Posts by ogfusionist

Happy to see that you will be continuing with your experiment. Please continue posting on this forum, I'll be following up on your progress. Best of luck!

&"Yes i don't think LENR bomb, as we know for fission bombs, will exist."

Didn't we test hydrogen bombs and also stockpile hydrogen bombs? These are hydrogen fusion triggered by U235/239 fission reactions. It seems that the definition of LENR now extends out to this region of transmutation.

Maybe you believe that we've evolved in these few years to where use of super bombs is unimaginable? No, there's a power mentality in control that bombs would be the first priority. The belief that LENR cannot be adapted for massive explosions is childish. We'll find a way. I've had a minor explosion in a fusion reactor and there have been reports of laboratory destruction from hydrogen fusion experiments.

&"I expect some good experimenter will tighten the bolts on his experiment, or will help others replicators."

Alain, "Cold fusion" is the first bolt to tighten. That is the use of "cold" associated with hydrogen fusion. Who in hell associated "cold" with this reaction. Must have been some journalist working over the first press release.
Probably used in a relative context but time to change. Whoever uses this term associated with his experimental data is off to a bad start in credibility. Accepting inaccuracy is not good as a start.
It's embarrassing to continue using this misnomer.

I'm retired and don't have the equipment necessary to run these experiments.

I'm satisfied believing that transmutation did occur when the earth was formed and also occurring now in he molten core. The conditions are not favorable for this to be happening in the earth's crust now. If we define "cold fusion" as a low amu transformation process, it did happen in the past but is not happening now.

You mentioned: "I'm 60 years old and I have no memory of the language of English.", well I'm 90 years old and have no memory. Would be great to be young again and following up on this experiment.

&"Peter Graneau will most adamantly say, "Absolutely NOT!!!!" and become very angry that someone might even think of making a connection between his work and cold fusion. Peter is a serious, serious skeptic."

Then he would qualify as a pathoskeptic,
Absolutely NOT!!!" would never be used by a scientist. Not fair putting these words in his mouth when he's not here to defend himself. Wonder if his opinion has changed? Too bad he can't communicate.

None of this blabbing puts our next meal on the table, unless you're one of the very few cashing in on free forum meeting meals. Now that we understand that the sun fuses hydrogen to produce energy lets get back to burning wood for heat. Less dangerous pollution and our planet would last a little longer. I have a Franklin stove that's great for heating and cooking my bread and beans.

Back on subject, I have a working metal oxide reactor that fuses hydrogen, although the Franklin stove is much simpler for preparing meals. This fusion reaction should be a candidate for a Nobel prize although its not on an unequal par with fire. Fire is dwarfed by this reaction. It can quickly fuse silica free alumina.

The posts on this LENR forum have wandered far off subject. Probably because nothing new has been done on the basic hydrogen fusion reaction. The term was proposed to relate to initiation of proton fusion. Although the reactor is not difficult to replicate, talk is much easier but also must wander off subject, hence the blah that wastes the forum's purpose.

Restriction to posts relative to hydrogen would result in a forum with no post though.

I don't understand the Russian language so I'm not in a good arguing position. Wish I did because there is excellent work being done there and a lot is missing in translation.

Before retirement most of my work was with gas chromatography. Our sense of smell far surpassed detection limit for those instruments, but correct identification was too biased. Based on referential material in our brain misinterpretation was far too easy.

Your sample of carbonate rock containing crude oil may have produced lower organic fractions by the energy introduced by the electrical discharge. Even if your identification was correct, proof that gasoline was initially in the sample isn't there. Try vacuum distillation of the sample without any electrical discharge, if the smell of gasoline is in the distillate then you may be on to something important.

&"Oil obtained from the electricity in the earth's crust in subduction zones"
If you propose that this is ongoing this is off subject related to the argument relative to LENR. Hydrogen fusion in this reaction requires no electrical discharge, its simply direct proton fusion. The hypotheses proposed are enough of a problem without going of on other tangents. Crude oil is already trapped in the earth's crust and the helium associated with the deposits adds proof that LENR was involved when produced. It's all there is, none is being made now. Electron conductivity in the crust won't allow charge concentration.

&"Hydrogen and helium are constantly formed in the earth's crust in subduction zones."

You are bad at chemistry! The helium is a product of hydrogen transmutation. Hydrogen would have to be in the crust to transmute to helium. It can't appear from nowhere and certainly is not at the quantity necessary for what you speculate.

"Cold fusion" is a ridiculous term, believe me it's hot and "ball lightning" is an old wives' tale. Lightning involves electrons and a ball of electrons in the earth's crust is a ridiculous concept. Impossible!!!

&"Read the plate tectonics and mobilism"

Are you sure you read your copy of "plate tectonics and mobilism" correctly? If this statement "there is formed the oil, water and gas by electricity, which produces cold fusion, a plasma type of ball lightning" is in your copy it's a quack book.

Because of the reactor experiment in my laboratory that initiated hydrogen fusion I do have a theory. The reaction started at the dissociation temperature of hydrogen on a metal oxide lattice reactor and produced helium. I measured no radioactivity with a GMC and the metal oxide showed no change in oxidation state. This was not the classical fission or fusion reaction. I like to refer to it as a nanoscale reaction. This indicates a lattice spacing at the ~0.1 nanometer or atomic dimension. It's as if the proton interaction on the oxide lattice nulls out the Coulomb repulsive force.

&"According to the late Ken Shoulders"

Yes, Ken Shoulders had interesting ideas about electron clusters. I remember some discussions at dinnertime after an afternoon of flying gyrocopters.

When light is emitted from these experiments it would be interesting to use a spectrum analyzer for wavelength analysis. Helium would indicate that hydrogen nanoscale fusion has occurred.

Alain, LENR has taken on a number meanings, do you use it as related to the basic proton to helium reaction? The acronym then signifies nanoscale fusion.

The higher amu transmutation gammas are not simpler and safer and approach fission hazards.

&"cold fusion in the bowels of the earth"

My study of geology doesn't help, I'm more confused than ever.

By popular definition LENR is nanoscale fusion. At the low amu level this process is transmutation of hydrogen to helium. Certainly not ""cold" fusion"" as misnamed. Our sun is a working example of this stellar reaction. It's impossible that this form of fusion is going on in the bowels of the earth. The core is molten as shown by our magnetic field and some form of transmutation occurs, but not LENR as defined above. The dissociated hydrogen would have permeated and left the earth's core long ago. Sorry, LENR doesn't fit on this bandwagon.

I believe your model does predict the future. The scaremongers will be controlled by necessity.

What beautiful gifts for us to use! First fire and now nanoscale fusion. Seems there is some intelligence in the design.

&"There are cylindrical concretion like sausage chopped"

Shape is the result of the molten globules solidifying when the magma cooled.

From Wikipedia: "Besides molten rock, magma may also contain suspended crystals, dissolved gas and sometimes gas bubbles."

There is no fireball underground. If you are trying to relate the concretion shape to LENR it's not probable. The requirements for hydrogen quantity can't be met in the molten magma. The LENR or nanoscale fusion concept works for stellar processes not in condensed matter.

Shape indicates that the material was globular when in the molten state and solidified to form the geospheres. Same shape as oil droplets suspended in water and if the oil would be frozen in liquid nitrogen the droplets would appear to be geospheres. Exactly what I'd expect when the earth transitioned from molten to solid state.

Nice pictures, thank you.

I studied geology in school and am aware of earth formation concepts.

Sorry, locate a physicist for the definition of LENR. The term shouldn't be bandied for publicity.re of the earth formation concepts.

Gennadiy, I should have mentioned in my previous post: Thank you! for the attached photos. Very nice.

No, your big mistake. Photographs of earth from satellites shows one big sphere. Concretions formed when the melted mass of the earth cooled to form the planet. Simple as 1,2,3......
No need to try to hammer LENR into the picture. It's intelligent design pure and simple. All designed to keep us entertained as we wander thru an infinity of time. I see you are entertained by studying Geospheres. Great subject, should keep you entertained for awhile. I'm entertained by the proton to helium low amu transmutation reaction.