The Playground

NEGATIVE CAPACITANCE

NOT COVID

Ferroelectric and Ferromagnetic properties of metamaterials appear to play a role in CMNS...

Developing control of such properties (tunable or switchable ferromagnetism) is of interest. Nano tech breakthrough and discovery provides insight.

Negative Capacitance is a new frontier to study as well as discharge triggering and nano emitters. waveguides. Nano energy control or focusing methods in, what may described as, 'Smart CMNS Solid State Systems', are considered possible. Nano and LENR advancements are in lockstep, joined at the hip.

Worth keeping watch of.

Study arenas expand.

Major Breakthrough in Engineered Crystals Could Help Computers Run on Less Power

By UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - BERKELEY APRIL 10, 2022

Major Breakthrough in Engineered Crystals Could Help Computers Run on Less Power

A new material created by University of California, Berkeley, researchers could reduce the energy required to control advanced silicon transistors. Computers…

scitechdaily.com

• Creating negative capacitance requires careful manipulation of a material property called ferroelectricity, which occurs when a material exhibits a spontaneous electrical field. Previously, the effect has only been achieved in ferroelectric materials called perovskites, whose crystal structure is not compatible with silicon.

Also

• by combining hafnium oxide and zirconium oxide in an engineered crystal structure called a superlattice, which leads to simultaneous ferroelectricity and antiferroelectricity.
• “We found that this combination actually gives us an even better negative capacitance effect, which shows that this negative capacitance phenomena is a lot broader than originally thought,” said study co-first author Suraj Cheema, a postdoctoral researcher at UC Berkeley. “Negative capacitance doesn’t just occur in the conventional picture of a ferroelectric with a dielectric, which is what’s been studied over the past decade. You can actually make the effect even stronger by engineering these crystal structures to exploit antiferroelectricity in tandem with ferroelectricity.”

Quote from Shane D.

Sweden's inconvenient Covid victory - UnHerd

Compared to other Nordic countries, Sweden's response was disastrous. They had far more cases, more deaths, and more economic damage. As of today, per capita, there were 1,809 deaths per million in Sweden compared to 485 in Norway. See also:

Norway versus Sweden: A case study in COVID-19 response

Biljana Stangeland PhD, analyses the drastic disparity in COVID-19 casualties between Norway and Sweden looking the public health sector

www.openaccessgovernment.org

[As of December 2021] the number of confirmed cases and deaths in selected Nordic countries were assessed again (Figure 1A). According to ECDC (5) there were in total 1.16 million documented COVID-19 cases in Sweden, while more than 14,900 people lost their lives due to the disease. In Norway during the same period, there were 193,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases and 871 COVID-19 related deaths. Adjusted to the population size, the number of cases was five times higher in Sweden, and the number of COVID-19 related deaths was 12 times higher in Sweden than in Norway (Figure 1B).

From Statistica:

Data omission

WARNING.

Lawyers outraged over use of AI in courts

Malaysian lawyers criticize the use of AI in court sentencing of drug dealers and rapists

www.rt.com

Quote from JedRothwell

Compared to other Nordic countries, Sweden's response was disastrous.

Compared to the USA underground CoV-19 plan/politics Sweden did great. All children could go to school no real lockdown almost normal live.

But compared to India all big countries look like terror regimes that tried to kill as many people as possible for the benefit of a few big "vaccine" share holders and other pharma providers (Masks, tests, crap medicine)

The country that did profit most from the US criminal behavior is Switzerland. Last year USA became the biggest trade partner as exports to USA first time surpassed the ones to Germany!

And guess what Switzerland shipped in masses....

Quote from Wyttenbach

Compared to the USA underground CoV-19 plan/politics Sweden did great.

The U.S. is a low bar to pass! It has the worst record among developed countries, with 3,029 deaths per million. This is third-world level mortality, because we have a third-world grade healthcare and public health system for most people. Obesity alone guaranteed there would be thousands of deaths. GOP and right wing opposition to vaccination killed hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Quote from Wyttenbach

All children could go to school no real lockdown almost normal live.

That is also true of Japan, Korea, and the other Nordic countries. No lockdowns, but far lower fatalities than Sweden, because they implemented other public health steps such as masking and case tracking. Again:

Sweden 1,809 deaths/million

Germany 1,574

Denmark 1,018

Finland 600

Norway 485

S. Korea 378

Japan 220

There were some other European countries with more fatalities than Sweden:

UK 2,487

Italy 2,670

You only need lockdowns when you do not take any other effective steps, and when your citizens include many Death Cult Fanatics who refuse to wear masks or get vaccinated. Lockdowns are the last ditch, worst method of reducing COVID cases and fatalities.

Quote from Wyttenbach

And guess what Switzerland shipped in masses....

Switzerland 1,570. Not much better than Sweden, but of course way ahead of the U.S.

Quote from Shane D.

Sweden's inconvenient Covid victory - UnHerd

As early as Dec. 2020, many Swedish leaders said that their COVID response was a failure:

Coronavirus: Swedish King Carl XVI Gustaf says coronavirus approach 'has failed'

Sweden has been criticised for its more relaxed approach to handling the pandemic.

www.bbc.com

Sweden's king has said his country "failed" to save lives with its relatively relaxed approach to the coronavirus pandemic.

King Carl XVI Gustaf made the remarks as part of an annual TV review of the year with the royal family.

Sweden, which has never imposed a full lockdown, has seen nearly 350,000 cases and more than 7,800 deaths - a lot more than its Scandinavian neighbours.

Prime Minister Stefan Lofven said he agreed with the king's remarks.

"Of course the fact that so many have died can't be considered as anything other than a failure," Mr Lofven told reporters.

Referring to the government's strategy, Mr Lofven added that "it's when we are through the pandemic that the real conclusions can be drawn".

In the programme, the king says: "I think we have failed. We have a large number who have died and that is terrible. . . .

If this is success, what would an unnecessary tragic failure look like?

Okay . . . the answer: It would look like the U.S., where hundreds of thousands of people died in vain because those people and their GOP leaders were idiots, blinded by fanatical anti-science anti-vaccination ignorance. Granted, Sweden was only half as bad as the U.S., but that is nothing to brag about. That's like being half as evil as Putin.

Safety Monitoring Board Stops Clinical Trial Due to Positive Data Associated with COVID-19 Therapy

Safety Monitoring Board Stops Clinical Trial Due to Positive Data Associated with COVID-19 Therapy

The Independent Data Safety Monitoring Board overseeing the testing of a novel therapeutic from Veru Pharma unanimously recommended their phase 3 trial be

trialsitenews.com

The Independent Data Safety Monitoring Board overseeing the testing of a novel therapeutic from Veru Pharma unanimously recommended their phase 3 trial be stopped early due to overwhelming evidence to support efficacy. The phase 3 double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial was evaluating oral sabizabulin 9 mg versus placebo in 150 hospitalized COVID-19 patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The trial was conducted in the United States, Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, Mexico, and Bulgaria. COVID-19 infections treated in the study included the Delta and Omicron variants.

TrialSite News covered this investigational product while it was underlying a phase 2 clinical trial.

At the time, it was known as Veru-111 and later was renamed to Sabizabulin. Here is an article about the drug can be found here.

The Study

The prespecified primary endpoint was death at or before day sixty.

Sabizabulin treatment resulted in a clinically and statistically meaningful 55% relative reduction in deaths (p=0.0029) in the intent to treat population. Placebo group (n=52) had a 45% mortality rate compared to the sabizabulin-treated group (n=98) which had a 20% mortality rate.

The Company plans to meet with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to discuss the next steps, including submitting an emergency use authorization application. As previously disclosed, the FDA granted Fast Track designation to the sabizabulin COVID-19 clinical program in January 2022, which the Company hopes will help streamline the emergency use authorization process.

Unfortunately, they have not published the underlying data yet. The preliminary results look promising, but the trial was quite small, and stopping it early limits the amount of data.

Stopping trials early can lead to the effects being overstated. This risk is increased with smaller trials such as this one. Here is a paper that discusses this risk: TrialSite thanks Orange County’s Paul Elkins for this update.

About Veru Pharma

Based in Miami, Florida, Veru Inc. is originally a Wisconsin corporation that is the successor to The Wisconsin Pharmacal Company, Inc. (Wisconsin Pharmacal), a company that manufactured and marketed disparate specialty chemical and branded consumer products. Wisconsin Pharmacal was originally incorporated in 1971.

In 1996, they completed the acquisition of worldwide rights to their first-generation female condom, the divestiture of Wisconsin Pharmacal’s other businesses.

By October 31, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Aspen Park Pharmaceuticals, Inc. which transitioned them from a single product company selling the FC2 Female Condom® (Internal Condom) to an oncology biopharmaceutical company with a focus on developing novel medicines for the management of breast and prostate cancers; an antiviral/anti-inflammatory drug development program for the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome; and, a commercial Sexual Health Division which includes a drug candidate, ENTADFI™, a new treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia and the FC2 Female Condom® (Internal Condom).

On July 31, 2017, they changed their corporate name from “The Female Health Company” to “Veru Inc.” reflecting their focus on developing and commercializing biopharmaceutical products for oncology.

What about their stock price? It’s been depressed like much biotech with a 52-week high-low of 14.57 to 4.34. Currently, their stock price trades at 11.15.

Florida Hospital Stops Ivermectin Without Telling Family, Fires Nurse for Advocating for It (theepochtimes.com)

Interesting story. IMO, it illustrates how a FUD campaign against Ivermectin started by the top leaders of the health care industry, picked up by a compliant media, and spurred on by big pharma, grew into this beast that consumed all in it's path. No amount of reason, common sense, or facts could tame it. In this case a good woman lost her life, but the beast did not care.

Quote from Shane D.

In this case a good woman lost her life, but the beast did not care.

This is the difference between India and USA. In India live matters in USA live costs...

1.400'000'000 Indian had access to Ivermectin treatment now CoV-19 is gone... USA::Live is gone...

Quote from Shane D.

Interesting story. IMO, it illustrates how a FUD campaign against Ivermectin started by the top leaders of the health care industry, picked up by a compliant media, and spurred on by big pharma, grew into this beast that consumed all in it's path. No amount of reason, common sense, or facts could tame it.

There are no "facts" the justify the use of ivermectin. There are no studies, and no theoretical basis to think it works. (Except in patients with worms.) Doctors should not use treatments that don't work. That is against medical ethics and common sense. Doctors must use their own best judgement. They are legally obligated to do this. If a doctor agrees that ivermectin does not work, he or she has a legal and moral obligation not to use it. You seem to be suggesting that doctors should be forced to provide drugs and treatments they think will not work.

Nurses are not allowed to decide the course of treatment. Only a doctor can do that.

Quote from Shane D.

In this case a good woman lost her life, but the beast did not care.

Ivermectin could not have saved her, any more than insulin, aspirin or rat poison could have. "The beast" (doctors) are following the laws that have governed medical practice for 150 years or so. Do you really want to throw away the laws, and start forcing doctors to do things they think should not be done?

If this woman or her family wanted to be given quack treatments that do not work, she was free to sign an AMA form and leave the hospital. She could have found another doctor who was willing to kill her for profit. There are plenty of quack doctors willing to kill patients with dangerous treatments and drugs that do not work.

Most Deadly Year in U.S. History Under President Biden’s Watch—Accountability Comes with the Role

2021 was a grim year for Americans making U.S. history as the deadliest on record. This isn’t a record that the current POTUS wants to be associated with but that’s the unfortunate reality as COVID-19 deaths exploded despite available vaccines and treatments. However, POTUS’ administration usurped control of monoclonal antibodies, centralizing the distribution based on equitable principles rather than patient demands (markets), while the war on physicians’ early care regimens (e.g. ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, fluvoxamine, etc.) may have also had an impact in 2021 as pressure was placed on these physicians not to care for their patients earlier because the federal authorities don’t approve of these physician-patient local choices. Yes, 2021 was deadly with 3.465 million deaths representing 80,000 more than the record set in 2020. Meanwhile, 351,000 people died somehow related to COVID-19 in 2020 while 415,000 died in 2021 as dynamically mutating pathogens, leaky vaccines, and growing restlessness among the American public to go back to normal represented a confluence of factors and forces leading to the record death toll. America has experienced overall far more COVID-19 deaths than any other country at over one million now.

POTUS came in on an aggressive pandemic campaign on the failure of the previous president (Trump), yet the results don’t look great. The current president and its administration have been adept at blaming others such as unvaccinated persons, yet little discussed in the mainstream media is Biden’s war on early treatment with off-label therapeutics. The previous administration showed far more tolerance in local physician decision making for example. While the vaccines touted by the current POTUS were developed under Trump’s Operation Warp Speed.

Of course, this independent, apolitical unbiased media has been quite critical of Trump as well, as the controversial developer and performer turned president early on denied the severity of the pandemic, gutting the pandemic response team and other actions that created real problems in 2020. Yet Biden came in with a lot in place yet managed to alienate large swathes of the American public with draconian vaccine mandates for example. This action served to only divide the population along ideological lines.

Perhaps all of these actions contributed to the ominous 2021 statistics recently covered by Mike Stobbe writing for AP News.

COVID-19, overdoses pushed US to highest death total ever

NEW YORK (AP) — 2021 was the deadliest year in U.S. history, and new data and research are offering more insights into how it got that bad. The main reason for…

apnews.com

Noreen Goldman from Princeton University chimed in recently on the experts’ ability to predict health performance across the country declaring “We were wrong, unfortunately” in regards to their prediction that 2021 would be a far more optimistic year, undoubtedly with some political motivation among some of the health care agency cohort.

TrialSite suggests the COVID-19 pandemic is far from over with dangerous pathogens continuing to evolve while evading vaccine-induced immunity within weeks according to recent research in Israel. While the vaccines do help prevent more serious disease and death, it’s become clearer that a combination of factors, from vaccinations and pharmaceutical therapies to off-label early-onset care are probably needed to reduce the death toll, declares many front-line physicians along with more caution among the American public

Quote from JedRothwell

There are no "facts" the justify the use of ivermectin. There are no studies, and no theoretical basis to think it works. (Except in patients with worms.) Doctors should not use treatments that don't work. That is against medical ethics and common sense. Doctors must use their own best judgement. They are legally obligated to do this. If a doctor agrees that ivermectin does not work, he or she has a legal and moral obligation not to use it. You seem to be suggesting that doctors should be forced to provide drugs and treatments they think will not work.

Nurses are not allowed to decide the course of treatment. Only a doctor can do that.

Ivermectin could not have saved her, any more than insulin, aspirin or rat poison could have. "The beast" (doctors) are following the laws that have governed medical practice for 150 years or so. Do you really want to throw away the laws, and start forcing doctors to do things they think should not be done?

If this woman or her family wanted to be given quack treatments that do not work, she was free to sign an AMA form and leave the hospital. She could have found another doctor who was willing to kill her for profit. There are plenty of quack doctors willing to kill patients with dangerous treatments and drugs that do not work.

Display More

Did you read the opening paragraph?

The children of a 55-year-old Florida woman say the hospital treating their mother for COVID-19 told her, and them, that she would be treated with ivermectin. But the treatment was stopped after she improved because a hospital pharmacist intervened, medical records show.

Treatment stopped by a pharmacist, while improving. Doesn't seem to be a doctor involved

Quote from Fm1

Most Deadly Year in U.S. History Under President Biden’s Watch—Accountability Comes with the Role

For once I fully agree with at TrialSiteNews headline. The GOP, Fox News and the anti-vaxxer Death Cult should be held accountable. They killed hundreds of thousands of people. More than all U.S. wars combined. Biden did all he could to prevent that, while the GOP killed people for political advantage. It is an outrage.

Quote from Fm1

Did you read the opening paragraph?

The children of a 55-year-old Florida woman say the hospital treating their mother for COVID-19 told her, and them, that she would be treated with ivermectin. But the treatment was stopped after she improved because a hospital pharmacist intervened, medical records show.

That is what a hospital pharmacist is supposed to do. If he or she had not done that, he could be held for criminal malpractice. Of course the doctors have to agree. A pharmacist alone would never be allowed to make that determination without the doctor's approval. But a pharmacist has a legal obligation to speak up and recommend against the use of a drug, when that drug is known to be ineffective or contraindicated.

It says "medical records show." The patient (or family if she is unconscious) is given full access to medical records these days. So no one deceived the patient. The course of treatment was spelled out. They did not tell "her, or them" they were going to supply ivermectin. They told them the opposite -- it was right there in the written medical record.

If they verbally told them one thing and then wrote something else in the record, that would be a violation of medical ethics and grounds for a malpractice lawsuit. I doubt any doctor would be that stupid. I think the family is lying. The story does not hang together.

As I said, the main thing is, if the patient was conscious she could have signed herself out of the hospital with AMA form, and gone to some quack doctor who would have killed her sooner with more pain and suffering. Or is she was not capable of doing that, the family might have arranged it, if she had signed a form authorizing them.

Quote from Fm1

Treatment stopped by a pharmacist, while improving. Doesn't seem to be a doctor involved

That never happens. Not in any hospital in the U.S. or Japan. The doctor always has to sign off on any treatment. That's the law. I don't know much about medicine, but I know that is the law, because my relatives are doctors and pharmacists.

If there was any improvement, you can be 100% sure it had nothing to do with ivermectin. Which I doubt they ever used in the first place. No mainstream hospital or doctor would allow that kind of quack treatment in 2022. You have to go to some back alley murder-for-profit quack or Death Cult Lunatic to get that kind of treatment. Or go home and self-treat.

HAVE WE ENTERED A SELF-SUSTAINING MODUS OPERANDI FOR COVID-19?

HAVE WE ENTERED A SELF-SUSTAINING MODUS OPERANDI FOR COVID-19?

In the present phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, there appears to be positive feedback among the COVID-19 "vaccinations", the immune system, and COVID-19

trialsitenews.com

In the present phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, there appears to be positive feedback among the COVID-19 “vaccinations”, the immune system, and COVID-19 infections. This raises the possibility of our having entered a self-sustaining modus operandi for COVID-19 due to mass “vaccination”.

SELF-SUSTAINING SYSTEMS DUE TO POSITIVE FEEDBACK MECHANISMS

Some systems can be viewed as having three main modes of operation: Driven, Self-Reinforcing, Self-Sustaining. In the Driven mode, external inputs are required for system operation. In the Self-Reinforcing mode, the external inputs are augmented by feedback from the system outputs to allow semi-autonomous operation. In the Self-Sustaining mode, the system operation is completely autonomous, and no external inputs are required. In the latter case, if external inputs are still employed, the system operation can be viewed as Accelerated Self-Sustaining mode.

Consider the striking of a match. Initially, one puts energy into the system by moving the match against the friction of the surface. This is the Driven mode. At some point, the match begins to ignite, denoted by spark production. This is the Self-Reinforcing mode, where some of the energy created by combustion is augmenting the energy supplied by the person striking the match. Finally, the match switches from the ignition mode to the burn mode, where no further external energy is required to keep the reaction/flame going. This is the Self-Sustaining mode.

Controlled magnetic fusion provides a good real-world example of the three modes of operation. The mainline controlled fusion approaches heat a plasma (gas of ions and free electrons) to sufficiently high temperatures that enable the reactants (e.g., deuterium-tritium) to fuse and release vast amounts of energy. The power is supplied to the plasma initially by e.g., microwave heaters or neutral beam injectors (https://www.thalesgroup.com/en…-heating-systems-tokamaks). This is the Driven mode, and the plasma heats sufficiently that some initial fusion reactions can occur. At some point, the energy from the fusion reactions contributes to heating the plasma, signifying entry into the Self-Reinforcing mode. Finally, the energy generated by the fusion reactions and its absorption in the plasma (e.g., heating of the plasma ions by particle collisions) are sufficiently high that external energy input is no longer required to maintain plasma heating, and the system has entered the Self-Sustaining mode of plasma burn. In the controlled fusion case, it is possible to exit the Self-Sustaining mode in multiple ways: terminate fuel input, terminate magnetic confinement, etc.

Fossil fuel heating of the atmosphere is the final background example. In the Driven mode, greenhouse gases (mainly CO2) from fossil fuel combustion (and other sources) enter the atmosphere. They allow the high-frequency solar radiation to pass through the atmosphere, but block (to some extent) the low-frequency terrestrial radiation from exiting the atmosphere. This leads to increased heating and climate change based solely on the additional thermal radiation entrapment resulting from the external fossil fuel combustion reaction byproduct input to the atmosphere (Driven mode). At some point, positive feedbacks begin to occur (e.g., permafrost thaws—> methane released to atmosphere—> more terrestrial radiation trapped—> more permafrost thawing, etc.), and the fossil fuel combustion byproduct input is augmented by the Self-Reinforcing methane input, thereby furthering the thermal radiation entrapment and accelerating the climate change. Finally, the positive feedbacks become sufficiently large that anthropogenic inputs are no longer required to maintain the climate change, and Self-Sustaining operation has been achieved. If the anthropogenic inputs are continued in the latter case, an Accelerated Self-Sustaining mode of operation will exist. In this example, it is not clear that the Self-Sustaining mode can be terminated (as was the case for controlled fusion).

SELF-SUSTAINING OPERATION OF COVID-19 “VACCINATIONS”

For more than a year, Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche has been warning against mass prophylactic vaccination in the midst of a pandemic; e.g.,

“Mass vaccination campaigns have been rolled out on a background of high infectious pressure. This has resulted in elevated numbers of previously asymptomatically infected subjects who became susceptible to Covid-19 disease or exert suboptimal, S-directed immune pressure. As increasing vaccination rates will result in a gradually expanding reservoir of asymptomatic viral spreaders, the benefit of reduced disease and hence, viral shedding in vaccinated elderly (or otherwise vulnerable subjects) will be countered by enhanced spread and breeding of more infectious variants in less vulnerable, asymptomatic subjects. The higher the vaccination rate, the more the latter effect will outweigh the benefit of vaccine-mediated reduction of immune pressure exerted by the vulnerable part of the population.”

(https://www.voiceforscienceand…tious-sars-2-cov-variants)

The mass COVID-19 “vaccinations” started about fifteen months ago. Those who have received the COVID-19 “vaccines” appear to be entering a Self-Sustaining mode of COVID-19<—>COVID-19 “vaccination” feedback, as follows. About six months after the initial COVID-19 “vaccinations”, the recipients’ immune response against COVID-19 infection has weakened sufficiently to be marginally better than that of the “unvaccinated” (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.30.462488v1; https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/1/64). At this point in time, the recipients have a choice. They can refuse a booster shot, or they can receive the booster shot.

If they refuse the booster, their immune response continues to wane/weaken until they enter the state of negative vaccine effectiveness (as shown in studies from the UK, Canada, New Zealand, Sweden, and other countries) (e.g., https://wentworthreport.com/20…-is-negative-by-9-months/). In this region, they are MORE vulnerable to COVID-19 infections than the “unvaccinated”

(https://igorchudov.substack.co…ronic-covid-is-taking?s=r; https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03…ve-a-i-d-s-nz-uk-ca-data/).

I haven’t seen any studies that go more than nine-ten months beyond initial COVID-19 “vaccination”, so I don’t know whether the weakening of the immune response plateaus or keeps declining to the state of VAIDS (Vaccine Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome)! If the latter occurs (and the trends from these different country studies mentioned above suggest that it will), then the people with VAIDS become highly vulnerable to myriad serious diseases, including re-emergence of long-dormant viruses, emergence of cancers, and emergence of autoimmune diseases.

If, on the other hand, the COVID-19 “vaccine” recipients decide to take the booster, they will then experience a temporary increase in antibody-based immune response and two longer-term highly negative results. The temporary increase in antibody-based immune response will wane over the next few months following the pattern of the previous shots (see the following for impact of booster for UK (https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04…nt-covid-deaths/#comments)). This transient period for the booster appears to be about six months for the initial strain up to and including the Delta variant, but perhaps three months for the Omicron variant (https://www.medrxiv.org/conten…101/2021.12.30.21268565v2; https://www.medrxiv.org/conten…101/2022.01.07.22268919v3). At the end of this transient period, another booster would be required to maintain increased antibody-based immune response.

The two longer-term negative results from the booster include 1) suppression of innate immunity (https://www.authorea.com/users…es-exosomes-and-micrornas; https://www.medrxiv.org/conten…80cL2TA7_9C2MxyJkTjdZnMjQ) and 2) extensive tissue and organ damage (including substantial microclotting). The former will lead to increases in the conditions mentioned previously (emergence of dormant viruses, emergence of cancers, emergence of autoimmune diseases, etc). The latter organ and tissue damage will lead to decreased functionality, and may be partially or wholly to blame for the massive increases we are seeing of professional athletes collapsing/dying on the field of play or, like the recent Miami Open, having to withdraw en masse! This organ/tissue damage can be seen most vividly on the autopsy slides of Dr. Arne Burkhardt (shown in the second OpEd mentioned above), where cardiac damage seems to span most autopsies. For the latest in Dr. Burkhardt’s findings (e.g., https://www.bitchute.com/video/ljSS9LrKymZo/), enter his name in the Bitchute search engine, and sort by Most Recent. Autopsies are the Gold Standard for vaccine-induced damage and death attribution, and Dr. Burkhardt’s are well worth the time expended to view these videos.

The positive feedback mechanisms above that lead to Self-Sustaining operation have focused mainly (not solely) on the feedbacks from multiple COVID-19 “vaccine” shots. However, the increased vulnerability to COVID-19 infection after the immune response waning period, and the emergence of what appears to be chronic COVID-19, leads to additional positive feedback mechanisms. Igor Chudov has recently pointed out the following consequences of chronic COVID-19 on remaining immune function:

“Chronic Covid is a situation where the vaccinated cannot develop natural immunity, cannot quickly clear infections, and remain ill and infectious for extended period of time. Such repeat infections progressively damage their immunity to the point of not being able to clear Covid at all. That would lead to people being chronically infected, infecting others, and overwhelmed with toxic Covid viral proteins, while remaining immunosuppressed. (https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/aids-like-chronic-covid-is-taking?s=r)”.

The key point is that the infection from the SARS-CoV-2 virus damages the immune system further, and augments the damage done to the immune system by the COVID-19 “vaccines”. Further, once the immune system has been degraded severely, the host is now vulnerable to myriad different viruses and other infectious microorganisms, and many other types of diseases, including cancers and autoimmune diseases. Each of these diseases will damage not only the immune system, but, depending on the disease modus operandi, the circulatory system, neural system, endocrine system, etc., as well. Thus, even without the boosters, we have a Self-Sustaining system based on the synergy of 1) the initial COVID-19 “vaccinations” and 2) the myriad forms of diseases that exploit the immune system weakened by the initial COVID-19 “vaccinations”. Adding in the boosters, we appear to have an accelerated Self-Sustaining system based on the synergy of 1) repeated COVID-19 “vaccinations” and 2) myriad forms of diseases that exploit the immune system weakened by the initial COVID-19 “vaccinations”.

The synergies above, in turn, occur within the larger context of external factors that contribute to weakening of the immune system and other bodily systems (e.g., poor diet, substance abuse, air pollution, pesticides, heavy metals, immunosuppressant drugs, etc.) (https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/62907 – Table 3-1). These contributing factors provide further positive feedback within the umbrella of even more complex synergies. Unfortunately, no one (to my knowledge) has demonstrated that the COVID-19 “vaccinated” can somehow exit either of the above Self-Sustaining systems, at least not in a vertical position

Quote from JedRothwell

For once I fully agree with at TrialSiteNews headline. The GOP, Fox News and the anti-vaxxer Death Cult should be held accountable. They killed hundreds of thousands of people. More than all U.S. wars combined. Biden did all he could to prevent that, while the GOP killed people for political advantage. It is an outrage.

Yes Hilary, we are the deplorables

Quote from Fm1

The positive feedback mechanisms above that lead to Self-Sustaining operation have focused mainly (not solely) on the feedbacks from multiple COVID-19 “vaccine” shots.
“Chronic Covid is a situation where the vaccinated cannot develop natural immunity, cannot quickly clear infections, and remain ill and infectious for extended period of time. Such repeat infections progressively damage their immunity to the point of not being able to clear Covid at all. That would lead to people being chronically infected, infecting others, and overwhelmed with toxic Covid viral proteins, while remaining immunosuppressed. (https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/aids-like-chronic-covid-is-taking?s=r)”.

From the last independent (of FM/R/V/B) US journal:: https://www.thedesertreview.co…ec-bc97-87690ada2664.html

The full interview:: https://www.theepochtimes.com/…4382543.html?rs=SHRCVHWJM