Absorptive reactions with prompt reactions - low energy neutrons are typically detected indirectly through absorption reactions. Typical absorber materials used have high cross sections for absorption of neutrons and include helium-3, lithium-6, boron-10, and uranium-235.
Among the known particles, the neutron takes a special position, as it provides experimental access to all four fundamental forces and a wide range of hypothetical interactions. Despite being unstable, free neutrons live long enough to be used as test particles in interferometric, spectroscopic, and scattering experiments probing low-energy scales.
As was already recognized in the 1970s, fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics can be tested in neutron interferometry using silicon perfect-single-crystals.
Besides allowing for tests of uncertainty relations, Bell inequalities and alike, neutrons offer the opportunity to observe the effects of gravity and hypothetical dark forces acting on extended matter wave functions.
Such tests gain importance in the light of recent discoveries of inconsistencies in our understanding of cosmology as well as the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and general relativity.
Experiments with
low-energy neutrons
are thus indispensable tools for probing fundamental physics and represent a complementary approach to colliders.
In this review we discuss the history and experimental methods used at this low-energy frontier of physics and collect bounds and limits on quantum mechanical relations and dark energy interactions.
Comments: Extended Version of review article "Tests of Fundamental Quantum Mechanics and Dark Interactions with Low Energy Neutrons", 26 pages, 6 figures
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2012.09048 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2012.09048v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
Among the known particles, the neutron takes a special position, as it
provides experimental access to all four fundamental forces and a wide range of…
Low-energy neutrons are key for understanding fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics and physics beyond the standard model. This Review addresses topics…
The neutron detection temperature, also called the neutron energy, indicates a free neutron's kinetic energy, usually given in electron volts. The term temperature is used, since hot, thermal and cold neutrons are moderated in a medium with a certain temperature. The neutron energy distribution is then adapted to the Maxwellian distribution known for thermal motion. Qualitatively, the higher the temperature, the higher the kinetic energy of the free neutrons. The momentum and wavelength of the neutron are related through the de Broglie relation. The large wavelength of slow neutrons allows for the large cross section.[1]
The origins of the high-energy cosmic neutrino flux remain largely unknown. Recently, one high-energy neutrino was associated with a tidal disruption event (TDE). Here we present AT2019fdr, an exceptionally luminous TDE candidate, coincident with another high-energy neutrino. Our observations, including a bright dust echo and soft late-time x-ray emission, further support a TDE origin of this flare. The probability of finding two such bright events by chance is just 0.034%. We evaluate several models for neutrino production and show that AT2019fdr is capable of producing the observed high-energy neutrino, reinforcing the case for TDEs as neutrino sources.
It can be hard to imagine what happens to common molecules under the extreme conditions on other planets. For example, Earthlings know water as an essential ingredient for life that exists as a solid, liquid and gas. However, scientists examining how water behaves under different conditions have identified about 20 different types of ice. The most recent addition to this list is “superionic ice,” which is thought to be the main form of ice on water-rich planets like Uranus and Neptune.
A Solid and a Liquid
Quote
Superionic ice is unique because the oxygen atoms lock into place like a solid, but the hydrogen atoms give up their electrons to become positively charged ions that flow through the oxygen lattice like a fluid. Because the water molecules break apart — unlike other known types of ice — some scientists consider it a new state of matter rather than a new phase of water.
End Quotes
gbgoblenote We have sliced the study of the atom into a dozen or so Branches of Physics yet all fall under the overarching branches of the Atom. - end gbgoblenote
This article answer the questions: "What is Physics?" and "What are the branches of Physics?" Learn about what physics is and its many different branches.
owlcation.com
STEM
HUMANITIES
ACADEMIA
SOCIAL SCIENCES
AGRICULTURE & FARMING
Physics: Definition and Branches
MUHAMMAD RAFIQOCT 26, 2021
Muhammad Rafiq is a freelance writer, blogger, and translator with a master's degree in English literature from the University of Malakand.
physics-definition-and-branches
John Moeses Bauan, CC0, via Unsplash
What Is Physics?
The word physics is derived from the Latin word physica, which means "natural thing."
Quote
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, physics is defined as:
Definition of "Physics" by the Oxford English Dictionary
"The branch of science concerned with the nature and properties of matter and energy. The subject matter of physics includes mechanics, heat, light and other radiation, sound, electricity, magnetism, and the structure of atoms."
Another definition by the digital encyclopedia Microsoft Encarta describes physics as:
“A major science dealing with the fundamental constituents of the universe, the forces they exert on one another, and the results produced by these forces. Sometimes in modern physics a more sophisticated approach is taken that incorporates elements of the three areas listed above; it relates to the laws of symmetry and conservation, such as those pertaining to energy, momentum, charge, and parity."
What these definitions indicate is that physics is a branch of science that deals with the properties of matter and energy and the relationship between them. It also tries to explain the material world and the natural phenomena of the universe.
The scope of physics is very wide and vast. It deals with not only the tinniest particles of atoms, but also natural phenomenon like the galaxy, the milky way, solar and lunar eclipses, and more. While it is true that physics is a branch of science, there are many sub-branches within the field of physics. In this article, we will explore each of them in depth.
What Are the Branches of Physics?
While there are more branches sprouting up as science and technology progresses, there are generally 11 branches of physics. These are as follows.
Branches of Physics
Classical physics
Modern physics
Nuclear physics
Atomic physics
Geophysics
Biophysics
Mechanics
Acoustics
Optics
Thermodynamics
Astrophysics
Display More
End Quotes
"Tritium Measurements by Nuclear Reaction Analysis Using 3He Beam in the Energy Range Between 0.7 MeV and 5.1 MeV"
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Abstract
A solid thick tritiated W sample was produced in order to probe the efficiency of detecting tritium via ³He ion beam using nuclear reactions analysis (NRA). Extensive literature search showed that there were only a few measurements done more than sixty years ago using the reaction with ³He. Their aim was mainly to measure the absolute cross section of the reaction. In order to use this reaction as an analysing tool for low level radioactive waste we need the differential cross section at certain angles. Using a thick tritiated W sample we measured the NRA signal in the ³He energy range from 0.7 MeV to 5.1 MeV and we have detected reaction products with energies between 6.5 MeV and 9.75 MeV that were not present on a deuterated W sample prepared in the same manner. This NRA signal proved to be due to deuterium and protons coming from the nuclear reaction between tritium and ³He. The detection signal increased with ³He energy up to 3.4 MeV and decreased with energy at the highest beam energies. At higher energies particles from W and target impurities start to disturb the measurement. Their origin might be due to other nuclear reactions, for example between ³He and W or ³He with ¹³C or ¹⁴N.
August 2021Nuclear Materials and Energy 28(1):101057
DOI:10.1016/j.nme.2021.101057
Project: TRANSAT
TRANSversal Actions for Tritium
gbgoblenote
Background
TRANSversal Actions for Tritium
Fact Sheet
Project Information TRANSAT
Grant agreement ID: 754586
DOI - 10.3030/754586
Closed project
Start date 1 September 2017
End date 28 February 2022
Funded under Euratom
Total cost € 5 092 616,10
Authors:
Sabina Markelj, Jožef Stefan Institute
M. Payet, E. Bernard, M. Lipoglavsek, Mitja Kelemen, Jožef Stefan Institute
Aleksandra Cvetinović, Jožef Stefan Institute
C. Grisolia, Atomic Energy and Alternative Energies Commission
Primož Pelicon, Jožef Stefan Institute
The Jožef Stefan Institute (IJS, JSI) (Slovene: Institut "Jožef Stefan") is the largest research institute in Slovenia. The main research areas are physics, chemistry, molecular biology, biotechnology, information technologies, reactor physics, energy and environment. At the beginning of 2013 the institute had 962 employees, of whom 404 were PhD scientists.
The mission of the Jožef Stefan Institute is the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge at the frontiers of natural science and technology for the benefit of society at large through the pursuit of education, learning, research, and development of high technology at the highest international levels of excellence.
Electron screening enhances nuclear reaction cross sections at low energies. We studied the nuclear reaction 1H(19F,αγ)16O in inverse kinematics in different solid hydrogen targets. Measured resonance strengths differed by up to a factor of 10 in different targets. We also studied the 2H(p,γ)3He fusion reaction and observed electrons emitted as reaction products instead of γ rays. In this case electron screening greatly enhances internal conversion probability.
We are back in congratulating the EU Commission in investing €10 million into the research on Cold Fusion, this time Smut Clyde takes over.
He will introduce you to several quacks and an occasional actual criminal, to complement the learned gentlemen of cold fusion “science” like the EU-funded Francesco Celani whom I introduced before. I am sure the expertise of these characters will be hotly appreciated by the academic partners of the two new FET research projects by the EU Commission (Hermes and CleanHME). Those are about reviving the 1989 discovery of Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, which was definitely never research fraud but Cold Fusion, or rather low energy nuclear reactions (LENR) or hydrogen–metal energy (HME), as it is called nowadays to avoid ridicule. I personally prefer the acronym “FuF” (pronounced fooff, from Italian “fusione fredda”), which was established by the mitica Sylvie Coyaud. FuF is truly the right way to describe these people.
At the 29 minute mark through to the 31 minute mark Carl Page speaks about a paper he received from a researcher in the Crimea and then talks about how LENR/Solid-State Fusion is taking place deep in the Earth.
Do you have the link to the paper?
Thanks
I also thank you for your works and enjoy studying them.
Source
National Geographic is a popular American monthly magazine published by the National Geographic Society. Known for its photojournalism, it is one of the most widely read magazines of all time.
Were giant stone balls in western Kazakhstan created by underground lightning?
www.nationalgeographic.org
Your connection to this site is secure
ARTICLE
"These Barren Plains Hold a Mystery No One Can Crack"
Out of Eden Walk, National Geographic Magazine
Jun 16, 2016 — Gennadiy Tarasenko says underground lightning strikes created the rock nodules strewn about the steppes. Photograph by Paul Salopek.
A bit of history from the article.
Quote
Most scientists believe the balls develop over millennia as minerals in liquid solution cement themselves together around a nucleus of debris—a pebble, a fossil—much in the manner of an oyster coating a particle of grit to form a pearl. (This part of Kazakhstan once was an ancient seabed.)
But Gennadiy Tarasenko disagrees.
Tarasenko, a gangly geologist from the regional capital of Aktau, thinks Mangystau’s trademark concretions are the result of electricity in the Earth’s crust. According to his theory, underground lightning strikes many miles long—sparked by volcanism and plate shifts—create “plasma fireballs” that then accrete minerals.
“These balls roll between layers of rock,” Tarasenko says. “They are like millstones grinding the rocks to flour.”
Tarasenko’s hypothesis is complicated and infinitely less boring than the conventional explanation. He also believes the Earth is hollow. In his makeshift lab in Aktau, a gardeners’ shed on the grounds of a local university, he uses salvaged parts from a disassembled Soviet nuclear power plant to test his ideas. Connecting raw copper wires to an aging dynamo—“The whole Earth is a dynamo!”—he fired up his equipment one recent afternoon and made a tiny blue lightning bolt sizzle between steel plates. He warned the university’s maintenance man before throwing the switch in case the demonstration caused a blackout.
Out on the steppes of Mangystau the concretions loom like alien monoliths.
Some are halved like oranges. Others glom together into cartoon heads, into mammoth sexual organs, into fantasy menageries. They are objects of waiting.
I stride among them on my walk to Uzbekistan. I camp in their pale blue spheroid shade. Sometimes, I pause to listen for subterranean rumbling—Tarasenko’s planetary ball bearings on the move—but all I hear is the wind.
Display More
Also of relevance to Carl Page's reference paper.
From page 32
INFINITE ENERGY • ISSUE 141 • SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2018
Quote
Gennadiy Tarasenko and a colleague from Caspian State
University of Technologies and Engineering had a poster on
“The Mechanism of Formation of LENR in Earth’s Crust.” It
was a development of Tarasenko’s presentations at earlier
ICCFs. They envision this process: “Rotation of sub-surface
geospheres generates electricity and is responsible for the
dynamo effect of planet Earth.” The large-scale currents are
viewed as the source of the earth’s field with associated dis-
charges that can cause earthquakes and various geological
formations. They wrote, “This LENR process is possible
because of the presence of plasmas of various forms, which
possess both gravitational and magnetic fields and are able
to process the surrounding material into geological bodies of
different types.” The team conducted laboratory experi-
ments to simulate geophysical conditions. These were
described: “Inside a simple reactor chamber, a pressured
environment was created in the presence of a magnetic field
and electric discharges. After the initial excitation of electri-
cal discharges, a voltage appeared on the stator, which sug-
gests the formation of a condenser-like structure inside the
reactor.” That structure is thought to be similar to what
War and planetary take-over by the deep-state/military industrial/AI/transhumanist bots, borgs and humans, projected by 2025 and being implemented now on…
War and planetary take-over by the deep-state/military industrial/AI/transhumanist bots, borgs and humans, projected by 2025 and being implemented now on…
archive.org
Also an article posted on
Valentine's Day 2014
"Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025] Dennis Bushnell – NASA – LENR"
Carl says because of the big big BIG money making potential (quote "people act funny") there is a lack of transparency (research and data) about what makes it work. Many examples come to my mind.
Indian Head Division had this to say about the problem of lack of transparency. In their presentation. Indian Head openly admits that even the presentation they are giving has limitations (restrictions) placed upon them.
Obviously a restriction whose goal is to limit transparency will cloud facts and misdirect perceptions, i.e. public opinion.
Who restricts team Google from writing an in depth Nature article about their research into and pursuit of solid state CMNS energy technology patents?
The boss does is my best guess.
This is what Indian Head is allowed to say about the lack of transparency at ARPA-E. A few well known researchers have subsequently made similar commentary.
ARPA-E LENR Workshop
NSWC presentation
Friday, October 22 at 11:15 am
HIVER* Electrochemistry Energy Project Update *(2H-Pd-Li Versatile-modeling & Evaluation of Results)
Oliver Barham, PhD, Project Manager
Carl Gotzmer, ST (SES Tier 1), Senior Scientist
Ken Conley, Business Development Lead
Lou DeChiaro, PhD, Lead Physicist
Employees of NSWC Indian Head Division
ARPA-E Indian Head Division (slide 2)
LENR Field Issues (edit/problems)
& Potential Solutions
Quote
Lack of transparency by researchers
– Every group has limitations: even our own presentation today
Next in their presentation, on the solution to the problems and issues of pursuing patents, they advise to publish the results, don't cherry pick the data (hide important parts), and openly discuss prosaic explanations. (discuss what works)
ARPA-E Indian Head Division (slide 3)
LENR Field Issues (edit/problems)
& Potential Solutions
Quote
– Get patents if necessary; then publish results
– Openly discuss alternate (prosaic) explanations for anomalies
• No need to cherry-pick results
Team Overview (slide 4)
Quote
*Indian Head Roles
• Conducted experiments and coordinated results from all performers
• Present(ed) results to entire team for internal review
• Present(ed) team’s results and conclusions to DARPA
For further reading and a bit of history.
LENR PHENOMENA AND POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS, PROFESSOR PETER HAGELSTEIN AND DR. LOUIS DECHIARO
Louis F. DeChiaro was awarded the Ph.D. Degree in Physics in 1979 from Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey. From 1979 to 2002, he served as an Electronics Engineer / researcher in the telecommunications industry at Bell Laboratories and Telcordia Technologies, retiring in 2002 as a Distinguished Member of the Technical Staff. From 2002 to 2006, he served as an Associate Professor of Computational Science and a founding member of the new Computational Science Program at The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey.
He joined the US Navy as a civilian Physicist in September, 2006 and since 2009 been performing investigations in LENR physics and supporting the EMC efforts of Branch Q51 at the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, VA.
During the period 2010-2012 he was on special assignment at the Naval Research Labs, Washington, D.C. in their experimental LENR group.
ARPA-E, or Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy is a United States government agency tasked with promoting and funding research and development of advanced energy technologies. It is modeled after the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Electric Propulsion... For decades the daydream of high power electric propulsion has envisioned humans rapid space expansion.
Simply put...
The ability for us to get out there in one fourth the time, or less.
Continuous thrust with a fraction of the fuel weight.
Imagine approximately...
100 Mw LENR Electric could power 1,000 of these100 kW X3 Nested Channel Hall Thrusters delivering 5,400 Newtons of thrust for a long long time.
I'd hope to find someone at the playground who.could estimate some flight times for a Starship so equipped, using total loaded estimated weight by Space X.
Quote
The highest power Hall-effect thruster in development is the University of Michigan's 100 kW X3 Nested Channel Hall Thruster. The thruster is approximately 80 cm in diameter and weighs 230 kg, and has demonstrated a thrust of 5.4 N. - Wikipedia
"Implementation and Initial Validation of a 100-kW Class Nested-channel Hall Thruster"
Future plays on new oil leases can take a decade before extraction sales.
Will these pay off with the advent of CMNS Energy Technologies entering the market now?
A slew of new US leases just opened up.
Biden administration to hold its first oil drilling lease sales on federal lands
BY RACHEL FRAZIN 06/28/22
Source The Hill is an American newspaper and digital media company based in Washington, D.C. that was founded in 1994. In 2020, it was the largest independent political news site in the United States.
Curious about how long they were working on this before HERMES.
The earliest I've found so far.
A bit of history.... Also a wealth of expertise... Impressive skill set.
2004
"The 2H(d,p)3H Reaction in Metallic Media at Very Low Energies"
K. Czerski1,2, A. Huke1, P. Heide1 and G. Ruprecht1
Published 16 October 2004 • 2004 EDP Sciences
Europhysics Letters, Volume 68, Number 3
Citation K. Czerski et al 2004 EPL 68 363
Abstract
Based on our experimental studies of the electron screening effect in the 2H(d,p)3H reaction for five deuteron-implanted solid targets (C,Al,Zr,Pd,Ta), theoretical calculations have been performed within an improved dielectric function theory. The theory describes correctly the observed target material dependence of the screening energies, underestimating, however, the absolute values by about a factor of 2. Applying an effective screening energy approach, the theoretical cross-sections, thick-target yields as well as nuclear reaction rates have been calculated down to the energies corresponding to the conditions of so-called cold-fusion experiments. This allows for a comparison of the experimental results at higher energies with those achieved in the heavy-water electrolysis expericontainment
Source.EPI - A Letters Journal Exploring the Frontiers of Physics
Interesting that I continue to think CMNS research will yield improved targets, better containment (at lower energies) for hot fusion designs.
I realize this might be a misguided thought of mine. Just a hunch.
Curious also about the contributions of the MIT CleanHME team. Peter Hagelstein gave the opening lecture at the first meeting of the consortium.
Source
The University of Szczecin is a public university in Szczecin, western Poland. It is the biggest university in West Pomerania, with 33,267 students and a staff of nearly 1,200.
Clean Energy from Hydrogen-Metal Systems - Sep 22, 2020
Opening Lecture
"History of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions" P. Hagelstein, MIT, USA
Breakthrough zero-emissions energy generation for full decarbonization
23.09.-25.09.2020, University of Szczecin, Poland
The main aim of the project is to develop a new, clean, safe, compact and very efficient energy source based on Hydrogen-Metal systems, which could be a breakthrough for both private use as well as for industrial applications.
Organizers:
Institute of Physics Faculty of Physical, Mathematical and Natural Sciences
University of Szczecin, Poland ul. Wielkopolska 15, 70-451 Szczecin
Organizing Committee:
K. Czerski, N. Targosz-Ślęczka, M. Kaczmarski, A. Kowalska, Edyta Kowalczyk-Łuc
Combination of the face-to-face conference and on-line participation (MS Teams platform)
10:30 Opening Lecture: History of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (P. Hagelstein, MIT, USA, 30’ talk, recorded)
11:00 Plenary Lecture: Present Status and Perspectives of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (J. Kasagi Tohoku University, Japan, 25’ talk + 5’ discussion)
11:30 Clean Energy from Hydrogen-Metal Systems: Problems to Solve (K. Czerski, University of Szczecin, Poland)
12:00 HERMES Project, (Pekka Peljo, University of Turku, Finnland)
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Sprawozdanie z działalności Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego - 2019
"The research team of prof. In 2019, Konrad Czerski prepared two applications for funding research under: • Horizon 2020: CleanHME aimed at the development of energy technologies related to the use of cold fusion, for the amount of PLN 25 130 013.75. This application has been approved by the European Commission, and contracts between the consortium members are currently being prepared. The University of Szczecin is the leader of this project involving 17 entities from all over the world."
A very significant paper has been published by Konrad Czserki about threshold resonance of deuterons fusion at extremely low energies
Thanks for the link. The honorable Czserki has been working with extremely low energy irradiation CMNS experimentation since before 2011. This work seems to hold a priori to similar works done at NASA LCF. A comparative analysis to be made by others more skilled than I might confirm or negate my initial take on this.
International Journal of Modern Physics EVol. 20, No. 02, pp. 576-581 (2011)
ISOSPIN SYMMETRY BREAKING AND BRANCHING RATIO IN THE DEUTERON REACTIONS AT VERY LOW ENERGIES
A.I. KILIÇ, K. CZERSKI, P. HEIDE, A. HUKE, G. RUPRECHT and N. TARGOSZ-ŚLȨCZKA
The target-material dependence of the neutron-proton branching ratio and breaking of the isospin symmetry in the the 2H(d, n)3He and 2H(d, p)3H reactions at…
The target-material dependence of the neutron-proton branching ratio and breaking of the isospin symmetry in the the 2H(d, n)3He and 2H(d, p)3H reactions at very low deuteron energies have been investigated. Angular distributions and total cross sections of the proton and neutron mirror channels have been measured for nuclear reactions taking place in different metallic environments. For Sr, Li, Na targets, we have found a first evidence for an alteration of the neutron-proton branching ratio and angular anisotropy of the neutron channel. We discuss various theoretical approaches explaining isospin mixing effects both in gas and metallic target experiments including a deuteron polarization in the crystal lattice. Direct reaction contribution has been calculated within the zero range distorted wave Born approximation (DWBA).
Cold fusion is a proposed[1] type of nuclear reaction which would occur at relatively low temperatures compared to hot fusion. As a new type of nuclear reaction, it was proposed to explain reports by experimenters of anomalously high energy generation under certain specific laboratory conditions. It has been rejected by the mainstream scientific community because the original experimental results could not be replicated consistently and reliably, and because there is no generally accepted theoretical explanation that accounts for the lack of nuclear byproducts.
Reverse Mössbauer effect
Feb 2022
Ettore Ruberti
In 1989 two electrochemists, Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, published an article in which they hypothesized anomalous nuclear effects in condensed matter, in particular neutron emissions from a super-saturated hydrogen palladium crystal lattice. This made them speculate that it was a new phenomenon of nuclear fusion, a phenomenon that a repor...
Anomalies in Nuclear Physic
Jan 2022
Péter Kálmán
Tamás Keszthelyi
It is shown that seemingly diverse problems, such as the riddles in astrophysics and cosmology (a star that formed shortly after the Big Bang), anomalous internal pair creation and the problem of low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR) may have common origin that needs refinement in the quantum mechanical description of interacting nuclei that can be m...
Formation of Rhenium and Tantalum During Electrolysis of Distilled Water Using Tungsten Electrodes and the Expected Isotope Ratio
Jan 2022
Mikhail Petrovich Kashchenko
Pechorsky Vi
Kashchenko Nm[...]
Pushin Vg
Go to The original installation for plasma electrolysis of water demonstrated, according to [1], an example of the implementation of low-energy nuclear reactions of the synthesis of chemical elements with low erosion of electrodes. That is, the initial material for the formation of chemical elements was water, and the product was a solid fraction i...
CFRL News No.115
Jan 2022
Hideo Kozima
This issue contains the following items: 1. Season’s Greetings to All Researchers in the Cold Fusion Research Field 2. My paper “A Sketch of the Solid State-Nuclear Sciences,” was presented at the 23rd International Conference on the Cold Fusion. 3. Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions Workshop by ARPAE, DOE, USA
I suppose CleanHME EU has it's own thread... this could be moved there or to the ICCF-24 thread...
I intend to research these folks soon,.. papers, patents, companies and skill sets of those involved. With a little help I am certain they could successfully enter the market soon.
CleanHME - US?
Is anyone working on this?
Such a consortium could be created in the US to seek DoE funding. Perhaps Brillouin Energy Corporation, and others deserve ARPA-E funding. Pressure could be put to challenge their (BEC) recent ARPA-E rejection. Seems to me that Larry Page and Lawrence Forsley could act as spokespersons for the group and open some doors into the DoE considering their long-standing CMNS research partnerships with DoE and other US National Laboratories.