Posts by axil

What lesson did me356 learn from his experiences here at LF and the Rossi saga? Take all the knowledge that this site and MFMP can provide then go dark and hope that the memory of your existence fades as time passes.

MFMP!

MFMP is not anonymous. All MFMP experiments are streamed on the internet from beginning to end and all data acquisition is recorded and shown in real time. Any viewer can extract that data from globally accessible files and process that data in any way that the viewer sees fit.

One of the goals of MFMP is to excite interest in LENR, increase experimentation, and aid in the startup of commercial LENR activity. If completely open and fully documented experimentation does not inspire trust, than something is wrong or there may be a campaign of AstroTurfing that is beginning to be applied against MFMP to besmirch there spotless reputation together with the open source LENR movement in general.

Quote from Wyttenbach

H* is the toroidal state of hydrogen that also correspond to Holmlid's spin matter. This mechanism has ample prove as Lipinskis published the spectra with the matching energies.

So the university accepted theory of LENR is based on Holmlid's spin matter?

Quote

Title:
HYDROGEN-LITHIUM FUSION DEVICE

United States Patent Application 20160118144Kind Code:
A1

Abstract:
The Hydrogen-Lithium Fusion Device (HLFD) includes a plasma generator that generates proton-lithium plasma within a reaction chamber. The plasma generator includes a proton source and lithium source. In one implementation, bias voltage is applied within the reaction chamber. The bias voltage enables protons to fuse with lithium ions in the proton-lithium plasma, whereby energetic helium ion fusion byproducts are produced. Multiple configurations of reaction chambers containing protons and lithium ions under conditions that yield proton-lithium fusion are disclosed.

I just got dust binned for proposing how LENR in a plasma might function. It was said among other things that LENR in a plasma is not comparable with LENR theory.

OK then...explain how this works in terms of "existing LENR theory"...anyone?

Brillouin Energy Corp. uses a proprietary electrical “Q” pulse applied to the system to stimulate the specially designed core to yield LENR Heat, The Q pulse is designed to impart a large instantaneous power pulse to the SURFACE of the LENR active reaction surface. This pulse is so fast, that the surface is not heated by the power and yet the surface feels the power for a long enough time to initiate the LENR reaction.

By contrast, in a FUELED system like the one that Russ is testing, the LENR active material is contained inside the fuel pellets. The electric field must penetrate into and throughout the pellets to pump the LENR active agents.

This is why I recommend that the fuel pellet be vaporized into a plasma state to expose the LENR active agent floating in a plasma. This agent can withstand this vaporization process and remain active. Know that ultra dense material (hydrogen) is inherently indestructible.

As an eample, the QX reactor uses a high power electric arc to first vaporize the fuel. Then it uses RF to stimulate light production in and around the LENR active agent that then pumps the LENR active agent using light at the closest and most proximate position possible since the ultra dense material is suspended inside the light emitting plasma. Since this LENR reaction is subcritical, when the stimulation cycle ends in about 8 seconds, the high powered electric arc vaporizes the condensing vapor into the plasma state again. This vaporization process ensures that the maximum amount of LENR active agent is exposed to light pumping at the nearest and most proximate exposure position that is possible.

The vapor state is the optimum method to insure the most direct and proximate pumping of the fuel.

Quote from mmckubre

Axil this is not a sensible question or concern. I have chaired or co-chaired 3 of these ICCF’s. We are an enthusiastic group. At every ICCF I have had someone come up and say “my work just must be presented”. As someone already noted to do this would be a discourtesy to someone else – equally enthusiastic – who has submitted an abstract. It is also an added burden on the organizers. In terms of “the high respect that is being universally afforded to Bob and his open source organization” respect for Bob and the MFMP has not risen to the point that normal conference rules would or should be broken. I know of only ½ dozen people interested in the field who have attained this level of respect (all but the last dead): Martin Fleischmann; John Bockris; Julian Schwinger; Giuliano Preparata, Edward Teller; Brian Josephson. We would also (probably but entirely at the Chair's discretion) allow a big money funder to talk without submission or a big wheel in government. Bob belongs to none of these groups but was treated well and sympathetically. If he has a specific complaint about events of which I am unaware, he should take it up with Nagel or Katinsky, or with Bill Collis (appointed Chairman of ICCF22).

A post ftom Bob

The observations and their interpretations that Bob Greenyer will make on his analysis of the inner workings of a number of open source LENR systems are antithetical to anything that you can beleive. Yes, I doubt that you will accept it. I know that Bob has the courage to buck main stream thought and I know that the price that he will pay will be high.

My only interest is pursuing truth and I know that Bob is only interested in that too. With this upcoming highly sensitive situation close at hand, I am super sensitive to any gate keeping and ridicule that might prejudiced the Truth as I see it. That being said, I regret any overreaction that I might have made.

Jed Rothwell: the gatejeeper

Don't you remember, here is a reminder...

Jed Rothwell	1/22/12
to vortex-l

I would like to quote the founding policies of this discussion group, written by Bill Beaty:

http://www.amasci.com/weird/wvort.html

"NO SNEERING. Ridicule, derision, scoffing, and ad-hominem is banned. "Pathological Skepticism" is banned (see the link.) The tone here should be one of legitimate disagreement and respectful debate.

Vortex-L is a big nasty nest of 'true believers' (hopefully having some tendency to avoid self-deception,) and skeptics may as well leave in disgust. But if your mind is open and you wish to test "crazy" claims rather than ridiculing them or explaining them away, hop on board!"

See also:

http://amasci.com/weird/vmore.html

Many people who have shown up here lately seem to be unaware of these rules, or they are unwilling to abide by them.
They have been carrying out vendettas, writing insults, using off-color language, and calling other people here bad names. They do act according to academic decorum, which calls for a large measure of polite hypocrisy. Some degree of "ridicule, derision, scoffing, and ad-hominem" is inevitable. It is human nature. But there has been far too much lately.

These people include Mary Yugo, Axil Axil, John Milstone, Eff Wivakeef and others. You know who you are. If you will not stop this childish nonsense, I ask you to shut up and go away. I ask Bill Beaty to ban you. I have been adding you to my personal kill file, but there seems to be so many of you lately, and you are so noisy, you are interfering with scientific discourse, and perverting the spirit of this forum.

The Internet is unbounded. You can form your own discussion group. You can subscribe to this group while you post your attacks and ad hominem elsewhere. Or take it to VortexB-L. Of course we welcome your contributions to the technical discussion here.

=============================================================================

Daniel Rocha	1/22/12
to vortex-l

Axil Axil believes in Rossi. He just opened a thread about him, with ideas on how the powder was chosen.Please, pay attention.

=========================================================================================

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Shaun Taylor wrote:

Quote

Oh so now Vortex is only a PRO Rossi discussion group?

Yes. Exactly.

Now you're getting it.

What part of BIG NASTY NEST OF 'TRUE BELIEVERS' didn't you understand?

You apparently haven't read the forum rules.

Is there ANY reason I shouldn't ban you and several other obvious and flagrant Skeptics for repeated violation of #2? As stated, you should have left in disgust long ago.

Vortex-L is a "believers" forum, a tilted playing field, always has been,

and avowed skeptics are only tolerated.

To all users: Is your mind open? No? Then unsubscribe immediately, you should not be here. If you do not, I'll be going through the list and banning many users.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vtx thoughtcriminals. "Scoffing" and anti-fringe behavior, but didn't leave in disgust as suggested. Ungood! Time for Periodic Cleansing.



removed:



"Mary" "Yugo"

effwivakeef

Dusty Bradshaw

Shaun Taylor



Vortex traffic temporarily suspended. Getting everyone's attention.



I'll leave "subscribe" turned off for weeks/months, "unsubscribe" remains active. Email me directly for problems, suggestions.

Quote from JedRothwell

Rossi told me this is LENR. If it were real, it would resemble Ni-H cold fusion claims such as Piantelli's.

But anyway, why are you of all people saying this? As far as I know you believe Rossi. You are a supporter. As I recall, you are such a fanatical supporter, you refuse to read Rossi's own Penon report, I suppose because you cannot face facts and see your hero Rossi as he really is.

Theranos may be more sinister. Or idiotic. The price tag was higher. But if Rossi derailed cold fusion, the outcome would be infinitely more harmful than a few billionaires being bilked out of $9 billion. He almost derailed it, but perhaps it will survive now.

Don't you remember that you almost got me banned from Vortex because of my criticism of Rossi? I if wasn't for some friendly support, I would be out of LENR.

I cannot understand what this obsession with Rossi is all about. I don't remember him even saying that his reactors were LENR reactors. Rossi does not know what LENR is. There are bigger and more sinister con men out there to obsess about. Theranos, a blood-testing startup that's been valued at $9 billion is an example of a more sinister con.

Could it be that if Rossi was not constantly criticized, then there would be nothing to talk about. Just let Rossi fade into history. Find something interesting to occupy the forum.

Do you constantly have disturbing uncontrollable thoughts? Do you feel the urge to repeat the same behaviors or rituals over and over and over and over and over ? ... Your doctor may refer you to a mental health specialist. Enough is enough.

See post

Center Vortex Flux Tube Interference.

I had a problem posting with translation set so I moved the post elsewhere.

Quote

" If there is a possibility to use the LENRs, you can be sure that life has found it " ... it's clear. There are so many aspects to investigate and clarify in this regard.

Vladimir Vysotskii shows that growing microbiological cultures are able to proceed to the nuclear synthesis of an element that would be missing in the nutrient medium, or to the synthesis of a chemical analogue. For example, Cesium is transmuted into Barium in the absence of Potassium, but less because of its valence than its ionic radius, because it seems that it is rather in this sense that Ba2 + is analogous to K +. Other Vysotskii experiments go in this direction, such as the synthesis of missing iron from sodium and phosphorus.

But another aspect is to consider it seems to me. Lynn Margulis ("The Bacterial World") has the idea that the bacterial world acts in a coordinated way, as if it were a single being, and that this bacterial superorganism has changed and adapted the composition of the Earth's surface according to its own needs. It mentions in particular the rate of oxygen in the air which has been produced and is regulated to the right proportion which allows the oxygenated respiration without being an oxidizing threat, since the oxygen is very reactive and aggressive. This right rate of oxygen is the result of the bacterial action (the oxygen catastrophe, the cyanobacteria). This bacterial coordination, this idea of a unique superorganism, conscious even because it

This to say that the entire planet (surface, atmosphere + crust) has been reworked and adapted to the needs of life by life itself, this is what suggests the book "continuous creation" by Wilfred Branfield , which joins the thought of Vladimir Vernadski, author of the biosphere concept.

For example, to join Kervran's work, one wonders whether the calcium of the earth's crust has not been purely and simply generated by the action of microorganisms since the earliest times, so that living beings can to build hulls, then skeletons. It must therefore be considered that transmutations could also take place in a very stealthy manner, since the accumulation of such processes over geological time ultimately leads to a profound reworking of the surface chemical compositions. On the one hand, it is possible to have transmutations that are easy to highlight, while in other cases they are almost infinitesimal, and thus embedded in the whole of the chemical processes in operation,

Display More

We have recently seen in the LION reactor meltdown that we have been looking at that many individual active LENR agents (AA) produce the same identical transmutation product which includes the specific isotope. This suggests that there is communication between each individual AA so that they can act as a single macro entity. These AA may be quantum mechanically entangled.

Additionally, the same coordinated transmutation process has been seen in the latest Dr Alexander Parkhomov Data from his last experiment. In that experiment, a nickel foil has been transmuted to include gallium 69 exclusively. Also in the Lugano test, nickel 62 and lithium 6 were generated to high levels of purity.

The same quantum mechanically entanglement process might allow a colony of microorganisms to share LENR derived energy between them and also produce LENR reactions by tapping into a common energy pool that they all contribute to. The microorganisms may therefore act as a macro scaled sized agent whose energy potential both protects each individual from high levels of nuclear energy release through super-absorption and also to amplify their collective power to generate a potent LENR reaction through super-radiance on a global colony wide scale.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superradiance

There is no consciousness or intelligence at work here. The entanglement is an inherent characteristic of the LENR reaction mechanism.

Quote from Alan Smith

If you are suggesting I replicate Holmlid's work, there was a time I considered doing so. However, the big 'but' is I that I believe it took Sindre Zeiner-Gundersen 3 years to make a successful replication of this, presumably with Homlid's involvement. Reading your post above suggests that it would just be a case of buying a laser and pointing it at the fuel. Unfortunately, not so, anymore than dunking some Pd in D20 would guarantee a successful replication of F&P's pioneering work.

I beleive that all LENR fuel is based on the generation of ultra dense material. If a fuel shows LENR activity, then it includes in one way or another an Ultra dense component. I beleive that Russ's fuel contains ultra dense material since it is LENR active.

Now the experiment can take advantage of the processes that Holmlid uses to activate the ultra dense material. It is that simple.

I also beleive that the energy that is output from the fuel is proportional to the energy input (Or Pumped) into the fuel until you get to the takeoff point. At that point the system becomes super-critical and melts down.

The one cool feature that diamond affords in the analysis of the minors behavior is that we can see what the minors have done when totally enclosed in a solid material. Diamond's transparency opens a window into what the minors have done. It is like looking into a termite colony to study their life cycle.

It was generally accepted by those who undertook the study of the LENR reaction that the LENR reaction confined itself to the surface of a metal. In this particular circumstance. Surface Plasmon Polaritons are acting in their native state. In this state, the SPPs form in bumps and pits on the surface of the metal. But the minors open up a new ballgame. They are now symbiants that exist on the backs of ultra dense material that forms inside the lattice structure of a non metal. But hydrogen becomes a metal when it is compressed enough by the chemical bonds of the host material. In the symbiant state, the minors work below the surface of the material. This wide variability in the LENR life-cycle makes LENR hard to understand.

Quote from Shane D.

Axil,

What is up with you tonight? Appears to me you are going off the deep end, ranting and raving with little meaning. Jed, MMcKubre, and now DW, have tried to explain that BG was not treated disrespectfully in their opinion.

If BG disagrees, he is more than welcome to reply here. He has an open invitation to LF, and we would love to have him become a regular. A little tougher place than ECW, but that is actually good for LENR.

Some advice from The Godfather: Santino, never let anyone outside the family know what you are thinking.

Quote from Dewey Weaver

Greenyer got plenty of air time at ICCF21. Some of his questions were good and some made him look & sound foolish. He ran his presentations every afternoon

of the poster sessions and even on the remaining mountain top bus while the rangers were searching for the missing David French. The Parkomov 1700C transmutation video / claims are interesting but the record remains - nothing has ever worked in his lab when outside visitors are in attendance. We'll see if that changes.

Frank Gordon, formerly of NRL, filled the only open slot that I was aware of while Ruby got a promo snippet moment as well. Greenyer is a smart gent but his O'day fundraising antics have severely impaired his credibility with the field. He did get his own MFMP video moment at the end of Forsley's presentation on Friday. The debate is still on as to whether that was a visionary at work moment or a comedic slice of the jugular. One thing is for sure after this conference - Rossi is a forgotten speck in the rear view mirror of time .

I'm curious. whose jugular is being sliced, and if it is being sliced, why is it being sliced?

Quote from Shane D.

I have much respect for BG, and I do not see him delaying O-Day due to any "crap storm". He is as tough as they come, and combined with a very creative mind, he, and MFMP will be big contributors to the field going forward.

If O-day never arrives, it will because the pieces do not fit. Hopefully, in that case he will fess up.

If what you state is in fact the case, way weren't the rules of the conference suspended as a courtesy in light of the high respect that is being universally afforded to Bob and his open source organization?

Quote from Rends

Do you think that a discussion at this level can make any meaningful contribution to advancing LENR on a public or academic level?

The great virtue of this forum is that we are all permitted to speak openly and freely without the fear of recrimination. The freedom of speech is the greatest freedom of all.

Quote from Zeus46

We might have finally gotten to hear what 'O-day' is all about.

I have a felling that O-day is indefinably postponed due to the crap storm that will certainly ensue. Such is the consequence engendered by the disrespect for differing opinions. Sometimes, the better part of valor is to keep your thoughts to yourself.

Quote from Shane D.

...a test that was a failure.

Failure makes all the difference.