Just published -
JOURNAL OF CONDENSED MATTER NUCLEAR SCIENCE - VOLUME 15, March 2015
Just published -
JOURNAL OF CONDENSED MATTER NUCLEAR SCIENCE - VOLUME 15, March 2015
McKubre/SRI confirm that "Energetics" superwave works
QuoteSRI has shown over hundreds of electrochemical experiments that the Fleischmann–Pons heat effect can be generated if high current, high loading and deuterium flux are present. Until the work of Dardik and the Energetics group, we were unable to generate the deuterium flux synthetically. Using Dardik’s Superwave® method to generate deuterium flux, we have shown that excess heat is regularly seen in PdDx electrolysis cells, given the appropr
Swartz ans hagelstein confirm the efficiency of applying pulsed magnetic field.
This work seems used by some work by Violante, and remind me the old work of Dennis letts.
QuoteAmplification and Restoration of Energy Gain Using Fractionated Magnetic Fields on ZrO2–PdD Nanostructured Components Amplification and Restoration of Energy Gain Using Fractionated
Lattice Assisted Nuclear Reactions (LANR) (CF) activated nanocomposite ZrO2–PdNiD CF/LANR components are capable of significant energy gain over long periods of time with reproducibility and controllability. We report the response of such active components to steady and dynamic applied magnetic field intensities up to ∼1.5 T changing with a 0.1 ms rise time. Power gain was determined by the triple verified system of dT/Pin, HF/Pin, and calorimetry. Fractionated magnetic fields have a significant, unique amplification effect. Residual, late-appearing effects are complex. Importantly, at higher input electrical currents, high intensity fractionated magnetic fields demonstrate their own, new optimal operating point (OOP) manifold curve. This suggests that cold fusion (LANR) is the first stage, and may be mediated by other than phonons.
The article "Revisiting the Early BARC Tritium Results" is interesting to see the great work of Indian scientists in early time.
There is the Celani wire replication by Umbald Mastromatteo (STMicroelectronics).
many other interesting articles of courses...
Alain,
Just my speculation, not an assertion -
The superwave is a repetitive superposition of sine waves of different frequencies, having a
spectrum similar to a swept-frequency "chirp", but with (I believe) recurring periodic
"superoscillatory" regions, where the signal oscillates much faster than its fast component.
These would not occur in chirps, and very rarely in commonly occurring wideband noise.
If the waveform is truncated by passing thru a slit (or, in the case of a particle wave function
localized while superoscillating by a collision with a different already localized particle), it
acquires a momentum greater than any component (see [1].) No violation of momentum
conservation, nor the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, since both are satisfied by averaging.
For the superwave, random noise in the system could enhance or reduce the effect.
This could be rejected as a mathematical idealization, but it appears that
superoscillations do really generate energy foci, or "hot spots" - see [2].
[1] "Unusual Properties of Superoscillating Particles"
Section 'SELF-ACCELERATION THROUGH SINGLE SLIT' on p.2
http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0305148v1.pdf
[2] "Abrupt Rabi oscillations in a superoscillating electric field"
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1409/1409.5644.pdf
Perhaps, also interesting -
[3] "Yield–Optimized Superoscillations"
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1209.6572v3.pdf
I don't know. On first vision for me is producing very rich harmonic,( but simple square wave is already very rich... maybe superwave contain more frequencies and not only a frequency comb as usual).
It seems clear to me that the NAE have some sensibility to electric field, magnetic field...
as few experiments by Dennis Letts, Violante, and others shows there are various RF domain (THz, GHz, MHz)...
I fell scientist are approaching the mystery... Still in the dark, but soon they will find the switch.
Only experiments will validate one (or more) theories, for sure.
The state of these systems can only, with luck, be approximated by mathematics.
It is interesting to note, though, that wide band signals, with either continuous
or picket fence spectra will rarely exhibit superoscillations. However, the
'superwave' (where the superposed sinusoids are appropriately phase-locked) could
exhibit them in a regular periodic fashion. This is a time-domain phenomenon that
cannot be seen only by examining the spectrum. A periodic square wave has a wide
spectrum, but does not have superoscillations.
More speculation - The application of multiple laser beams of differing wavelengths
has reportedly initiated anomalous reactions. Possibly, (especially if any nonlinear
optical effects occur) some (quasi-) superoscillations occur.
However, the mere "pumping" of a system of particles of differing masses might
create "hot spots" via the Fermi-Ulam effect. See, for example -
"Fast Fermi Acceleration and Entropy Growth" - http://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.04691v1.pdf
you are right, the difference between simple shapes and superwaves is mostly in phase relation between the harmonics.
Jean-paul Biberian just published the latest volume 16 of JCMNS.
It is mostly dedicated to J Bockris
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedo.pdf
JCMNS volumes are availeble on LENR-CANR.org, with individuar article listed.
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1495
Here is the table of content:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedo.pdf
Display MorePreface
I met John Bockris only once, in 2003, during the ICCF 10 conference in Boston. Georges Lonchampt with whom I worked for several years told me about the major role that John Bockris had played in the field of electrochemistry, so that I knew how important he was both for electrochemistry as well as for cold fusion. I still have in my memory the image of him sitting in the conference room. In 2004, I organized ICCF11 in Marseilles, France, my home town, John Bockris did not come, but nevertheless, I published in the proceedings a very important paper on transmutations that he wrote. In December 2010, I received a nice e-mail from him ending with:
"I have known your work quite well for many years and wanted to show you my appreciation of it. With good wishes to you and congratulations. Keep it up!!"
I felt very honored to receive such praise from this great scientist, even though we had only briefly met in person. In the years that followed, as I was the editor -in- chief of this journal, we had many e-mail exchanges because at that time, Bockris wrote quite a few papers on cold fusion and submitted them to the journal. He was always very nice with me, even though sometimes we had hard times with the referees. I am very happy that this special volume dedicated to this great man will pay a tribute to him, both as a man and a scientist who took the risk of losing his credibility by involving himself in themes as unorthodox as transmutation and cold fusion.
Sincerely,
Jean-Paul Biberian
(Editor -in-Chief )
May 2015