The only way to "draw out" any heat would be shut the shipping container doors, and if there were actually 1 MW of heat being generated then shutting the doors would "keep in" about a hundred times more heat than the air conditioner could draw out.
A standard unisolated steel shipping container can dissipated many kWh's. If you ever slept inside a military tank then you know how much heat is needed to "warm" a can!
IF the doors are left open THEN the air conditioning cannot do a bit of good. It will cool the air inside the container, warm the air of the room, and the air from the room will come into the box, making everything warmer.
This is only true if the outside (unisolated building - thin walls high K value) is warmer than the inside...
IF the doors are shut, the waste heat even from a 20 kW reaction will overwhelm the air conditioner, making the inside of the container even warmer than it would be when the doors are open.
This was a silly joke...
1 MW I-cat Version 1:
1 MW I-cat Version 2:
To make a final attempt to stop al FUD discussion about the heat released in the 1 MW container, I will try to make a calculation that is based on certified assumptions.
My home boiler, 400 liters, releases at 95C degrees versus ambient 20C degrees - certified - 3kWh a day. The isolation is medium and is comparable to the thickness of the E-cat modules isolation. His dimensions are (L,Radius: 172cm,36cm). Remember delta T = 75C!
One problem we face is, that Rossi used two completely different 1 MW buildups (See photos, check the structure) one has 56 modules the other only 42.
If we take the 42 units 1 MW version, which should be the newer design, then we can set the numbers of boiler equivalent (42) be equal to the number of E-cat elements. (6 x 172cm fits well into the length – 12meters - of the container)
Thus if the ambient temperature in Florida is in average around 27C and the outside conducting E-cat surface is at steam-temperature (102C) then 42 X 3 kWh/day are dissipated. This gives about 5.2 kWh/hour.
What are the up/down-sides?
Down's: 1/6 of the E-cats surface goes directly to the outside because it is in contact with the container wall. Thus we are down to 4.3kWh.
Other downs: Did all modules work or were some spare parts?
Up's: If the internal surface temperature is eg. 127C (+25C) then this multiplies the wattage by 1.33 (*4.3) = 5.7kWh.
This is very, very far away from the FUD-erated 50kWh.. for the 1MW version - even at 200C degrees, we are below 10kWh.