Posts by gio06



From "The Electron and Occam's Razor":
"By using the electromagnetic fourpotential as a “Materia Prima” a natural connection between electromagnetic
concepts and Newtonian and relativistic mechanics seems to be possible. The vector potential should not be viewed
only as a pure mathematical tool to evaluate spatial electromagnetic field distributions but as a real physical entity, as
suggested by the Aharonov–Bohm effect, a quantum mechanical phenomenon in which a charged particle is affected
by the vector potential in regions in which the electromagnetic fields are null"

Zitterbewegung is scalar motion, it should have no magnetism attributed.
Not exactly. In the proposed Zitterbewegung model the elementary charge e is always associated with a magnetic flux Φ_{M}:
_{}
Φ_{M}=h/e
_{}

In Chapter4, using Clifford spacetime algebra Cl_{3,1}(ℝ), is proposed an intuitive/simple fully electromagnetic interpretation of relativistic mass, De Broglie, KleinGordon, Dirac, Proca and AharonovBohm equations together with some hypotheses on ultradense hydrogen and LENR.
A poster on the book has been presented at Assisi conference ICCF22.


Parkhomov LENR Theory, rough English translation reading and discussion

"A mistaken application of the so called "Lorenz gauge" in Maxwell's equations denies the status of real physical entity to a scalar fIeld that, although not directly observable, has a gradient in spacetime with clear physical meaning: the microscopic fourcurrent density field"
The above considerations are similar to one of the main point of Reed paper:
"As can be clearly seen, application of the Lorenz gauge, where C = 0, totally denies the status of real
physical entity to the scalar field. However, it is this new idea of the independence of the potentials in
this gaugefree electrodynamics out of which the scalar value C is derived, and from which the unique
properties and dynamics of the scalarlongitudinal electrodynamic wave arises."


In the model the electron is a torus shaped current generated by a spherical shaped charge.
The fine structure constant is the ratio of the two torus radii.

Here below some of the key points presented in the book:
1) Does exist a a scalar field that is the four divergence of the four electromagnetic potential
2) Charge density is the partial time derivative of the scalar field
3) Current density vector components are the partial space derivatives of the scalar field
4) D’Alembert equation can be applied to both scalar field and charge density
5) Electron mass is the angular frequency of a rotating elementary charge along a circumference which length is equal to Compton wavelength
6) Electron charge follows an elicoidal motion that can be encoded with a single spinor of Cl(3,1).
7)The concept of relativistic mass is easily derived from the electron charge helicoidal motion.
8 ) The electron charge is distributed on the surface of a sphere that follows a circular or helicoidal motion.
9)The value of the elementary charge is equal (in natural units) to the square root of the radius of this sphere with the radius of the charge orbit
10) The electron spin 1/2 is the quantized component along an external magnetic field of electron angular momentum (=hbar)
11) The elementary charge e is always associate to a quantized magnetic flux phi=h/e
12) The electron charge has a pure electromagnetic momentum eA equal to its mass in natural units
13) Newton law F=ma can be easily explained inside the theory framework
14) The charge moves at speed of light
15) Heisenberg uncertainty principle has a simple geometric interpretation
16) Ultradense hydrogen (and consequently AHE and LENR experiments) may be explained with the formations of pseudoneutrons where the proton is at center of electron Zitterbewegung charge orbit
17) The electron model suggests a pure electromagneticgeometric interpretationof Proca, KleinGordon, Dirac and AharonovBohm equations

It's possible to compare your SO(4) theory to the Cl_{3,1} approach proposed in the book "MaxwellDirac Theory and Occam's Razor"?
Mass and spin in the book are a direct consequence of the Zitterbewegung current generated by an elementary charge that rotates at light speed, coupled to a magnetic flux phi=h/e. Inertia and relativistic mass are strictly related to the charge momentum p=eA.
Before trying to understand SM, are we sure that we have well understood some very basic elementary concepts as mass, charge, spin, inertia? Have we a realistic, intuitive electron model ?

this extract from D. Reed paper well illustrate one of the conceptual foundations of the book:
"Consequently, we propose the second directive –confluent with the first – to make the potentials
completely independent of one another, resulting in a unique purely “gaugefree” electrodynamics. This
novel prescription also closely follows the principle of Occam’s razor, which dictates that a system of
scientific knowledge should not introduce concepts or entities that are not strictly necessary,
emphasizing the simplicity and conciseness of the model. Consequently, a wholesale reinterpretation
of Maxwell’s equations is proposed without gauged potentials. Also, according to Occam’s razor, this
reformulation must also of necessity, invoke the constraint that the electromagnetic 4potential, as per
the Minkowski spacetime prescription, should be considered as an inseparable single unit entity. "

"The reason for the current SM failure state, from the math point of view, is the missing correct mapping of physical facts to the basic logic of connecting the math. "
Can you illustrate, using intuitive concepts, the main points of your electron model ? Is it in agreement with Mills theory ?

blondes know even more ...
Clifford algebra is definitely the best mathematical tool in theoretical physics

In the book, in par 1.4.4, is proposed an unusual connection of a scalar field with the Feynman's concept of "unworldliness":
1.4.4. The scalar field and the Feynman concept of unworldliness
...
"Consequently in this approach the scalar field can be interpreted as a useful function, with a zero average value, that “measures” a local
“violation” of the Lorenz gauge".
...
Scalar physics has been the subject of a recent publication on Journal of Physics (Conference Series):
"However, these facts have understandably, albeit unfortunately, lulled contemporary physics into
the false security of the perceived notion that the theoretical structure of modern classical
electrodynamics is now written in stone and there is no compelling reason, empirical or theoretical, for
considering the possible need for its reevaluation or alteration."
see also:
Generalized Maxwell equations and charge conservation censorship (Modern Physics Letters B).

A possible observation of Pd and/or Ni Isotopic shift would be of primary importance to understand the physic behind Mizuno reactor.

...
In fact Rossi recently referred to a paper he introduced at Researchgate.net with quite some references to the works of Holmlid.
Having no or hardly any radiation during these phenomena may be another hint towards that direction.
Understand me well, I am not a big Rossi fan either, but the 'Rossi story' may be more complex than we all suspect.
Seems that nobody has noted that the most cited author in Rossi's paper is David Hestenes (emeritus professor of Arizona University).
It would be interesting to know his opinion on "LENR"/"UDH" researches.


From:
Adm. Thomas Wilson Document Leaks Revealing UFO Special Access Project
"INFORMATION: Even if this post is already inside the offtopic area of the LENRForum, after a long discussion, the LENR Forum team decided not to allow topics that are even more controversial than LENR  cold fusion and have the potential to damage the reputation of the forum and its members. Therefore, in the future, we will not allow topics such as UFOs, parapsychology, miraculous healings, dowsing, Bovis units, etc. and therefore block and delete these posts. We thank you for your understanding and support."

This kind of thread is an optimal choice for lowering the credibility of this forum!
