Anyone heard anything lately regarding ultradense hydrogen? Papers, articles, interviews?
milton
Member
- Member since Jun 7th 2016
Posts by milton
-
-
That’s a tweet from ICCF24, not from Elon…
Here’s the link
ICCF24 on Twitter“Solid-state energy is THE opportunity to push the boundaries of clean energy — especially with incentives like the @xprize Carbon Removal competition!…mobile.twitter.comElon did not say anything here, ICCF24 tweeted a link to xprize.org which shows up as a thumbnail with Elon
-
If this is true, IMO it is not so "positive", if trustful investors are taken onboard and then the company, for whatever reason, runs into to bankruptcy.
A few month later a new company is setup and continues the same business. This is not fair and IMO not a good business practice, especially when it is stated that
"...A few of the board members from Norront also seem to be on the board on Lazerah..."
If you suspect fraud, mismanagement or something similar then I agree with you, then it's not positive that the same persons start a similar company after the first one defaults... But no one have suggested fraud or similar here as far as I know.
Disregarding fraud, I think it is positive that the people involved try again after a first startup fails.
Startups fail for a multitude of reasons. Founders disagree, fundraising fails and cash run out, etc... The numbers show the vast majority of startups fail – "9 out of 10 is gone within 5 years" is an often mentioned statistics for new venture-funded startups here in the Nordics.
You might feel it is not "fair" or "good business practice" that investors come on board in good faith and the company then defaults, but that is the reality for investments in early stage venture. Most simply fail.
The fact that the people involved start a new company again is positive in my eyes. It is good that they believe in the technology, it is good that they don't give up. -
That sounds very familiar to me.... Didn't he (Holmlid) try to achieve the same with Norront? Why a new company and Norront was sent to bancruptcy?
Any logic behind this?
I believe Holmlid first started with the company Ultrafusion in Sweden. During the same time Sindre/Dag Z-G started Norront in Norway based on Holmlid’s research. They decided to merge the companies under the Norront name, but after a couple of years Norront failed. Don’t know the details why.
I think it is positive that Holmlid has not given up and is starting again now with Lazerah. A few of the board members from Norront also seem to be on the board on Lazerah.
-
That made me wonder whether release of EM radiation ever has been reported in the case of atoms having Rydberg state that return to 'normal' state.
You probably know this, but Sveinn Olafsson mentions in his presentation at ICCF-23 (10 min into the presentation) that the first thing Leif Holmlid sees during experiments is a big flash of light.
-
If you want further information about what Deuterium Energetics is doing and how (consistent with reasonable IP concerns) contact the company on its website or [email protected].
You also may be interested in the recently reported NASA work on "confinement fusion" the same term we used when Jim Loan et al discovered the reaction in 2005. This is the URL and the article is attached: https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/spac…ttice-confinement-fusion/
NASA’s work clearly supports and validates what Deuterium Energetics has been asserting since 2005, that at the molecular and atomic level concepts of temperature and pressure are not well understood and that confinement of deuterium at the atomic level can overcome the Coulomb forces and create the conditions needed to induce fusion.
Hi steveincreston and jfloan173,
Would you be able to give us a short update on what is happening now with Deuterium Energetics? How did the patent process go?
-
I realised Sindre is a member here, so trying a friendly ping here SindreZG.
Your suggestion for a workshop would be very interesting! Is that still something you would like to do? -
I would be interested to get some deeper insight here ..
I agree, has anyone any contact with Sindre?
It would be great if he would do the workshop he suggested earlier.
-
No more news from Sindre - we are waiting patiently.
Ok, thanks for the update
-
If enough people are interested i could probably hold a workshop on preperation, reactor construction, activation, and detection.
Any news about this, are there enough people interested?
-
There are numerous articles on muon detectors at ResearchGate.
This one seems an interesting one (for those who have access to the full article).
Abstract
Almost all experimental apparatuses at existing colliders employ large muon systems located after all other subdetectors. Given the large size of most of the experimental detectors, the existing muon system has to cover areas of a few thousand square meters. It can be anticipated that future detectors at future colliders will be even larger in size. Therefore, for a practical reason of cost, the most suited detectors to realize these large muon systems are gas detectors. In particular, in recent years, Micro-Pattern Gas Detectors (MPGDs) have enjoyed very interesting developments, providing several new types of detectors with very good spacial and time resolution, high-rate capability and high radiation tolerance. MPGDs also have the distinct advantage of being, at least for some detectors and some parts of them, mass produceable by industry, since they employ materials and manufacturing procedures that are extensively used for Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) production. A particularly innovative MPGD, the μRWell, is described as a possible candidate to build large muon systems for future colliders. The results obtained so far with this new technology are reported.
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 654168.
The designer is member of the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy.
There are 5 references to the article at the same page of the link given above. Two of those have full access articles.
A reliable muon detector would of course be great to prove/disprove Holmlid’s hypothesis that lots of (something like ~10^13) muons are emitted per laser shot.
But are there other methods?
Let’s say you have access to a Holmlid reactor and a good lab - what experiment would you run?
-
Thank you Sindre for your generous offer! Everything at LENR Forum is about sharing knowledge so we can move forward!
Any news regarding this? It would be very interesting.
-
If enough people are interested i could probably hold a workshop on preperation, reactor construction, activation, and detection.
That would be very interesting, I would join 👍
-
I still feel this really needs to be reproduced and checked. If the same voltage effect in air can be observed without co-deposition (albeit at a lower distance) it might tell something about what is going on.
What did you do when you got the voltage effect without co-deposition – Can you describe the process?
-
I have good reason to believe that there is no problem with Holmlid's work, however, there are problems with who gets what slice of the pie. I hope the work will go on.
Any more information about this SindreZG Alan Smith?
I personally don’t care why the company is being closed, but I am interested in this area and would like to know if the research activity continues
-
What is the status of your research SindreZG? Do you have funding, or is that an issue?
-
Great to hear 👍
If you are in Europe, this site has a lot of o-rings including the size you search for:
https://www.o-ring-stocks.eu/o…-80-shore-a-brown-ors6225 -
can - In the first post of this thread (~2,5 years ago) you wrote that your understanding is that potassium ferrite (KFeO2) is the compound of interest, and that it is formed during various conditions including heating the catalyst to ~600 degrees.
Can I ask – is that still your understanding, or has it changed with the last years’ papers on the subject?
-
I was able to purchase 0.5 kg from that source some years ago. I had it analyzed by a very good lab:
K2O 63.2 %
FeOx 32.8 %
CaO 2.8 %
CeO2 1.2 %
Mg trace
Here's the manufacturer's product sheet:
Thanks - Did you run Holmlid-inspired experiments back then? If so, were there any positive/negative results worth mentioning?
-
I've also been told that Leif Holmlid has been using Shell 105-equivalent catalysts from BASF (...)
Current selection of styrene catalysts from BASF: https://catalysts.basf.com/ind…hemical/styrene-catalysts