Alain - any room for wizdom in your world?
Wizdom and self interest always in contradiction? www.resourceminer.nu
Alain - any room for wizdom in your world?
Wizdom and self interest always in contradiction? www.resourceminer.nu
Abd: You disappoint me. Look at Kaku video from 1:25. He is OPEN to CF now.
Abd: Sincere is like honest - not needed to be correct. It is opposite to propaganda. I can be honest but in error.
I bet! Question is for the benefit of IH or LC? Will he step up for IH?
I have seen articles from VT before and my impression is they are quite sincere about LENR/CF:
Let's say all italians are guilty by association, but what about Barry West? Is he also part of the original scam team with the common goal to share $100 Mill?
Kaku one month ago: "Cold Fusion - I'm open about it", see 1:25 into this video:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10153610046843527&id=46126453526&refsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fm.facebook.com%2FBigThinkdotcom%2Fvideos%2F10153610046843527%2F&_rdr
Hi Ecco, I hope Svein see your post and answer. I wonder if this is what happens how is it giving out the extra energy? My understanding is that after the condensation from H(1) to H(-1) it will go back to it's ground state while emitting Gamma/X-Ray/UV? And if so what is the energy out compared to energy put in needed for the pressure?
Maybe this experiment is already done, the result to expect is soft X-rays as bremsstrahlung, same as MFMP glowstick 5.2, but can also be the lower threshold of the well known pinch effect or something like Mills hydrino or Rydberg matter. Interesting report from 1997 anyway:
axil: Stimuli or shock is just words but in this context we mean the same thing, the hint we have is as you say high dI/dT (square pulses) into the heater coil although exactly how to produce and when apply is uncertain. I hope me356 can tell something about it or if me356 have another stimuli which he has not told us about.
"Then the lenr process is ignited using a shock - magnetic, thermal or physical"
Agree Steve. Piantelli and Godes (Brillouin) are clear about this. Parkhomov and Rossi not. MFMP already showed the mouse 1.2-ish COP by cycling temp/pressure.
The shock is left to test. Possibly it must be done at a certain situation.
And the Swedish votes are:
"General relativity was accepted generally within 4 years. Many scientists accepted it immediately - it was too beautiful to be wrong. The problem with Wegener was that he didn't have a theory. It was only a description of observations. And geology was an underdeveloped science. The last two examples were in conflict with religious dogma - Darwin is not 100% accepted today!"
Well, Cold Fusion is 100 years old.
"I am afraid, but LENR is not safe as it looked initially. You can make a nuclear reactor with all the things you really don't want."
Mankind already have the knowledge how to ruin life for centuries. However that knowledge is controlled by the military and nuclear industry. Are you afraid the knowledge spreads to the "wrong" people? I would have problem with such thoughts in your position I think.
Axil: Is this Condensed Plasmoids (CP) theory consistent with your thoughts? http://www.cfcr.de/cp_quantum_mechanics.pdf
His website: http://www.cfcr.de
100 years. That's discoveries from 1916...
The root cause for the temp difference is still unknown. The two sides do communicate thermally so if the cause is an exothermic reaction on the Active side then the Null side would also be hotter than a calibration run with same power in - which it is(!). The color of the mullite tube darkens a little bit after 7 days of thermal stress, probably both sides would degrade about the same but someone skilled in the art of emissivity impact on Optris might can elaborate on that. A post calibration run would tell I think.
TC: Agree radiation is very interesting now when it is very hard to dismiss temperature behaviour. Also pressure behaviour is interesting to get ideas of what is going on inside. In the GS5.3 setup there are a number of instruments picking up radiation signals. You can always propose glitches or systematic errors for one single instrument, if two or more correlate the results are harder to dismiss. Stay tuned.
Paradigm-noja: The small part showed in pictures is just that - a small part of the total data catched during the run. Temperature measurements are duplicated during the whole run with both thermocouples and a thermal IR camera (Optris, same type as in Lugano). Optris and TC:s correlate but differ in absolute terms. Details have been discussed during the run, some aftermath still to do.
All data is open for download and analysis.