Display MoreAxil,
You just can’t be serious, you just can’t.
You’re a smart guy,
What do you think it means!
Energy Out > Energy In
There is clear evidence that the E Cat is energy gainful. IH gave Rossi 10.5 million for the Rossi IP. Unless IH is managed by complete morons, the test that proved overunity must have actually showed overunity energy production and by a wide margin at least 10.5 million worth.
Display MoreAxil,
The same thing I wanted proved since January, 2011.
Energy Out > Energy In
Proved, by multiple sources,
not “Rossi says“
Not Rossi sock puppets
Not Rossi fake customers
Not you or Adrian or any other person who has no clue if it works or not.
What does works or not mean?
Display MoreAxil,
The same thing I wanted proved since January, 2011.
Energy Out > Energy In
Proved, by multiple sources,
not “Rossi says“
Not Rossi sock puppets
Not Rossi fake customers
Not you or Adrian or any other person who has no clue if it works or not.
Rossi notwithstanding, there are many other LENR experimenters that have achieved a number of differing levels of accomplished LENR results. Why cannot those other LENR efforts provide the proof that you need to see that can provide this still yet to be specified need for proof?
Display MoreGE LM6000 PC 40MW 50Hz Gas package complete, 1998
Ask Siemens for a smaller package (ca. 10MW), buy 4 of them.
If Boeing is the customer/partner, then this is the unit that will be replaced.
PHOTO: Tamara Linton (left) of Boeing Site
Services and Paul Libbey of CB Richard Ellis
discuss the energy and cost saved by a new
equipment monitoring system at the Boeing
site in Chicago. Bob ferguson/Boeing
We have not yet had any provable positive news - perhaps you mean "the first provable news"?
What exactly do you need to be proved?
Oh man, now this is getting complicated! Last week it was only going to be heat he was selling. Now heat/electricity, and with the Ecat mated to a turbine. Wow.
His admitting now the customer is his partner, may be an important revelation. If the partner is legitimate, this is looking more like a R/D. That would explain how he is getting away with doing this without certification.
Of course, this could all change by tomorrow.
Last week the decision about developing the SK reactor was not made. Now, the SK reactor will be developed. The SK reactor is turban capable whereas the QX is not.
Any proof why his current claims on products, customers and partners should be true? I mean other than Rossisays or Rossiwrites....
A customer cannot just take the word of a vendor that his product meets specifications. There is a testing process that must be performed where the vendor demonstrate that his product meets the customer's specification, That test is called "Demonstration and Proof of Capability"
You say what counts, are facts. Why do you then ignore the clear facts that Rossi has been proven to be a liar and con man? He himself admitted to be his own fake customer he did sell heat to...
I now beleive that when Rossi finally understood that he could not commercialize his old tech, and when IH offered to buy that tech, Rossi decided to sell it to IH. This old tech could pass a day long test, but not a year long test that was required for commercialization.
When Rossi found a way to fix the failure prone nature of his old tech, Rossi then came up with a way to get the E-cat IP rights back. His methods involved a no holds barred legal knife fight in which Rossi was not constrained by ethics.
Rossi's partner will have (maybe is now having) a very strong voice in the SK vs. QX product release decision. If Boeing is the partner, it would REQUIRE that the SK reactor is to be the first product release that Rossi makes since the SK reactor is ideal as a jet engine primary power source. If the partner is a food vendor, then that partner would opt to release the QX to the market since it is well tested and is less risky to release to the marketplace and the process heat market.
We keep debating with Adrian as if there was a point to it. The only really interesting question is whether there is any conceivable circumstance under which he would decide that Rossi has nothing of value. And I think we already know the answer.
The problem with old Rossi tech is that it was not robust and enduring. His new tech may be more robust and less fault prone since Rossi tested his new tech for a year, the advertised lifetime of the reaction zone.
Rossi has had only one real paying customer for ecats, and they were extremely unsatisfied, and they sure did pay.
Acknowledged. old Rossi tech was flawed. So is all other LENR systems that is currently following that design. Rossi's new tech may work better.
"PdD is a door-opener to a whole new kind of physics."
The ease in the production of ultra dense material may be proportional to the atomic weight of the material being compressed. Protium is the hardest to compress, then deuterium is a little easier, next is lithium. Maybe lithium 7 is easier that lithium 6 to compress. And water could be the easiest compound to compress since it is a very heavy compound atomic weight wise compared to protium. Noble gases like xenon might be very easy to compress, possibly only using a shock wave from a spark discharge.
Display MoreWyttenbach,
You have drunk deeply from the Rossi
KoolAid machine, to the point of using his favorite descriptor, “Soon”
Maybe you have the cajones to actually define “soon”.
Give me any realistic date and I will
take the over
Delivering a useful nuclear based energy production commercial product is not an easy job to do. Ask ITER. if their product is going to be available shortly...soon.
The etching of this stuff and the analysis of the results is a process that requires the development of considerable expertise to avoid artifacts. This is nothing like amateur film-processing where mistakes are obvious because we are familair with photographs and what they should look like. Yes, it can be done but it isn't easy.
The skill that the experimenter applies in using the methods that he invents will reveal what underpins the processes that are being explored. For example, Holmlid has made huge contributions in exploring his field of interests because of the particle identification methods that he has invented and the skill that Holmlid employs in using those methods.
The experimenter should always be interested in uncovering new experimental methods and even inventing new methods. Galileo made a leap in the field of astronomy when he applied the telescope in looking at the planets.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=…Vaw36oCVEtxCz00x9IzCcW3gy
Ubiquitous PET can substitute for more expensive CR-39 for monitoring particle tracks.
Each type of plastic particle detector has its own etching method and is sensitive to particles in its own sensitivity range. For example, Cr39 is the most sensitive having a very wide detection range between .1MeV and 20 MeV. On the other hand, Polycarbonate is only sensitive to particles in the range between .3 MeV and 3 MeV.
That comment from Leif Holmlid is from 2015. Since then I believe he had a stroke, and his research stopped. Has he resumed? Sveinn Olafsson of the University of Iceland worked with him, and presented at the recent ICCF21. Sveinn used to post here on LF.
https://journals.plos.org/plos…1371/journal.pone.0169895
QuoteThe time variation of the collector signals was initially assumed to be due to time-of-flight of the ejected particles from the target to the collectors. Even the relatively low particle velocity of 10–20 MeV u-1 found with this assumption [21–23] is not explainable as originating in ordinary nuclear fusion. The highest energy particles from normal D+D fusion are neutrons with 14.1 MeV and protons with 14.7 MeV [57]. The high-energy protons are only formed by the D + 3He reaction step, which is relatively unlikely and for example not observed in our laser-induced D+D fusion study in D(0) [14]. Any high-energy neutrons would not be observed in the present experiments. Thus, ordinary fusion D+D cannot give the observed particle velocities. Further, similar particle velocities are obtained also from the laser-induced processes in p(0) as seen in Figs 4, 6 and 7 etc, where no ordinary fusion process can take place. Thus, it is apparent that the particle energy observed is derived from other nuclear processes than ordinary fusion. It is clear that such laser-induced nuclear processes exist in p(0) as well as in D(0). The low laser intensity used here, of the order of 3×1012 W cm-2 makes it impossible to directly accelerate the particles (especially the neutral ones) to high energies. For example, in Refs. [58,59] more than 1019 W cm-2 was used to accelerate heavy ions to > 1 MeV u-1 energies, thus close to 107higher intensity than used here.
As of 2017, the Holmlid reaction is far to energetic to be fusion. In other words, the reaction IS NOT FUSION.
As documented from an old post, there may be a way to generate ultra dense hydrogen based LENR fuel cheaply from processing old trash as follows:
Display MoreIt is certainly interesting and it sort of appears like a legitimate operation (from a brief browse of the site) but:
1) how long is the claimed 20mW for?
2) how much energy in vs energy out?
3) how is it measured?
4) it's still just a claim-- how verified independently?
Sorry if I missed seeing the answers, it's a large site.
This sort of seems more like Mills than like Rossi.
See
https://e-catworld.com/2018/03…ring-in-safire-axil-axil/
I think that the hydrogen fusion stuff is going black
If you know how to use the wayback machine, look at this
http://www.safireproject.com/gallery.html
This info has been removed
The production of high power up to 2.000,000 watts from a input of 3900 watts.
High amperage and voltage discharge when ionized layers of hydrogen explode
Transmuted elements that appear in the hydrogen envelope: He, C, N, O, Ne, Fe, Cu, Ag.
...
..
.
yeah, of course. Some freaks with no clue about fusion under high pressure and high temperature and strong, rotating magnetic fields inside a lab can explain, how the sun works.... keep on dreaming... but be quiet.
The mission of the scientists doing the SAFIRE experiment are tasked with is exploring the reactions that drive the Sun's corona. But since they have by chance discovered this singularly unique reaction, they may be redirecting their research into commercializing it. I will continue to speak out with great vigor because IobseRvable you surely do need an education.
Rossi has done a ton of unnecessary R&D because he does not know what he is doing and he does not use close observation of experimental results to keep himself from making huge mistakes. Early on, Rossi should have understood that LENR is a highly distrutive reaction. But he still went ahead and built the Doral 1 MW plant. It fell to pieces over extended usage, and Rossi should have understood that this type of failure would surly occur. Rossi is a marginal product developer and wastes tons of money that could be saved. Any understanding of the LENR reaction would tell him that his path to a reliable produce was flawed.
