Please stay on topic!
This thread is about the ERV report.
Please stay on topic!
This thread is about the ERV report.
For a short moment I was shocked
@LENR4you: Schön dich hier in unserem Kreise zu haben
Kannst du uns vielleicht schonmal einen kurzen Ausblick geben, über was der Vortrag von dir gehen wird? Nur über den Motor, oder auch einen kurzen Abriss über die aktuelle Situation?
Eventuell ist bis dahin [lexicon]Industrial Heat[/lexicon] an die Öffentlichkeit heran getreten, und man kann offizielle Informationen nochmal den Zuhörern aufbereiten
Naja an Patenten würde ich mich jetzt nich aufhängen.
Patentieren kann man ja nahezu alles
Dennoch ist die Ablehnung in DE deutlich stärker als in anderen Ländern. Zumindest habe ich so das Gefühl.
Hier herrscht sehr viel Arroganz und Hochnäsigkeit, wodurch jede Argumentation oder Diskussion bereits im Keim erstickt wird.
@Epimetheus: Ja in Deutschland wird LENR fast ausschließlich von bekannten Esoterik- und Verschwörungswebsites thematisiert.
Leider dann meistens auch mit dem für Betrugsmaschen typischen Esoterik- und Verschwörungsrumgeeiere anstatt mit wissenschaftlichen Fakten zu punkten.
Und die wenigen wissenschaftlichen Fakten die dann (wenn überhaupt) kommen, sind völlig falsch und fern der Realität wiedergegeben.
Wenn in Deutschland jemand mit einem IQ über Zimmertemperatur nach dem Thema (in deutscher Sprache) sucht, wird er wohl schon nach 5 Minuten Recherche das Fazit "Betrug und Geldmacherei" ziehen.
Leider war es in Deutschland bisher auch immer so, dass wenn auf irgend einer Konferenz ein Vortrag dazu gehalten wurde, dieser meistens auch ausschließlich von bekannten "Esoterik-Großmeistern" oder dubiosen Geschäftsleuten (z.B. Adolf Schneider) mit null wissenschaftlichem Grundwissen gehalten werden.
Da ist sowas wie Seriösität von Beginn an nicht vorhanden.
@H-G Branzell: It is more important to which company/organization this guy is employed.
Is it a well known and state trusted certification organization (like german "TÜV", don't know what's equivalent in the US), or is it a small unknown company? The latter would be a hard punch in our faces...
I just hope that [lexicon]IH[/lexicon], with their business experience and professionalism, made a wise choice and took an organization which is serious and without any doubts (for their own safety as well).
Nice to hear that. But why not publish it immediately?
But also good to hear that Rossi wants to publish it.
@bocijn: I guess this is why [lexicon]Industrial Heat[/lexicon] plans to produce the ecat in a factory in china.
So they can flood this great market with very short delivery times.
Maybe also of interest our LENR Trend chart:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/CustomPage/?id=1
Nothing new so far.
I guess they didn't see anything interesting
@Paradigmnoia: Brian Ahern already clearly stated his opinion about Rossi and Lugano here and here in the forum.
Short: He's sure it was completely faked and waste of time to try to replicate this reactor.
They also seem to work in a very low temperature range (~400°C), compared to Rossi and others (> 1000°C).
Maybe this is the reason for the small excess?
Very small excess heat?
[...]and you can be sure if they had specifics they would be more definitely upbeat. Words cost nothing[...]
I guess you underestimate the heavy economic and business impact such an announcement could have!
You are a scientist, and from that POV it's necessary to publish any results.
But from the business POV there are several reasons to hold positive results back for a while.
Simply to make internal tactical preparations, as long as no one cares about you...
Perhaps good news for everyone who wants to attend the New Energy World Symposium hosted by Mats Lewan:
Today Andrea Rossi was asked whether the press conference he will held in june is connected to Mats Lewan's Symposium, and he said "yes":
QuoteDisplay MoreJanne | 4 hours ago
Dear Andrea,
1. Is your planned June press conference connected in any way to Mats
Lewan’s New Energy World Symposium, which will also take place in
Stockholm that month?
2. At that conference, will both the site and the identity of the customer be revealed?
3. If 2 is a “yes” to both, will the customer be present and speaking at the conference?
4. Will mainstream media be invited?
5. Would you say there are still plans to commercialize the one-year 1 MW plant design?
Best Regards,
Janne
QuoteDisplay MoreAndrea Rossi | An hour ago
Janne:
1- yes
2- I do not know
3- I do not know
4- we’ll see
5- if the results from the ERV will be positive, yes, but we still do not know
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update:
Ok, I can now confirm that Rossi will attend the New Energy World Symposium, not as a speaker but interviewed by me on stage.
In connection to the symposium, at a separate event, he says he will have some important announcements to make. No date defined.
The decision to hold the symposium, however, still depends on the result of the one-year 1MW test being released and positive.
Plans are proceeding meanwhile and there are now more than 200 attendees pre-registered. I'm also considering making it a two-day event, June 21-23, with an option to attend one day only.
We will look forward with higher expectations to this event and, if so, congratulation to @Mats Lewan
For more informations about the Symposium visit the Website: http://new-symposium.org/
For pre-registration (currently sold out!) visit: http://new-symposium.eventzill…/event?eventid=2138840997
@AlainCo: Are you sure that [lexicon]IH[/lexicon]L Holdings Limited is the same or related to [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] Holdings International Limited?
Okay, mostly copy & paste.
@emtee: Not yet. I think we have to wait for an update by MFMP
@Ilir Mehmetaj: Das weiß bisher keiner so genau.
Laut Rossi lief zeitgleich zum 350 Tage Test der 1 MW Anlage eine Sicherheitszertifizierung.
Eventuell wird derzeit auch noch eine Analyse des verbrauchten Reaktorbrennstoffs durchgeführt, um sicher zu gehen, dass bei der Reaktion keine radioaktiven Elemente entstanden sind.
Letzteres könnte auch ein Grund sein, warum der Bericht auf sich warten lässt.