Before the practical predictions it would be interesting to know if the basics of the theory make sense.
Evans presents "definitive proofs" at this page:
http://aias.us/index.php?goto=showPageByTitle&pageTitle=Definitive_Mathematical_Proofs_of_ECE_Theory
Dear physicists !
I would like you to tell your opinion of one of the (maybe so much hated) unified theories, ECE (Einstein - Cartan - Evans ) by Myron Evans.
I'm asking this because i'm not familiar at all with the mathematics that is used to prove this theory (tensors etc.). Why this theory attracts me is the addition of torsion in space-time geometry.
Here's a general slide-presentation of the ideas:
http://www.aias.us/documents/m…aneous/ECE-popular-en.pdf
And this is more complete description of the theory:
http://www.aias.us/Books/PECE.pdf
So does this theory have anything to do with reality or is it pure non-sense ?
Try a Tensor Coil or caduceus coil.
So you mean something related to these:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/sclxmtr.htm
http://www.aias.us/documents/m…aneous/PotentialWaves.pdf
And what do expect to be the benefit of this device ?
@Tom Paulson Your FFT graph of a simulated SCR spectrum is nice to look at, but rather deceptive. The log scale obscures the reality that the harmonic at 1 MHz is ~110 dB (3 X 10^-6) below the fundamental. I'm not saying that a chopped waveform doesn't have higher harmonics. However, only those below around 100 kHz have significant ) amplitude.
In addition, the self-inductance of a typical heater coil acts as a low-pass filter. I measured a corner frequency of 50 kHz for my Glowstick coils. Higher-frequency stimulus thus requires a different mechanism, perhaps rods passing through the reactor end seals. This feature is part of the GS6 design now under development.
There have been several speculations which frequencies could be useful for stimulation, varying from X kHz to Y THz. One (not so safe) idea came to mind. Why not try e.g. the 2.45 GHz found in almost every kitchen inside a micro-wave oven ? No idea if this frequency is better or worse than any other proposition. Electronic hackers could also tune the magnetron circuit to some other frequency if needed. The benefit of the oven is that the transmitter power is quite high, typically more than 500 W.
And now part III is available:
http://etiam.fi/files/Report_part3.pdf
As an engineer, not a physicist, my contribution to this forum might be quite small. Still i have every now and then some (stupid) questions that i would like to ask.
One of these questions is about electrolysis-based LENR. I have read e.g. at Peter Gluck's blog that this direction is a dead-end.
But if we think about something that an amateur can easily achieve without a lot of money to be spend on, maybe this is one option:
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/cfr/html/cfr30.htm
To me the description of test system is very clear and the documentation of the results is also good.
If we add here the latest ideas about magnetic monopoles by "axil" what could be the result in that case ?
If i understood correctly this would mean some kind of steel cover around the glass container to keep those inside the bottle.
Any comments ?
