http://dispatchesfromthefuture…n-update-moves-goalposts/
How soon is soon? lol
I don't know what will happen soon, but actually right now
some guys sit at a beach pouring cocktails paid by your money Mr. Ferrier.
http://dispatchesfromthefuture…n-update-moves-goalposts/
How soon is soon? lol
I don't know what will happen soon, but actually right now
some guys sit at a beach pouring cocktails paid by your money Mr. Ferrier.
So. He sells Plants to a industrial customer who can, if he wants to, reverse engineer.
Why does not he sell a plant to a private customer. A Member of this forum? Or Mats Lewan? There is even a lower threat of reverse engineering because an industrial customer who can by 3 MW plants has more financial means of reverse Engineering than a single person.
Contractually, IH surely does not prohibit him to do so anymore.
I thought to myself that the best way to find out whether me365 and MFMP's COP 2+ had nuclear processes as it's physical origin
would be a ICP-MS analysis.
@me356
What do you think about it?
Would you like to let your fuel be analysed by a third party metrology institute?
Majorana: I dont agree. I am convinced that E-Cat worked from the beginning. We are able to replicate it and not just this, but also a different LENR based devices. Now with COP 2+.
As a physicist, even though in a completely different field, I will only be convinced once you or MFMP
will have conducted an isotope analysis of your fuel ash and find a signifcant isotope shift as compared to natural composition.
I am willing to donate for this analysis and I hereby ask all who read this to donate.
I have valued your great work from the beginning.
I am sure you are honest in every respect. I am just not sure, that your calorimetry is not biased
by an understable, human wishful thinking. Which I have shared many times in the past. A COP of 2 is dangerously low so that such a bias has a large probability.
The sooner you start replicating Holmlid´s work at 100°C not 1400°C the sooner you will be out of this Rossi fire:-).
But I agree there is certainly more action, gossip and drama around Rossi which makes a great kind of a reality TV program for us.
I strongly agree with your first point Dr. Olaffson. But I disagree with the last.
Our task here is too important to waste our time with the clownery of a wannabe inventor.
I would like to discuss which components would be needed for and how expensive
a reproduction attempt of Holmlid and Olaffsons experiment would be.
I am not sure about the prices for excess pressure chambers. Probably a few hundred €/$ should be sufficient. But does anyone have an idea where to buy an affordable yet sufficient vacuum chamber?
I found this one for example: http://www.ebay.de/itm/like/231551817812?lpid=106&chn=ps&ul_noapp=true
150 € would not be too much.
But what about the Hydrogen or Deuterium? Is it too dangerous?
I guess the potassium-doped iron oxide catalysator will be the cheapest component and fortunately completely harmless.
Vaughn told us very clearly that their reactor has not worked since 3 years. Even if this is just because Rossi
did not give them all the informations to protect his Intellectual Property. Do you think it is an honest behaviour to not even allow
his 10 Million dollar investors to find out unambigously if the E-Cat works? For three years.
Call it however you want,
Rossi does not deserve a single portion of attention anymore! That is what he was longing for.
I consider the duty of this forum to be forwarding the development of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction technologies.
This can only be done by investigating and discussing scientific concepts.
Right now there are dozens of threads in which Rossis clownery is discussed, while there is the scientific work of Leif Holmlid and Sveinn Olaffson that
almost no one is paying attention to.
My suggestion is therefore to ban the E-Cat topic from this forum until someone, maybe a court or Rossi himself, provide scientific evidence of it's operation.
Not paying attention to Rossi might be a way to actually force him to become honest.
Rossi repeated many times the following words:" The E-Cat has to be integrated in the market or it will be killed."
One has to be stupid or very naive not to understand that this implies he was given order when , how and if at all to launch the E-Cat.
A slavedriver won't set his slaves free voluntarily.
How to launch it?
There is no way to launch it.
The world is governed by people that are powerful through money. In order to keep their power they need poor people to work for them.
In order to make this majority of poor people continue working for them they need instruments to make them afraid of unemployment.
If the rich would allow a world-changing energy technology to enter the market they would lose a key instrument of intimidation.
All who still think our elected marionettes in the parlaments have any power...
If at the conference he will stay enigmatic, talking but saying nothing at all as in Jannes Q & A - and I suppose he will - i am not intetested.
If you improve thermal insulation of the reactor, it should be possible to reach ssm if insulation is good enough if you have COP > 1.2.
Of course this only holds if electrical stimulation is not too important, meaning doesnt require too much effective power.
Are you planning to insulate the reactor?
You should be able to reach infinite cop or at least very large cop if insulation is thick enough.
X/beta radiation is a stimulation or an emission ?
It would be only temporary (controlable) radiation
Be careful about that statement. I am not so sure if the 100 keV is really the upper limit of the x-ray / y-energy. Moreover the statement that
Ni nanoparticles will shield gammas is nonsense. Hence the interior of the tube could be activated, and that could yield
not so temporary bad surprises.
I hope the mfmp guys are always carrying their dosimeters with them.
Emission. Hazardous emission.
I have hoped that there would be none in LENR due to slow neutron exchange, but it doesn't seem so.
That is and stays the price we have to pay. Nuclear energy <-> radioactivity.
100 kV applied to both ends of a 10 cm long cavity under 3 bar hydrogen pressure?
That must be close to breakdown voltage or even above.
plasma discharges are necessary for the operation.
Answer will be given on wednesday (tomorrow). Stay tuned.
I actually think it's @me356 who posted this.
Update: No it's not. So it's from MFMP, but their last public results did not show any excess heat - strange...
Either they saw/have the pre-print of the 350 day test executive summary Peter Gluck talked of
I don't think so, actually I don't hope so.
, or they have found a way to get reliable excess heat.
That would be great. MFMP are the only ones I trust.
@magicsound
Could you tell us what the message is about?
First: Why was the message sent from Czech Republic?
Second: Can anyone translate "The cookbook is in the signal" ?
I am not a native english speaker.