Light and Electricity ‘Not Impossible’ with E-Cat X

Could this be related with the "current anomalies" observed by Celani et al.?
https://drive.google.com/file/…kED9WWjZISEZrYXE3ZE0/view

Leif Holmlid also observed muon production. Muons decay to electrons and this can be taken advantage of for direct electricity production.
A related press release from the University of Gothenburg hinted this as well: http://science.gu.se/english/News/News_detail/?languageId=100001&contentId=1323710&disableRedirect=true&returnUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fscience.gu.se%2Faktuellt%2Fnyheter%2FNyheter%2BDetalj%2F%2Fsmaskalig-karnfusion-kan-bli-ny-energikalla.cid1323710

Quote from Ecco

Could this be related with the "current anomalies" observed by Celani et al.?
https://drive.google.com/file/…kED9WWjZISEZrYXE3ZE0/view

Leif Holmlid also observed muon production. Muons decay to electrons and this can be taken advantage of for direct electricity production.
A related press release from the University of Gothenburg hinted this as well: http://science.gu.se/english/News/News_detail/?languageId=100001&contentId=1323710&disableRedirect=true&returnUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fscience.gu.se%2Faktuellt%2Fnyheter%2FNyheter%2BDetalj%2F%2Fsmaskalig-karnfusion-kan-bli-ny-energikalla.cid1323710

http://physics.princeton.edu/~…rubakov_rpp_51_189_88.pdf
Monopole catalysis of proton decay

Because Holmlid is seeing mesons, this a strong indicator that an Exotic Neutral Particle is producing a monopole field to disrupt protons.

@axil: how would that explain muon production in Holmlid's case? Are you suggesting he's not actually seeing muons?
Disclaimer: I know pretty much nothing about subatomic physics.

Quote from Ecco

@axil: how would that explain muon production in Holmlid's case? Are you suggesting he's not actually seeing muons?
Disclaimer: I know pretty much nothing about subatomic physics.

There is a branch of physics that is currently looking for the monopole. Many physicists have devoted their professional lives to this search. This concept is required to complete many theories in physics.

One thing that the monopole searchers are looking for is the decay of the proton that the monopole would produce. This decay would result in the disruption of the nucleus and the production of mesons.

If Holmlid is seeing mesons, it is almost certain that a powerful monopole magnetic field is disrupting protons and causes nuclear chaos. The monopole field is not coming from a fundamental particle(dirac monopole), but one that is built as a quasiparticle('t Hooft–Polyakov monopoles). The Surface Plasmon Polariton(SPP) can produce a monopole magnetic field. This quasiparticle is a nanosized ball of light(ball lightning) that can produce a monopole magnetic field. The Rydberg matter that Holmlid is generating could be the right shape to produce the SPP. It could be a magnetic monopoles formated EMF cloak that covers the Rydberg matter.

In fuel preperation, Holmlid takes a few weeks of shining his laser onto the Rydberg matter before that stuff become active. This may be causing a charge of SPP monopole magnetic energy to cover the Rydberg hydrogen matter.

@axil: thanks for the explanation, although I simply meant that if I look up the definition of muon (which Holmlid observed in addition to pions and kaons, both mesons) on Wikipedia even I can see it's currently classified as a lepton (although it once used to be called "mu meson" before the 1970s) and I was curious to learn how that would fit your explanation of monopoles being generated in the process and disrupting protons (but what about deuterons?) into mesons.

It's been reported once that Holmlid suggested that replications of his experiment should be preferably ran for weeks if nothing apparently arises at first, but I'm not sure this is what he usually does as I've never read about this in his papers. It's not even clear if this is accurate, as it was third hand information. Gotta ask Sveinn Ólafsson @sveinol in his thread.

Quote from Ecco

@axil: thanks for the explanation, although I simply meant that if I look up the definition of muon (which Holmlid observed in addition to pions and kaons, both mesons) on Wikipedia even I can see it's currently classified as a lepton (although it once used to be called "mu meson" before the 1970s) and I was curious to learn how that would fit your explanation of monopoles being generated in the process and disrupting protons (but what about deuterons?) into mesons.

It's been reported once that Holmlid suggested that replications of his experiment should be preferably ran for weeks if nothing apparently arises at first, but I'm not sure this is what he usually does as I've never read about this in his papers. It's not even clear if this is accurate, as it was third hand information. Gotta ask Sveinn Ólafsson @sveinol in his thread.

It is not certain exactly what type of meson that Holmlid is producing. The mesons that CERN produces are high energy types that have a very short lifetime. Holmlid could be producing this type to start out the meson decay chain with. Holmlid may not see these high energy mesons because they don't live very long(10^^-23 seconds).

This type of high energy mesons decay into the K-mesons. Holmlid says that he is producing this type because he has detected their decay time signature. They become visible after 10^^-11 seconds. These Kaons, decay into pions). These pions then decay into muons after short time. Then finally, the muons decay into electrons.

With all these mesons flying around, the deuterium would take a nuclear beating. A very wide variety of nuclear reactions could be occurring.

Here is another theory that tachyons will produce glueballs. Holmlid may be producing tachyons because of the high energy of the mesons that he is seeing. Tachyons, micro black holes, and monopoles are all the same thing that differ only in the level of energy that they store.

There is experimental evidence from other LENR experiments that monopoles and tachyons are being produced in LENR.

See
http://restframe.com/rf/home.html