Quote from Shane
Are you saying Rossi was adamant about the 1 year test, because he felt doing it that way would satisfy IH's need for proof, while also advancing the tech towards commercialization? "Kill two birds with one stone" as they say.
If so, that sounds pretty reasonable on his part to me. One could even argue he was passing up a quick, easy $89 million pay out, for the heroic purpose of getting his Ecat to market.
I think you'd need to explain this. The long-term test, as implemented by Rossi, appears to have no relevance to e-cat commercialisation.