"Determining the three-body and higher-body interactions among nucleons and hyperons directly from QCD will be a remarkable achievement for Lattice QCD, and will provide crucial input into th ecalculations of the structure and interactions of light nuclei.
During the last year the first calculations of three- and four- nucleon systems were reported.
Such calculations are presently difficult, but are primarily limited by the available computational resources and not by conceptual or formal issues.
It is anticipated that the three-nucleon interactions will be calculated with high-precision with Lattice QCD during the next decade.
Beyond the three-body systems, we expect that some of the properties and
interactions of light nuclei will be calculable with Lattice QCD during the same time-period.
The dream of being able to perform reliable calculations of the interactions among multiple nucleons and hyperons, and of the structure and reactions of light-nuclei, directly from QCD is starting to be realized. The path forward is clear,
and the next decade will be a truly remarkable period for nuclear physics"
I answer him by posting these 7 videos - I made 7 videos as a guide for physics students who are going to work in the field of nuclear physics and particle physics.
The misconceptions of Nikitin and his colleagues from JINR, Dubna, have been sorted out… -
Search for a new charged particle in the mass range 2–100 MeV, Nikitin V.A. , June 7, 2023 part 1 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Search for a new charged particle in the mass range 2–100 MeV, Nikitin V.A. , June 7, 2023 part 2 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Search for a new charged particle in the mass range 2–100 MeV, Nikitin V.A. , June 7, 2023 part 3 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Search for a new charged particle in the mass range 2–100 MeV, Nikitin V.A. , June 7, 2023 part 4 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Search for a new charged particle in the mass range 2–100 MeV, Nikitin V.A. , June 7, 2023 part 5 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Search for a new charged particle in the mass range 2–100 MeV, Nikitin V.A. , June 7, 2023 part 6 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Search for a new charged particle in the mass range 2–100 MeV, Nikitin V.A. , June 7, 2023 part 7 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
At the request of the creator of the "Global Wave" Starukhin Yaroslav for schoolchildren, students, engineers and scientists, I recorded a lecture in 10 parts, in which I presented the development of ideas from the time of Charles Coulomb to the present day.
From Charles Coulomb to Cherepanov Alexei Ivanovich. Maxwell's mistakes. Part 1, June 8, 2023 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
From Charles Coulomb to Cherepanov Alexei Ivanovich. Maxwell's mistakes. Part 2, June 8, 2023 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
From Charles Coulomb to Cherepanov Alexei Ivanovich. Maxwell's mistakes. Part 3, June 8, 2023 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
From Charles Coulomb to Cherepanov Alexei Ivanovich. Maxwell's mistakes. Part 4, June 8, 2023 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
From Charles Coulomb to Cherepanov Alexei Ivanovich. Maxwell's mistakes. Part 5, June 8, 2023 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
From Charles Coulomb to Cherepanov Alexei Ivanovich. Maxwell's mistakes. Part 6, June 8, 2023 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
From Charles Coulomb to Cherepanov Alexei Ivanovich. Maxwell's mistakes. Part 7, June 8, 2023 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
From Charles Coulomb to Cherepanov Alexei Ivanovich. Maxwell's mistakes. Part 8, June 8, 2023 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
From Charles Coulomb to Cherepanov Alexei Ivanovich. Maxwell's mistakes. Part 9, June 8, 2023 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
From Charles Coulomb to Cherepanov Alexei Ivanovich. Maxwell's mistakes. Part 10, June 8, 2023 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
The permanent magnet will produce a vortex, whereas an electromagnet will not produce a vortex. The spin of the electrons in a permanent magnet carry angular momentum, whereas the electrons in the current of an electromagnet are random and the angular momentum is not organized and therefore not effective in vortex formation.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Why is this observation of vortex formation important in science?
In a Bose condensate, a number of vortexes will form. These vortexes will indicate the nature of the polariton structures that form within the condensate. This shows that the spins of the polaritons are magnetically organized and stationary as in a permanent magnet. There is no rotation or current of the spin carrying particles involved in a Bose condensate as witnessed in the formation of vortexes in the condensate. Within the condensate, there are multiple vortexes of both polarities. This vortex formation pattern indicates that these stationary spin structures form multiple stationary regions within the condensate.
The link to the bubble vortex formation at the end of the video.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Electric current is the movement of the ethereal mass, which is "moved" by electrons - clusters of electrons. The movement of this mass is imeen and makes the magnet + screw rotate ... Where does the mass come from? Mass from a battery - this mass is stored by "mass-charged" clusters of bound electrons.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Believe it or not, special relativity produces magnetism in electromagnetism.
Such videos are a fairy tale for gullible children, and such videos have nothing to do with real physics - this is pure fantasy, which is not confirmed by anything ... This is not real physics, but "drawing physics".
EM and PM are different manifestations of the same force caused by the alignment of the orbital and intrinsic magnetic moments of the bound electrons of a ferromagnetic material (to take a simpler case)
Ordinarily, electrons in a material are arranged such that their magnetic moments cancel out. But sometimes—either spontaneously, or owing to an applied external magnetic field such as that produced by a current flowing in a nearby coil—the electron magnetic moments will tend to align. When this happens the bulk material produces a net total magnetic field.
Alan! Thanks for the answer ! But ... I would have accepted your answer 7 years ago as quite plausible, but today I cannot accept this, because. electrons have no orbital motion and, accordingly, there is no orbital magnetic moment of an electron in nature ... It follows from this that there is no "alignment of the orbital and intrinsic magnetic moment of bound electrons" in nature ... This is the first ... Second - for some reason you don’t explain the REASON for generating different strengths for permanent magnets of different power ...
On the other hand, I can understand you - modern physics poorly imagines the physics of both permanent magnets and electromagnets, since modern physics is erroneous and these errors in physics began with Maxwell's erroneous theory ...
By measurement. It was about 20 years ago, so the details are hazy but the experiment is simple. Put a solenoid coil around one end of a steel bar -say a meter long. Energise the coil to create a short powerful pulse. At the other end of the bar you have a sensor- another coil. When the far end of the steel bar becomes magnetised the coil detects the flux and creates a current pulse. Both input pulse and output are measured using an oscilloscope. I cannot remember the lag figure, but it was clear and unambiguous.
Let's understand each other... You write about "electromagnet"... I wrote about permanent magnets... And that's what interests me - I'm interested in how this different FORCE is generated?
I am not sure how relevant this is, but the speed of magnetic flux in metals is very finite.
And you can find out - how did you come to this conclusion ... The power of permanent magnets is different ... If so, does this mean that the "magnetic fluxes" are different there? I'm not interested in energy - I'm interested in how this different FORCE is generated?
The energy here is low < 50ev or so, but obviously enough to push electrons or ions from the lattice.
Dear TNN! I am obliged to correct you ... Moreover, I am obliged to inform you that you are not able to explain to me and the entire physical community - what kind of FORCE "pushes out electrons or ions" ... This happens for a very trivial reason - you are mistaken and do not understand that the very depth into which, because of his mistakes, Maxwell plunged you... Physics, which allegedly explains that electrons and ions are pushed out, is absolutely not true... Think about this problem... The old physics is wrong.
Curbina - it is true - if you think the only point in dialog is to persuade people of LENR right or wrong - then I am an unsatisfactory interlocutor, not easily swayed.
But it would be really boing here if that was the content. It is all the details that are interesting of specific experiments, what they do or don't show, how they are analysed. I learn stuff from people here, or sometimes am challenged to research stuff for myself, much of the time, and it keeps me interested even without the elusive breakthrough that would significantly alter my personal dial for LENR likelihood.
TNN! You are an interesting conversationalist! Please read my article and give me your answer - is it true that hydro wave technology exists... ? For example, is it true that radioactive strontium-90 was reformatted by an alpha particle into zirconium-94?
Personally, it is unpleasant for me to read what is stated in this thread ... My teacher Kanarev F.M. In 2000, he presented a model of the proton in the form of a torus. That was 23 years ago... Thousands of foreign experts know him. The Japanese published articles together with him. He gave his lectures in Switzerland....
It is known that the rest mass of the proton is equal to the Electric charge of the proton is positive and equal to the negative charge of the electron. The magnetic moment of the proton is The electromagnetic structure of the proton is unknown. If we assume that it (like the electron) has the shape of a torus, then the radius of this torus will be the following ... "
00:42:23 Alexey Cherepanov: There is no amplitude of the electric field, since there is no electric field in nature
00:48:44 Valentin Shironosov: Regarding ponderomotive forces and moments of forces, slide 26, acting on particles with magnetic moments, the situation will have two solutions, out of resonance (Nonlinear Parametric Resonance) and in resonance - NPR, in the book - https:/ /ikar.udm.ru/files/pdf/sb82-1-7.pdf page 65 and force calculations, see https://ikar.udm.ru/files/pdf/sb67-9.pdf, and follows expect powerful nonlinear resonant effects in the "SR" (PNR) region in the often UV 234 nm and 292 nm - https://ikar.udm.ru/sb/sb38-3.htm (Fig. 1), with ortho- and para-orientation of "dark hydrogen", "possibly" useful video see from 0:54-2:00
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
, changing frequency, changing direction force action in the direction of the beam or against it, a typical task with "atomic traps"🤝
00:57:00 Alexey Cherepanov: An excellent experiment. What do I foresee? It is with similar experiments that it will be possible to prove my hypothesis - "electric current" and "light wave" is the transfer of "photon mass", which characterizes the temperature - the larger this mass, the greater the temperature ... But should there be a carrier? I believe that electrons do this... The discharge brings "photon mass" from the "electrical network" into this system. But both here and there have their own magnetic system and the curves show the interaction of these magnetic systems.
01:01:21 Alexey Cherepanov: Here. Here. An increase in conductivity is essentially an increase in the magnetic potential of electrons, i.e. their ability to pump a large "photon mass".
01:05:55 Alexey Cherepanov: They did the right thing - they measured the current ... See what I wrote above.
01:06:38 Alexey Cherepanov: Zatelepin is the movement of some substance... I imagine this movement as the movement of an "ethereal mass" - this is the same as a "photon mass".
01:07:47 Valentin Shironosov: A previously unknown path for converting heat into electricity has been discovered in the USA -
01:10:11 Alexey Cherepanov: Zatelepin - when switching to variable mode, there is nothing there ... Great! This is what proves from my point of view that I am right - "electric current" is the movement of a photon mass. Thanks to the experimenters... But... But it's interesting that I came to THIS without such experiments, but only thanks to the physical chemistry of the microworld...
01:14:10 Aleksey Cherepanov: Clusters of electrons and magnetons in the air - Zatelepin correctly noted - oxygen plays a major role there, has magnetic properties, and electrons and magnetons "stand" in the discharge. The following experiments helped me understand all this - Tests in a vacuum chamber - https://drive.google.com/file/…nRVKEM98/view?usp=sharing
01:21:26 Alexey Cherepanov: A mercury thermometer, unlike a thermocouple, is a mass accumulator. This is where the effect manifests itself ... I just don’t understand why there is a small effect in 1cm ... But. But it is clear that some role of the magnetic system ...
01:23:06 Eugeny EGOROV, Vladivostok: There is current in ANY material, since there are ALWAYS electrons in the CONDUCTION BAND!
01:23:45 Paul Weisman: Nothing is said about the biological effect of T.V., although it was stated in the list of its properties?
01:28:36 Alexey Cherepanov: Savinkov did well again! The discharge creates a magnetic field - above I presented the experiments. And there - where there is light, and where there is a discharge, clusters of electrons - that's why there is a magnetic interaction.
01:29:16 Paul Weisman: Milliamp currents are a lot!
01:30:44 Alexey Cherepanov: Zatelepin is mistaken about energy!!! It is necessary to talk about MASS! About photon mass!
01:38:10 Alexey Cherepanov: It's strange for me to listen to Zatelepin - we are creating new chemistry... 15 years ago Kanarev called THAT what Zatelepin calls "dark hydrogen", orthohydrogen.
01:42:16 Paul Weisman: A clamp meter, even an accurate one, is a crude instrument. There would be another method, more precisely ...
02:09:03 Arayik Danghyan: Quantum mechanical calculation of dark hydrogen
02:10:07 Alexey Cherepanov: 6th edition of "Fundamentals of Physical Chemistry of the Microworld" Kanarev F.M. pp.121-122, fig.79
02:11:48 Alexey Cherepanov: Klimov about a sieve and a metal box. Bravo! A very important point for understanding what I am trying to convey to everyone - electron clusters penetrate everywhere! and Carry mass everywhere!
02:16:58 Alexey Cherepanov: Thank you Anatoly Ivanovich! Interpretation is the most important - it is almost 70-80% of the effort. But Zatelepin is satisfied with the old physics, and I believe that it interferes with the correct understanding, since in the old physics there are such concepts as "electric fields", "electric charges", "electric forces" ACCORDING TO MAXWELL, but none of this exists in nature. Maxwell was grossly mistaken!
02:17:36 Eugeny EGOROV, Vladivostok: It is NOT-POSSIBLE to separate the EXPERIMENTAL REPRESENTATIONS (Internal Theory) and EXPERIMENTAL WORKS due to the deepest connection of these mutually complementary processes !!!
02:19:19 Alexey Cherepanov: In the footsteps of L.I. Urutskoev’s report about the Chernobyl accident May 10, 2023, May 18, 2023 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/RRN5/a4WLTPDo3
02:26:12 Alexey Cherepanov: Chistolinov - this does not fit into physics at all ... Since I also studied extrasensory perception, did gravitational gymnastics with the great psychic - Anatoly Ivanovich Samodumov, I received knowledge that, on the contrary, allows me to say today - ALL THIS physics and this physics of a photon wave! "Once again about the photon wave....doc" - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/xFow/ognAtcvVF
02:28:47 Alexey Cherepanov: Zatelepin - Chitolinov doesn't read a book... And Zatelepin himself? And Zatelepin himself does not read my articles ... This somehow characterizes him strangely ... At the same time ... At the same time, as an experimenter, I like him
02:32:02 Alexey Cherepanov: The discharge is over... And the reaction is going on - Zatelepin... That's right... And it will go on... Since electrons are the keepers of the attached photon mass... So they "discharge" this mass in time ...
02:33:59 Eugeny EGOROV, Vladivostok: Spin interaction is a special case of the Hyperbolic Analogue of the Electromagnetic Field Dm. PAVLOVA!!!
02:40:11 Alexey Cherepanov: An interesting remark by Ivanov M.Ya. The fact is that for 2 years now I have been representing magnetic field lines as strings - clusters of electrons and magnetons. It is they who carry the photon mass.
02:48:00 Alexey Cherepanov: Wow! Shishkin's experiment is very interesting to me. At this pace, we will come to an unequivocal conclusion - it is necessary to revive hydrowave technology.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
In the footsteps of the video "Falsifications in Science and the End of the History of Mankind", 09/10/2023, Part 2 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
In the footsteps of the video "Falsifications in Science and the End of Human History", 09/10/2023, Part 3 -
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
And you think we should watch videos. Videos are for entertainment, not serious science.
It's strange for me to hear all this from the person who asked me on November 30, 2022 to explain the physics of the Hall sensor - The church of SM physics =53 - "So show us. You never actually show us anything new arising from your theory or views. I still want to know how you explain the 'Hall Effect', which has proven so important is studying semiconductor properties." You wrote this... I presented you with the opportunity to see exactly how the Hall sensor is used in experiments. What can you offer in return - a more modern and more efficient device? If you are not able to understand this video as "a kind of science", then why are you visiting this forum?
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.More DetailsClose
