Posts by s_grey

    Thomas Clarke, i saw with my own eyes LENR effect. Moreover, several times. And, all fixed. I do not know why they can not. Maybe it's the preparation of the material. Probably
    should be pre-Ni and hydrogen, it is my Ni + H2 in the process of a
    gradual rise in temperature, a day or two, with a constant influx of H2.
    What with the processes taking place there do not know. Deceive and mislead no sense that he saw - and then describe.
    Here: http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-re…ht/next/4#experiment_13.0
    http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-re…ht/next/4#experiment_15.0
    Frequent is: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/ener…-28.10_.15-850-216s_.jpeg (at the time of cooling the heat emission).
    And besides me, there are successful experiments carried out with much better equipment. They're all lying?

    Attacks on LENR not just. Too simple system is obtained. Who does not want to lose the dividends. As a result - it is trying to slow down. Only the genie is already out of the bottle. Those who experience work - know works. The two conditions:
    1. Slow heating
    2. Before 1200..1300S temperature.
    If the reaction does not go - a sharp temperature drop at 50-100S. for start.
    All!
    And those who do not - violate (intentionally?) Some of the conditions.
    And the critics - do not conduct experiments. They just criticize, basically.

    When the end of the test, 1 MW, and the skeptic will quickly prove mathematically that the test can not be trusted ..
    More experiments any different - the way to the accumulation of statistical data. And then, and finished devices. What pleases - the effect does not require anything expensive.

    In my penultimate run the experiment turned out the reaction at a temperature of 1150, the usual cooling! Due to lack of power supply has to be insulated. 2 seconds lifted termo insulation - the temperature began to rise sharply. Power consumption has fallen (it with the period of averaging 120 seconds, did not immediately evident on the charts).


    In another experiment, after power and cooling - noted in the chart is the same surge - a sharp rise in t. And then I cleaned the insulation at this time! Unfortunately, I noticed only after the reactor has cooled down.


    I understand perfectly that my equipment is not perfect, and errors can occur. However, there is no need to exaggerate.

    Distinguished scientists, physicists. Try to experiment with the following parameters: Ni (no matter what though sawdust, although the nano-nickel) under hydrogen atmosphere, slowly heated up to 1200C, with a rate of 1 C / min. When the temperature of the reactor 1100-1200S turn off the power for a few seconds (temperature spike). I am sure will! Just try it. I did it happen!
    Here's a chart of today's experiment http://www.jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/16.1_.16_.jpghttp://www.jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/16.1_.16_1_.jpg


    14:50-15:35pm
    During the 40 minutes allocated an additional capacity of at least 100W. The graph output three times.

    Well, that "excess" heat. Within about 40 minutes. It gave additional power reactor, about .. (700-380) / 3 = 100Wt. And, little by little increased temperature (at a rate 1C / min - setting PID controller), and the power first increases, and then began to fall. On the chart you can see everything.


    http://www.jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/16.1_.16_.jpg
    http://www.jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/16.1_.16_1_.jpg


    I do it!

    Hydrogen is the simplest way I get - the electrolysis of lead electrodes in a solution of sulfuric acid. Here:
    http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/img_20160110.jpg, further dehydrate
    sodium chloride (picture - a small bottle with white powder). Moreover, I have made D, 6-liters of water made 2 electrolysis. However, since I lead electrodes - to them a few times (7-xx ??) output deuterium lower than "normal" hydrogen. This should be considered.


    In the first experiments used to monitor home-made electroscopes one set near the reactor, another put away. Any difference in the behavior of electroscopes noticed. No longer in control. There
    was also an attempt to make tube Geiger-Muller counter, but due to the
    inaccessibility of vakkuum-pump it is not completed. And now - thin-walled bulb of fluorescent lamps are near the reactor, just in case. If you light up, then it's time to write a will .. apparently.


    Radioactive materials are not available to me.


    LENR - a fairly simple device, you need only:
    1. hydrogenated nickel (you may need to add lithium, and is likely to graphite).
    To start the reaction:
    2. Sudden temperature changes (400C-300C-400C)
    3 and / or heating to 1100 ° C..-1400 C.
    ALL!
    No need to complicate the design.

    60% of nickel oxide, 15% graphite, 20% of an unknown composition of the Ni-Mh battery (it seems there is lithium, in the analysis of spontaneous
    combustion of dark red color, washed distilled water). Still, 5% of flour. Diluted with distilled water to a dough shaped state, sliding balls to be loaded into the ceramic tube (6 mm internal diameter).
    After heating at temperatures up to 50C (2 hours). Then the process of transformation of nickel oxide in nickel in a hydrogen atmosphere, etc. All of the graphs: http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-re…ht/next/4#experiment_12.0


    More over, in 11 my experiment, at about 1000C insulation opened reactor - the temperature began to grow briskly. Unfortunately, I only then saw. And by the time the reactor is cooled. Did not continue the experiment - interference on the thermocouple due to leaks (?) Is strongly disturbed.

    In Pakhomov experiment on 12/20/2014 at 970 C COP was 0.99, and for 1150 - 1.92.
    For many others the same noticeable heat starts from 1100-1200 C.


    And in my experiment melting metal tube reactor was at T> 1100 thermocouple.
    Sometimes the heat is released at lower temperatures, but for some reason it is not always and in a very small amount, on the verge of sensitivity (errors).


    They're with incomprehensible tenacity above 800 C does not raise the temperature.


    And yet - it is desirable to run the reaction, the quench and heat. Step into 50-100gr. With sufficient. They do not do the same! Apparently the magnetic field from the heater coil weak to start the reaction.
    But I have in the last and penultimate experiments was the effect, that by sudden temperature changes.

    After quenching t400C to 330c (a) there is a slight decrease in power consumption of the heater. Reactor I insulated (heat resistant cotton). If this is not an error (differently put cotton wool) - obvious effect. Still, perhaps the measurement error. An important detail - the thermocouple tube is an end, not kontachit with the catalyst mixture (fuel). Here's today's schedule of the experiment: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/9.1_.16_1_.jpg
    Tomorrow to continue gradually raising the temperature from 120 ° C to 400 under the same conditions. (chart power = Power * 3).
    p.s. Dlyastabilnogo obtain the effect, it is desirable to heat up to 1200-1400 C! Unfortunately, my supply does not produce the required output .. You have to go to all sorts of tricks.

    In physics, a lot of "unexplained" phenomena. For example - of the two strips of lead-sulfuric acid battery do. Charge, measure the amount of energy, and then discharged. And after - raise the temperature and ?? EMF increased! Discharge, again measuring the amount of energy, even stand up at a high temperature, measure the back emf discharge, and so the circle many times. Question on filling - where does the energy come from? Is the direct conversion of heat into electricity? But thermodynamics forbids it.
    Maybe
    "engine Bedini" works on the same principle, but he does not want to
    pass for an idiot and invents all sorts of different buzzwords?

    The vast majority of breakthrough technologies is enthusiastic at his own expense, without any "donations" from the outside. And various bad people love to organize funds and pyramid. Hiding behind the lofty phrases of care "around the world", under the guise of appointing themselves high salaries that they earn their livelihood in the first place. It is possible that even perepadet researchers - crumbs, and not the fact.


    Do you want to do? Do! You do not need to inquire handouts in the form of funding. Money for the last place, the main thing - the process itself.

    I came to the conclusion that a universal controller is quite difficult to do. Too wide range of temperatures and applied power. I went on a simple way - the coefficients for different temperature ranges will be changed directly in the process. There's the most important thing - the power consumption is calculated fairly accurately. For this and moved on microcontroller operation.
    And another problem in the program published above - out of range of the variable Out. Glitches removed until the new found. Working.

    The algorithm above two mistakes.
    1.Out = (P_Term + I_Term + D_Term);
    1.2.Out = (P_Term + I_Term - D_Term);
    And under certain conditions in averaging occurs division by 0.
    I have found how to configure. Simple and accessible and understandable. Lock google "PID Without a PhD"!