http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmancalorimetra.pdf
Jed, i'm a bit surprised you pick this paper?
The results here consist of two claims:
(1) Claims of excess heat at lower temperatures which are not so compelling: but if you consider they are we will look at them in detail. My math is I think up to it.
(2) Vague claims of excess heat during a runaway event with no detail where there are many unconsidered issues and the results are clearly unsafe.
It is not really a paper describing new results, more a paper discussing calorimetric methods. Which is fine, but not what is called for here.
It has been discussed a bit here before. Do really consider this what justifies your very strong claim above - that all the scientists not convinced by this work are biassed, stupid, or ignorant? If so I'd be happy to look at it again.