f that's the case, this imaginary surface would need to have an extreme high density wouldn't it?
Not necessarily, the reaction duration factor also affects here.
bayak
Verified User
- Member since Oct 13th 2021
- Last Activity:
Posts by bayak
-
-
It's difficult to understand why specifically double (or multilayer) plasmas would be required.
A double layer is needed in order for the gas ions to form on an imaginary surface. In this case, it is easier for the nuclei to overcome the Coulomb barrier.
-
they really take us for idiots
It's not so easy to understand who thinks who is an idiot. But it seems that there is a paradoxical situation when older people are interested and work in LENR, and young people are interested and work exclusively in the mainstream thermonuclear sector.
-
As ever, we wait to see.
Someone is waiting to see, and someone is waiting to participate in an idea contest. For me, you should start with ideas, not money.
-
So what are the results of the last workshop? Did it take place in the format of a brainstorming session or in the format of a discussion club?
Of course, it would be naive to expect it to make fateful decisions for LENR, but at least there should be some benefit from this meeting.
-
My biggest fear is not that the science isn't real but that the project will be infiltrated or dragged out for decades like Brilliant Light Power.
And are you not afraid to invest in a pure idea (without installation)? Specifically, offer your developers the idea of a vortex plasma reactor and then you won't have to wait long for a positive effect.
-
If this workshop had found low-energy nuclear fusion reactions right in the sun, then it would have made a revolution in the energy sector.
-
I think they are trying to cram too many people into their "lightning rounds." Maybe too much thunder, not enough light.
Whoever shouts louder will win. They don't have enough money to support everyone, and they don't have enough brains to choose the most promising direction.
-
Perhaps study up on Lysenko "genetics" before urging a Stalinist management style as the solution to any problem.
In the case of LENR, the role of Lysenko is played by those who hide behind the Coulomb barrier.
-
Where you got vortex plasma installation from?
This is a cross between a bulldog and a rhino. There are also a wind tunnel and a thermonuclear reactor and a plasma propulsion device. But if you think that this is not the original device, then just say so.
-
Cool, maybe this arrangement is related to this abandoned mystery.
Vortex plasma installation is a figment of my imagination, and here is an experiment.
-
Chernetski also utilized alternate fields
Where to read?
-
go directly after replication of Lipinski experiments
Where to read?
-
A double layer of plasma forms in an alternating electric field, where the plasma is divided (polarized) into a layer of electrons and nuclei
-
Let's try together to calculate the acceleration of compression of a liquid bubble (cavitation, Sonoluminescence), which is sufficient to overcome the Coulomb barrier.
-
Except that it's way easier to achieve displacement of electron orbitals (which would shield the atom nuclei) than displacement of atom nuclei itself.
In my example, we are talking about plasma, which is why the nuclei in the double layer of plasma are displaced
-
Thank you for your support and let me also remind you of the Usherenko effect (1974, Minsk).
-
The impression I get is that the main criticism from the “scientific mainstream” is the problem of the Coulomb barrier. From what I have read it is not felt in the LENR community that a full on paradigm shift in nuclear theory is required but perhaps a reformulation or loophole might provide the answer. Again this seems to me to be more credible.
It is very likely that this is so. At least, when I turned to the Department of Physical and Technical Sciences (Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Belarus) with my project, the main criticism boiled down to the question of the impossibility of overcoming the Coulomb barrier.
-
I agree that every theory should be confirmed by experiment. However, in this case we are not talking about a new theory, so let's bet on testing the proposed model. In this regard, look at the final paragraph from the note presented here 'In conclusion, we recognize that our theoretical conclusions require more detailed mathematical modeling and experimental verification. On the other hand, it should also be recognized that the presented mathematical calculations are quite sufficient to initiate R $\&$ D. We also draw your attention to the fact that the analysis of the operation of the vortex plasma engine device is based on classical physical concepts, but taking into account a new view of the mechanism of collective interaction of nuclei in the reaction of the so-called cold nuclear fusion.'
-
Alan Smith, I agree, but an experiment without a theory is unreliable, you have to hope for luck. I have just been given a link to a talk where the author (Pankaj Jain) relies on the duration of the interaction (based on the time-dependent perturbation theory). A good move, but do not forget about the impact force in LENR.
