axil Verified User
  • Member since Oct 10th 2014
  • Last Activity:

Posts by axil

    As you said correctly adding! Max 12% to natural gas, not solving any energy problem. But fuel cell cars is an other story. May be excess solar/ wind energy is the more reliable source for it, than a fictional XUV source that nobody has seen yet.

    Andrea Rossi
    May 30, 2018 at 5:08 PM

    Rick57:

    We measured the peaks in the area between 100 and 200 nm, but the spectrum had lower values also through the whole visible spectrum. When you look at the spectrum of a plasma you do not see a peak perpendicular to a flat line with y=0, but a sawteeth like graph. Another reason of the white light, that is the result of all the visible lambda combined, can be the ecceleration of the electrons of the atoms around the plasma. We were, obviously, not looking where the spectrometer eye was ( too dangerous for the sight ).

    Warm Regards,

    A.R.



    And don't discount the SunCell. If R. Mills gets his act together, hydrogen will flow in short order. One of his followers should clue him in on photodissociation of water. I am wondering why such a world class chemist did not think of this solution for himself. The heat generating SunCell is a huge mistake. If Mills went with a photodissociation of water design, all his problems would be over. Using the photodissociation of water is all know technology...no heat problems...no solar cell issues...no materials issues...Hydrogen fuel cell tech is mature and commercialized, he will have been home free. I now state boldly that whoever first adopts photodissociation of water energy tech in the race to dominate future world energy production will be first to market and sell the low cost systems solution.



    SunCell spectrum


    TB-Slide64.png

    Unlike the generation of electric power from heat, the production of hydogen from LENR generated photons is 100% efficient. Using a hydrogen fuel cell is the way to convert that hydrogen into electrical power at that maximum 100% efficiency. That high efficiency is maintained if mechanical energy is produced from that electricity by using an electric motor.


    The integration of LENR power into the existing energy infrastructure can be supported by the production of natural gas. This can fit into the existing energy balance sheet seamlessly even if introducing some inefficiencies into the energy flow-sheet is the price for this seamless integration.


    Adding hydrogen into the existing natural gas infrastructure might also be possible without affecting much of what currently exists.

    I am becoming more convinced that the new Rossi reactors(QX and SK) are using transparent hexagonal boron nitride as his tube material. This material is not transparent to ultraviolet light but is transparent (85%) to visible and infrared light.


    uv-vis-transmittance.jpg


    More info on transparent hexagonal boron nitride as follows:


    medium


    I suspect that the XUV light produced by the LENR reaction is downshifted by hexagonal boron nitride into the visible frequencies. This downshifting is what is generating the huge amount of white light that the SK has been reported to be producing.


    Boron Nitride neither reflects or is transparent to XUV so BN must absorb that XUV photon energy. That absorbed energy must go somewhere. I beleive it is stored in excited electron orbitals of boron and nitrogen. So it must be released as the light frequencies defined by the various spectral emission Iines of these constituent materials. I think that most of that stored energy is released as white light as Rossi has reported. White light emissions coming from the SK is extreme. Heat energy is also released but I do not know the percentage in proportion to the other color emission lines, but heat can not be a dominant energy release mechanism.

    All this emission/absorption/ transparency stuff can be adjusted by adding dopents to the BN or whatever ceramic that Rossi is using. This is a big job to R&D an optimum solution for a tiny company like Rossi's.


    The answer to the problems that the SunCell is having is using hexagonal boron nitride to convert all that XUV that the SunCell reaction is producing into light that COTS solar cells can convert into electrical power.


    If these XUV generating systems want to harvest energy in the form of hydrogen produced from water photodissociation by XUV, they could use a ceramic that I have found that is transparent to XUV.


    https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0447390A4/en


    Transparent polycrystalline body with high ultraviolet transmittance, process for making, and applications thereof


    This material lets 85% of the XUV through.


    This material is resistant to abrasion or erosion, does not substantially deteriorate after exposure to ultraviolet light, and has high strength. The sintered body is useful in a variety of applications, including as a dome and window for missiles and launch tubes.


    The sintered body of this ceramic is resistant to degradation under high temperature conditions and, in particular, has a high melting point, preferably above 2000°C.


    High temperature heat tolerance in a plasma heat containment material is not important is a water based hydrogen photodissociation system, Such a system could use a double walled pipe filed with water in a plasma containment tube configuration. The water would serve as a circulating coolant and the hydrogen could be separated from the OH using a polymer electrolyte membrane that are commonly used in hydrogen fuel cells.


    IMO, this water cooled double walled hydrogen photodissociation system configuration is optimum for a system like the SunCell.


    Another material that is totally transparent to XUV is transparent aluminum.


    https://phys.org/news/2009-07-…rent-aluminium-state.html


    Transparent aluminium is 'new state of matter'


    "In this week’s Nature Physics an international team, led by Oxford University scientists, report that a short pulse from the FLASH laser ‘knocked out’ a core electron from every aluminium atom in a sample without disrupting the metal’s crystalline structure. This turned the aluminium nearly invisible to extreme ultraviolet radiation."

    The new high powered LENR energy systems primarily generate intense XUV light. This XUV has very high energy content. Unfortunately, these LENR systems are designed to waste this photonic energy.


    The amount of energy in these photons is given by the equation E = hf, where E is the energy of the photons in Joules; h is Planck's constant, which is always 6.63 * 10^-34 Joule seconds; and f is the frequency of the light in hertz.


    The energy content of light is therefor directly proportional to its frequency and therefore also wave length.


    A typical infrared photon has a wave length of 1200 nm whereas the XUV has a wave length of 100 nm. Since the energy content of a photon is proportional to its wave length, the XUV photon carries 12 times more energy content than does the infrared photon.


    If the XUV light is wasted, then only under 10% of the light energy is utilized in the SK reactor.


    Futhermore, we can assume that a LENR based photodissociation system will be nearly 100% Faradaic efficiency for hydrogen production, consistent with studies of polymer electroyte membrane electrolyzers,


    The use of the energy outputs of the SK reactor as well as the SunCell is most likely misapplied in the use of a turbine to only extract heat energy from the LENR reaction.. The XUV energy in these systems is wasted in preference to the utilization of heat which is only a small part of the output energy produced by the SK. Most of the output power produced in these systems comes in the form of XUV photons. The capture of this energy forms a foundation for an effective engineering solution to utilizing the energy produced by LENR.


    http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/water_spectrum_2.gif


    Absorption of UV close-by (~125 nm), excites the 3a1 orbital leading to dissociation into OH + H (photodissociation; higher energy absorption produces charged fragments). Such dissociation can also be achieved by consecutive absorption of two 266 nm photons.


    The value of the production of atomic hydogen in photodissociation is obvious.


    The value of OH as a valuable waste product as follows:


    The hydroxyl radical is often referred to as the "detergent" of the troposphere because it reacts with many pollutants, decomposing them through "cracking", often acting as the first step to their removal. It also has an important role in eliminating some greenhouse gases like methane and ozone. The rate of reaction with the hydroxyl radical often determines how long many pollutants last in the atmosphere, if they do not undergo photolysis or are rained out. For instance methane, which reacts relatively slowly with hydroxyl radical, has an average lifetime of >5 years and many CFCs have lifetimes of 50 years or more. Other pollutants, such as larger hydrocarbons, can have very short average lifetimes of less than a few hours.


    Hydroxyl is an anti-pollutant. It counteracts climate change and smog.


    In 2014, researchers reported their discovery of a "hole" or absence of hydroxyl throughout the entire depth of the troposphere across a large region of the tropical West Pacific. They suggested that this hole is permitting large quantities of ozone-degrading chemicals to reach the stratosphere, and that this may be significantly reinforcing ozone depletion in the polar regions with potential consequences for the climate of the Earth.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxyl_radical


    Absorption of two higher energy photons, at 200 nm, gives rise to a hydrated electron by H2O + hν -> H2O+ + e-aq


    In the XUV light that is produced by the SK, water absorbs most of its energy content.


    The many ways to convert high powered photon energy into useful energy output.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photodissociation


    XUV can Photodissociate water into hydrogen and electricity in the presence of various biological catalysts.


    H2O + 2 photons (light) → 2 e− + 2 H+ + A


    That is electricity and hydrogen where A are biological catalyzed chemical products.


    Since the SK produces a huge number of photons, a corresponding huge amount of electricity and hydrogen will be generated by this process.


    Furthermore, water can be dissociated into its constituent elements as follows:


    H2O -> 2H + O


    http://www.pnas.org/content/106/28/11454


    High pressure based photo-reactions combining H2O with CO to form clathrate hydrate(natural gas).


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clathrate_hydrate


    It might be possible to create a SK solution that can power an automobile as a retrofit of the IC engine using natural gas or hydrogen.


    The use of a natural gas burning turbine might also be productive.


    Feeding natural gas into the worldwide natural gas pipeline systems could be a low impact introduction of LENR energy into the world's energy usage balance sheet.


    F3.medium.gif

    axil I didn't state anything I just re phrazed your own post. So if somebody is wrong here that must be you.

    "So all your things like antimatter, virtual particles etc can be just a mathematical formula artifacts which have nothing to do with reality."


    I don't remember saying that.

    Quaternions aren't new maths - They are so old that Maxwell used them in the first place! ...Heaviside removed them, to simplify things.

    http://www.rexresearch.com/maxwell1/20equations.pdf

    Thanks for the tip. I did not know about all the work done over the last 150 years to upgrade the Maxwell equations. The Standard model must have absorbed all that theory. Anyone looking to replace all that work is in for a very big job.


    http://www.thp.uni-koeln.de/gr…tarbeiter/MaxwellUCL2.pdf

    So all your things like antimatter, virtual particles etc can be just a mathematical formula artifacts which have nothing to do with reality.

    The theory and experimental verification of both Dirac's and Richard Phillips Feynman's work disproves your statement above.

    axil as you posted elsewhere : A cornerstone of modern physics is mathematics. Like it or not, without the tools provided to physicists by mathematics, physics would be dead in the water. But (and this is something that all of us forget on occasion) solving equations is not the same as understanding the physics. A critical step in the development of physical insight is to recognize which solutions to an equation might correspond to reality, and which do not.


    So all your things like antimatter, virtual particles etc can be just a mathematical formula artifacts which have nothing to do with reality.

    See: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0501052


    Introduction to PT-Symmetric Quantum Theory


    See


    https://www.quantamagazine.org…mann-hypothesis-20170404/


    Physicists are attempting to map the distribution of the prime numbers to the energy levels of a particular quantum system.


    How using complex numbers solve problems that are critical in LENR.


    I address this issue here


    The process by which the proton decays in LENR


    In general use Quaternions: a generalization of complex numbers.


    Science is using a new number system now that more accurately describes vector position in 3d space. Its called Quaternions: a generalization of complex numbers. Somebody could rework Gibbs-Heaviside math based on this new number system.

    Maxwell's equations might fit nicely into the Quaternion notation without much loss of generalization.


    It's something useful that Wyttenbach can do.


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.







    Wyttenbach, you really need to go back to the drawing board. You are so far off that you are not even wrong. I am sorry to say that you are wasting your time. Study the standard model and grow to love it.

    axil

    Nice evasion. Stop cut&pasting text from other websites without making it clear that you did. This is usually called plagiarism.

    One of the major accomplishments of the standard model is the discovery of anti matter. This comes right out of Maxwells equations. I just wanted to see if the put down of the Standard model was justified by Wyttenbach's superior reworking of Dirac's concepts in his theory as applied to LENR. You let the cat out of the bag. Now Wyttenbach knows he has to account for anti matter. But what does those negative solutions mean for LENR? I think that you can now explain it, but by your rules do it in your own words.

    Axil, since Wyttenbach did not, to my knowledge, write here of "negative solutions", perhaps you can enlighten us as to the implications of these "negative solutions to the Maxwell equations" for LENR....


    The "negative solutions" of Maxwell equations describe the negative energy states of the solutions.


    We cannot discount the "negative energy'' solutions since the positive energy solutions alone do not form a complete set. Many theorists discount the negative solutions as non physical but these solution are in many cases in fact physical. For example,in the Dirac equations the electron which is localized in space, will have components of its wave function which are "negative energy''. The more localized the state, the greater the "negative energy'' content.


    I am asking if there is a physical description of these Maxwell equations solutions in Wyttenbach's LENR theory.

    Please identify what the negative solutions to the Maxwell equations imply to the physics of the LENR reaction.

    May I make a request of the moderators to not ban anyone based on any posts on this thread, nor remove any posts on this thread. Not only do I enjoy this banter but I am getting tired of censorship of different ideas on "social media". This country used to be about free speech. We the LENR passionates are already not considered mainstream. AA's ideas are in my mind incorrect however a fascinating insight into the human psyche.


    Trolling is becoming a way to project power, both militarily, financially and socially. Trolling is now a well compensated and recognized profession practiced by experts with long years of experience. But where does a budding trollor go to practice his trade when the inexperienced troll is just starting out? There must be threads set aside where a troll can experiment with various trolling methods, to find his own style and flair, and to learn from more experienced trolls so that these experts in the trolling arts can pass on their tried and true methods to those who are willing and eager to work hard and learn. And then there are the drooling and bloodthirsty spectators of the trolling arts who long for a brutal and cutthroat no holds bared to the death contest who enjoy the every minute of the savage and gut wrenching spectacle. Such inexpressible joy is had in being immersed up to the ears in a explosion of trolling in a pugilistic wonderland.

    Attention: Rossi trolles...Please demonstrate your mastery of all knowledge and disprove this theory from Rossi:


    1. Prof July 18, 2018 at 12:03 AM

      Dr Rossi:

      Can you explain in few word which are the bases of your theoretical thinking about your effect?

    2. Andrea Rossi July 18, 2018 at 5:13 AM

      Prof:

      Standard Model:

      elementary particles are tiny vibrating waves, quantistically defined, in a particular field.

      When the temperature reaches the mass of an elementary particle, waves are formed corresponding to those elementary particles.

      When the field of these elementary particles resonates with another field during their interaction, new waves can be raised in the second field corresponding to its temperature and if a third field is resonating with these two fields, further particles are raised corresponding with its temperature.

      This is what I an consider to be tha base of my effect and I also am convinced that the “source field” is made by electrons, the resonating ones are of virtual e.p. and their antiparticles. Due to the fact that the source field has a T=1-2 eV, this explains why we do not have strong radiations during the thermalization process.

      Carl-Oscar and I are preparing a series of heavy experimentation to prove this.

      Maybe I am wrong. I think to be right.

      Warm Regards,

      A.R.

    Oh, OK. Good to know. Homlid's work is a milestone and the Large Hadron Collider is wasted billions. Got it. Like astrology much? If we have that, why bother with the Webb telescope? After the Hubble was such a waste, right? And given homeopathy, do we really need western medical research what with its microbes, chemicals and other messy stuff?

    https://www.newscientist.com/a…spew-out-higgs-particles/


    Quote

    The problem is that an electron-positron collider of the right energy would be even bigger than the LHC. A proposal to build such a machine, the International Linear Collider, has been on the table for some time, but with an estimated price tag of $20 billion, few countries are willing to commit. “It’s not likely to come in the next two decades, maybe not in my lifetime” says David Gross, a Nobel prizewinning theorist at the University of California, Santa Barbara.


    A low energy muon source would cost 20 billions. This money could be saved by using Holmlid's tech.

    Wyttenbach How do you explain the violation of the conservation of the baryon number in these experiments? Thanks


    https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/…rg/nlab/show/baryogenesis


    The production of instantons through the condensation of magnetic flux lines is a means to effect quark confinement.


    There is a number of possible mechanisms that might produce quark deconfinment, one is reconnection of magnetic flux lines, and another is the generation of instantons by magnetic flux lines.


    Ultra dense matter might produce magnetic flux lines as seen in the LION experiments.


    https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0009136


    A Primer on Instantons in QCD

    Please layout (graphically represent) what these molecules look like as follows:


    pN, pD (identified previously) , pD2, p2D and (pD)2


    What does the p designate in the formulas above? Does this mean that the UDH molecule can be formed from a mixture of deuterium and protum?