QuoteBut following your logic it was all Rossi who gave him the instructions right?
The first "independent" report we have access to from Penon was published by Rossi (you can find it on ECW). There were two versions, both problematic. However Rossi now says, in reply to criticism of its lamentable technical errors, that it was not actually done by Penon (perhaps I've got this wrong - I don't fully understand Rossi's argument - anyway he claims Penon is not responsible for it).
That does not help matters. If Penon can allow his name to be put against one report from Rossi which is essentially a fabrication, and certainly technically incompetent, he cannot be trusted to make a fair technical judgement over this one year test.
It is not necessary to get into the matter of how the Penon report inaccuracy happened in the past. The fact is enough.