- Member since May 23rd 2015
- Last Activity:
It's like a TV series that started decently but turned out to be pretty meh. We're all just committed to the plot at this point. Hopefully next season will be a bit better.
Predefined answer: Yes
Well it was gonna be either "yes" or no answer; I'm pretty happy with a yes given that we will possibly now be able to verify his claim later on.
Same with the entity being an organization that will somewhat well known. If it ends up being some random guy running a one-man corporation, that would contradict Rossi.
My bet is on the Uppsala crew. Ambiguous enough that it will appear like the university backed the testing.
I don't think the certification team will work independently from Rossi. As in, I think Rossi will be involved in one way or another in the testing of the device.
If you don't believe my above statement, I suggest you ask Rossi whether the certification team will be able to test the device on their own, without needing his intervention.
Guys, it''s just deep learning (according to Rossi). Given that we're working with time series, maybe it's a recurrent neural network?
But AI is definitely a big buzzword these days. I'm surprised Rossi isn't using blockchain. RossiCoin!
Sometimes the questions that Rossi doesn't answer are more telling than his answers.
For example, Rossi chose not to answer a question about whether the verifying entity would test the e-cat in their own lab, without Rossi's ongoing intervention.
Rossi said the verification entity will have access to the black box, but it turns out the box is BLUE!Quote
November 30, 2019 at 9:06 AM
You have already the photo in your head: imagine a blue cube with a side of 10 cm.
He never said they would have access to the white box!
- Merry Yogurt
November 28, 2019 at 8:28 AM
Do you think the name of the verifying entity will be easily recognizable by the public?
- Andrea Rossi
November 28, 2019 at 9:22 AM
I am sure, yes.
Obviously they will have access to the black box to verufy that there are not power sources of any kind.
- Merry Yogurt November 28, 2019 at 8:28 AM
Indeed, it is interesting to refresh our memories on the hype and speculation about the third party report in 2016:
To be clear, the report from the one-year trial, which has been controlled by a major independent third party certification institute, will be released only in about a month or two,
I think that was from the 1MW test, and the third party turned out to be Fabio Penon.
Regarding the certifying agency story, isn't that some kind of déjà-vu? I remember a story of a third party control a few years ago and it turned out to be some guy writing down numbers that Rossi gives him.
I find it ironic that, while moderators were considering halting all Rossi talk, they opened 3 more Rossi threads themselves! Now the conversation is split and there are 5 Rossi threads on the front page.
How about locking every thread but one?
I think it's fine
It's the subject of this thread after all
But am I the only
One to read Sam's posts
Like one would
It's perplexing that a lab would make 3 attempts without (I assume) contacting the one co-author who is pretty much available here 24/7 to check if they forgot anything important.
Nice slides. I hope a few experts were inspired enough to give this a try.
Who can forget M.Y.? It might feel like a while ago, yet it is so so close!
They're just moving nuclear active environments.