Posts by RobertBryant

Suhas Ralkar probably leads the world in his high power industrial ultrasonics expertise

http://rubiitpower.com/tech1.html

ferenz said

"Bob greenyer found indians willing to completely share their reactor design"

THANKS Suhas Ralkar , engineer exemplar

for this pot of ECCO tea that you share with the whole world

Its all the fault of cheap energy.

What will 7 billion human beings do on this planet when there is no more need for manpower.

Will they just exchange ad hominems over the net and not even bother to have a punchup.

And now Mills promises energy at about 1c per kilowatthr next year

what we need is to bring back wood burning

There would be full employment in no time and world full of smoke

but I won't be sharpening up my scythe to cut the lawn any time soon

We can't turn back the sundial

Wyttenbach said about Mills

"But at that level it's a small step to ⁴He. But he will never tell you this, because this would "void" his IP...

The Sun cell energy change level reported by Mills at at 340 EV per /H Atom or (240 times the enthalpy change for combustion)

would give you a lot more kilometres/litre of Hydrogen than the Toyota Mirai

Its also over ~300x the enthalpy change for TNT combustion .. ( on a per 1 amu=1H atom) basis

But it is still a large step(~3000x) away from 1MEV.

Perhaps it much more easy to get the hydrino energy levels through the patent process than getting

fusion/transmutation levels thru.

Combustion of hydrogen in oxygen yields energy ~1.4 eV/atom of hydrogen

27.2 eV is twenty times this chemical reaction

not a million times as might be expected with H nuclear fusion

but still a significantincrease

Randell Mills files patent 9 March

PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS REGARDING SAME

http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi…0070180&RS=DN/20170070180

Typo here " 27.2 eV since it ionizes at 54.417 eV, which is 227.2 eV."

is meant to be 2x 27.2?

Irvine 28 Feb

Hydrino road show from Randell Mills rolls on

No epiphany.. Terawatts globality...

Axil: I am only a beginner but I want to let my inner polaritron to go free.

But can I?

Apparently polaritrons from this reference are confined onto solid surfaces /crystal supports,

but are not free. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polariton

From reading the reference you gave me plasmons= polaritrons can be generated by visible and uv frequency.

My interpretation from https://www.researchgate.net/p…t_and_glimpse_into_future

Surface plasmons/polaritons if they exist may be involved in the generation of charge clusters.

The article mentions that the exciting frequency is in the visible(400-700) spectrum for Ag/Au but can be UV (~140 nm) for Aluminium

Silver has a better Q, “quality factor” than gold (80 versus 15 at exciting frequency corresponding to 700nm)

“Silver is a better plasmonic metal than gold” the reference states.. also..

a large energy amplification of input energy intensity is modelled for silver nanospheres as ~600.

For generation of photoelectrons, conventional double photon activation (2PP-PEEM) and 1pp-PEEM (depending on work function/ the exciting frequency) is proposed as the cause

Perhaps UV/ light photons generate lots of photoelectrons which then form charge clusters near the nanosphere/nanocrack

Perhaps the great energy amplification at hotspots due to surface plasmons in the nanosphere/nanocrack causes ejection of +ve metal ions to join the electron cluster to form a stabilised charge cluster (evo).That’s my idea.

But can I let my inner plasmon/polaritron go free?

Thanks axil

Nice pics but little math.. I can't find an answer to the question which comes out of Srinivan's query

I will bear in mind yr " soliton/polaritron" assertion

but I am still trying to figure out

What keeps a charge cluster together

and overcomes the Coulombic repulsion?

especially in ball lightning which fascinated both Tesla and Shoulders

I think that a Fox reference has some reference about -and will check that out.

http://scholar.google.com.au/s…SAhUBlZQKHW2iBsEQgQMIGTAA

Gold ions can be charged up to higher energies than deuterium ions

Putting numbers into the formula with 1836A/Z shows that 5000 V input

can put 18 Mevs into D+ and ~1800 Mevs into Au+

http://www.padrak.com/ine/FB97_1.html

does this mean that only 5V can yield 1.8 Mevs for Au+?

Axil said "EVO is not a cluster of electrons. The EVO is a soliton of polaritons"

My browser didn't go for the link

I need some math to answer the Srinivasan query.

What keeps a charge cluster together

and overcomes the Coulombic repulsion.

Can't find much here from LENR stalwart Hal Fox 1997

http://www.padrak.com/ine/FB97_1.html

who describes how the charge clusters/ can contain protons ? and great energy density can be imparted into these clusters.

I think one problem is wrong models eg (electrons as charged spinning point particles with mass.)

Perhaps the electron orbitsphere model of Randell Mills with 5 kinds of calculatable energy may explain how

ball lightning /charge clusters/EVOs, solitrons can stay together

zhydrogen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BLP-presentation-a.pdf

Re: Charge clusters- EVOs

Dr Srinivasan's Query ~8.00 time mark (redpill)003

"You have a million electrons all packed together

How can an electron cluster of a million..

and become a ....

I don’t understand electron cluster"

Neither do I and neither did Richard Feynman

but

"According to a recently published book (4) Shoulders described the idea of CC to Richard Feynman. The great scientist rejected the idea at first. But then he wrote (5): “when you were in my office I could not see how 10¹⁰ or 10¹¹ electrons could be kept as a ball in a vacuum without ions. So I was skeptical and didn’t let you tell me about them. I must apologize for it has come to my attention that it is indeed possible . . . Now that I understand how it might work, I should be glad to discuss it again anytime you wish.” Jin and Fox (1) refer to several theoretical papers devoted to CCs (6,7,8)"

Source: Kowalski 2003 http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/48clusters.html

It would be nice to see that letter.

What a tangled web we weave

Yes Srinivasan

I was wondering how many of the +12 k views of this thread are from India.

Perhaps India needs LENR more than other countries?

Rigel

asked quite abit

I was replying to Picasso, who asked me to check Maths.

I had no maths to check.. but if he wants me to check some relevant maths I can try.. provided it doesn't involve quaternions or Lagrangians

I, like Bob , am wary of official viewpoints, Anyone aware of LENR history should be wary of official viewpoints

I was actually unaware of dr Judy's book or all the fuss about Its not high profile in the Southern hemisphere.

Unaware as well re: EVO's.

Its possible that both are relevant to LENR

and by heaven its far more interesting than talking about Rossi etc

Picasso-150 wrote "check you math."

No math there to check

I just put Judy Wood's interpretation of a selected set of sequential photos.

which Bob presumably looked at in his 'epiphany' period

I am trying to check the validity of Bob's sources... that's all.

thanks for you input.

I don't think Bob is having a breakdown as Rigel suggests

but I appreciate the concern

Thanks for the reference about the other video

The video you refer to , I think I found,

is perhaps better for basing some maths on

using a few assumptions on lengths and angles

However reading the 76 comments attached to this video

there appears to be no math based debunking to actually check

IMO.

If you have some maths to check please advise

On an emotional level the horror of 2001 still registers with me,

even though I was comfortably away in NZ at the time.

God Bless America and Trump

Dewey doesn't think that Bob's marbles are in India

Well I think they ARE. They are rolling around in Suhar's plasma

https://soundcloud.com/user-554048314/suhas …

Barty "There is absolutely no logical sense for a government to suppress a technology"

Most politicians and civil servants in government have poor knowledge of which technology is better

However technological companies and inventors have a very logical reason to oppose and suppress 'better' competitors

Eventually these suppression efforts fail .. but 'eventually" can take decades.

Luckily Edison could not suppress Tesla's AC generator...

but if he had enough political/financial influence Edison would have suppressed it for decades

so that he could rake in the profits from his DC technology

1. Twin-towers AHA moment from http://drjudywood.com/wtc/

Steel columns disintegrating in thin air

2.EVOS:

I always wondered why Dash's electrolyte experiment on LENR in uranium showed the uranium cathode releasing more radioactivity above the electrolyte rather than below.

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DashJchangesint.pdf

EVOs = a possible explanation

3. Mr Weaver's role :"Pleasant words are a honeycomb, Sweet to the soul and healing to the bones." Prov16/24

I found Bob's presentation educational and at times disturbing but EVO's is an interesting idea.

Here is a link

http://blog.hasslberger.com/20…ers_evos_exotic_vacu.html

I thought a video conveys better the homosymbion zealotry

However Revelation says this

"The grace of the Lord Jesus be with God’s people.Amen."

I feel more comfortable with the measured zealotry of a Pennsylvania farmboy