Let's be serious, it is high time for disambiguation!
I dare to think that the discussion here about the visit at the Doral plant is anachronic and inefficient.
The RvD trial seems to be planned for a duration of 1.5 years , 9 months in 2016 and 9 months in 2017
and now it is in an advanced state- that is the Court already knows the real proofs of the Parts- it is a game of chess.
In meantime, here in this parallel garbled trial -we are still playing poker more disinformation, incomplete information, irrelevant"information" is processed than real information. Less and less connected to the real evolution.
Rossi has given some information about the Plant during the Test - as any real plant there were problems and the problems were solved, the technology works, giving multiplicative excess heat. Results are in four ERV reports accepted and paid by IH.
After April 5, 2016 when the litigation started, IH and its supporters have gradually created a counter-narrative- the process is inexistent, impossible and (if not so) kills everybody in the customers plant
Technically (actually anti-technically speaking)
the main proof of IH is the famous Exhibit 5.
My opinion is that this Exhibits says false and inept things. A decision could be taken based on a diagram of the plant or even better now based on what was seen during the visit of the Plant.
Then the great fan of Exhibit 5 could say loudly and proudly: I have told it, the steam pipe has only 40mm, the flowmeter was in a half-full pipe over the reservoir: "veni, vidi, vici!" Murray is a genius and so am I (he)
Instead such message even in a diplomatic form, here Dewey has placed a lot of sentences - ambiguous, irrelevant and venomous.
Here there are, commented;
The story is
interesting in that it continues to evolve over what was there and photographed
on inspection day vs what Planet Rossi
thinks / wishes was there during the "customer" rental period
including pipe sizes (and since for that matter).
Clearly blurred the story evolved during the Test
nd what's with the the pipe sizes?
Lots of explaining left
for the Plaintiff's side.
Fine for its opponent, nothing more to explain?
One moral of the story
has become clear - teach your children that you can tell the truth the same way
every time but can never tell a lie the same way twice.
At a first sight it looks he speaks about Murray, perhaps he has told the same lie before the Court. But was he there?
Planet
Rossi knows who was there and who was not and there was no court reporter for
the site inspection.
Planet Rossi, Dewey's stereotipy is all Rossi's supporters. They have no idea who has been at the visit. Rossi probably knows
R's been getting a lot
of English practice in all the depositions - its amazing how connected that man
is to his story.
This is indeed a nasty trick was Rossi unable to tell something important? Has actually somebody reported that Rossi was not speaking well.
Dewey, I offer you a challenge- let's take ten pages from James Joyce's novel 'Ullysses' and
let's list the words we do not understand. Who finds more is the loser, OK?
Remember
that Rossi has no expertise in real steam systems.
Other nastyness- perhaps he is good in surreal steam systems?
Your experts will help him after finishing their reports.
It would be better to discuss as professionals or not at all. No more void ambiguities!
peter
