrooms with investors, then unfortunately that shows only zero substance.
Although I am not sure, it appears to me that you are turning against Rossi? If so, that surprises me as you have been one of his biggest supporters.
I stick to facts, that lowers blood pressure and makes life easier
December 1, 2017 at 11:20 AM
Dear Andrea Rossi:
You say the E-Cat QX worked at limited power during the Stockholm event at the
IVA (20 W). What is its real power?
December 1, 2017 at 12:31 PM
Average 60 W, max for continuous operation 100 W
If you quote you should quote including the spelling mistakes
the heat generated by the control system and dissipated by the cooling system is warmth that from the thermal balance point of view theoretically is perfectly recoverable with COP 1 because if I have, if I dissipate 60W consumed 60W, then the same 60W I go to recover with a heat exchanger and is out of It does not have to do anything with what is the thermal balance and therefore the COP of the E-Cat, but it is clear that it is a problem to be solved because if one buys an E-Cat to make electricity, retrieve the It does not matter to him and so, so it's not the point. As a result, it is a problem to be solved, in the sense that ... and this is precisely the point where we are focusing; that is to say the maximum because that big white box that you have seen today, which is now the control system, must be reduced to a packet of cigarettes to govern ... anyway keep in mind that this control system here is able to govern a thousand of E-Cat, so the relationship is quite relevant. But the big problem is to reduce the size, because it is not ... we have a huge energy intensity at the reactor level because we produce, today we produced 20W in one, ... pretty much a tenth of a centimeter cubic. Of course, a remarkable density.
This is ridiculous, Master Control System and Main Control Hardware and Software for the energy sector is available in any size, shape, color and, if necessary, in any desired flavor. You do not have to reinvent the wheel to get 20 or 60 watts under control (even if it's 1000 units), just buy them for example here and integrate it:
huge energy intensity at the reactor level because we produce, today we produced 20W i
And the pulsed interval of the system in operation is completely different:
4 Seconds ON - 4 Seconds OFF - 4 Seconds ON - 4 Seconds OFF ... and so on
...so for the control measurement at the end of the demo the controller inside the white box was switch to a different operating mode.
14 Seconds ON - ~1 Seconds OFF - 14 Seconds ON - ~1 Seconds OFF ... and so on
I am convinced that inside the 'controlbox' (if it is a controller at all) is a 12V battery (AGM for cars, or for use as solar ups power supply e.g.)
There is a grey 230V wire going in the box that is probably connected with a battery charger.
At the end of the demo the battery is discharged the voltage is 11.52 V what is normal for an empty battery.
The overall voltage of the system is 12 Volt. see Video:
"So, the total voltage of the system is 12Volt" - Mats Lewan at 02:42:26 confirmed by Fabiani and Rossi.
The switch-intervall of the controlbox is ~14 sec (see timestamp of the screenshots),
~0 Volt 02:41:44
11.52 Volt 02:41:45
~0 Volt 02:41:58
11.52 Volt 02:41:59
~0 Volt 02:42:11
11.52 Volt 02:42:19 (visibility delayed covered by Rossis head)
~0 Volt 02:42:25
11.52 Volt 02:42:26
~0 Volt 02:42:38
11.52 Volt 02:42:40
~0 Volt 02:42:51
11.52 Volt 02:42:53
~0 Volt 02:43:05
My assumption is that a fully charged battery was used which has done all the work, hence the short test period, the thin wires and the secret fiddling with the control box.
Rossi's theory is processes in volcanoes
Ok it is not fusion, but do you know that we have an active natural nuclear fission reactor on planet earth?
Hello DR Rossi
I seen this comment from E48 on ECat World
11 hours ago
Just before Mats starts the tests with different resistor values, Rossi lifts the cover on the White control box and apparently switches a switch or two:
E cat QX presentation 24 November 2017 — disq.us
Which to this observer casts a big shadow over the validity of the tests Mats conducted.
Apparently Mats did not see this occur as he was looking at the data from Hurley.
As Rossi did not explain what he did nor why he did it, to me this killed any credibility on the input power claims.
Could you comment on it?
Enjoyed your QX demonstration.
November 26, 2017 at 9:45 AM
I checked what you say, it is between the time 2h 30′ and 2h 31′.
I opened an air window to help the air circulation since when the E-Cat has been turned off the cooling system was disconnected.
After 2 hours of work and after the operation of the spectrometer without cooling circulation in the heat exchanger I wanted to help the hot air out.
This has nothing to do with the measurements we were making.
It would interested me what Fabiani says in Italian to Rossi at 00:48 sec in this clip?
The presentation video was uploaded again:
Doral Second Floor
Even if E-cat X is real, which I cautiously doubt, Doral (and many other moments), shows a huge level of misconducts, of fooling again and again and again his partners and his supporters.
AlainCo If you look at the big picture then many of the business - 'partners' and 'supporter' of Rossi are acting like hungry sharks in a shark tank. The problem is that they have to act like that, because the Ecat, if it is real, is the deal of the century (if not the best deal ever) and our economics base on competition and competition requires at least one player with inferior target attainment (here Rossi) and players in privileged positions who have already achieved a higher degree of target achievement and that are in most cases hard-hitting businessmen who try by all means to maintain their privileged position and improve.
All is about evidence.
Personally, I consider the November's presentation as Rossi's last chance, if he does not undoubtedly deliver what he promises (Sigma 5 Prototype on the verge of market maturity), then I withdraw my support and put Rossi in the long line of scammers. But the likelihood that he'll has 'something' is very high and him should be given the opportunity to present what he has without prejudice.
sifferkoll I think it would be smarter not always to ride personal attacks, your actual message is always obscured by this pointless guerrilla warfare and dick comparison in terms of truth and conspiracy theory.
fyi... we are working on it and have informed our admin to resolve this problem.
(This can possibly take a while because in Germany today is a public holiday)
For (the most of) us it is still completely in question whether LENRs exists at all.
barty For me the question is not if LENR exists, or is real, (I think the evidence that there is a kind of effect, what ever it is, is more or less, even scientifically undisputed), the main question for me is, 'Can mankind use the LENR effect to produce energy, that can help to replace the today's problematic existing energy sources and help saving the earth climate and other man made problems?'