It is about the intentions of both parties. And since IH's intentions are very clear, especially by the evidence of them showing third parties, that might or might not be asked to testify,
That has nothing remotely to do with the lawsuit. There is not a word about that in the suit. In any case, I.H. was completely normal and within its rights showing third parties anything they wanted.
This lawsuit is not about whatever you people on Planet Rossi imagine it might be.