Spontaneity of nuclear fusion

"Furthermore, it should be evaluated whether these conclusions

about the thermodynamics and kinetics of fusion reactions

could allow the controversial “cold fusion” experiments to be

revisited¹⁴. At low temperature (≈ 10² K) the kinetic energy of

nucleons could be different from that of atoms and molecules

and, therefore, a classical thermodynamic analysis may be

applied when the initial and final states of the reactions considered

are fixed without the presence of subnuclear particles. In

such a case, this analysis shows that thermodynamics should

positively affect fusion carried out at low temperatures. On

the other hand, the low temperature would involve very slow

kinetics that could be responsible for the poor reproducibility

of these experiments and make any application unfeasible."

Quote from Ahlfors

The more recent studies didn’t find any

confirming evidence for cold fusion, such as

production of neutrons reflecting genuine

fusion events.

To much nonsense in the two references. Only SM clerks can believe that cold fusion should produce neutrons.

Quote from Ahlfors

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-021-01407-9

"One might guess the subject had become

uninteresting because most of the key

questions had been settled. But that’s not the

case. The more recent studies didn’t find any

confirming evidence for cold fusion, such as

production of neutrons reflecting genuine

fusion events. But they did find that the

initial debunking of cold fusion in 1989 was

possibly premature, as “the relevant physical

and material conditions had not (and indeed

have not yet) been credibly realized and

thoroughly investigated.” Today the area

remains rich in unexplained phenomena

at the edge of what we can reliably study

experimentally.

In other words, the subject isn’t in the

mainstream of current research, but not

for any particularly good reason. It’s out of

fashion. Such neglected areas may well be far

more common than we usually think. In the

scientific process, important matters often

remain unexamined — or worse, get buried

— even as science moves on."

Display More

Does anybody have a copy of the full piece?

Elon Musk is building Starbase, a city with a spaceport to the Moon, Mars and beyond. Here’s what’s inside

3Nov2021

Elon Musk is building Starbase, a city with a spaceport to the Moon, Mars and beyond. Here's what's inside

If successful, the ambitious spaceport could become the site of multiple annual launches to the Moon and to Mars.

www.sciencefocus.com

If successful, the ambitious spaceport could become the site of multiple annual launches to the Moon and to Mars.
By Stuart Clark

Quote from Gregory Byron Goble

Elon Musk is building Starbase, a city with a spaceport to the Moon, Mars and beyond. Here’s what’s inside

Either he is a prophet that understands that we cannot help planet earth or he is the most dumb idiot to spoil his money on brain farts instead on helping to save the planet.

Quote from Wyttenbach

Either he is a prophet that understands that we cannot help planet earth or he is the most dumb idiot to spoil his money on brain farts instead on helping to save the planet.

I could be wrong, but does anyone else remember years ago Carl Page, or maybe someone else, offering Rossi a meeting with Musk? I think it may have been in Lewan's book. Anyway Rossi refused the offer. If true, maybe he was a save the planet type like us naive, but well intentioned, fools here.

Found this on ECW.

Rossi on Tesla Motors and Elon Musk: ‘We are in Contact’ |

Quote from sam12

Found this on ECW.

https://e-catworld.com/2015/05…n-musk-we-are-in-contact/

Yeah, with "Elon Musk Condos Miami", CEO (and total staff) Andrea Rossi.

Well COP26 is almost over. We're getting closer to saving the planet from climate change, whew!

As the huge headline reads at https://ukcop26.org

Uniting the World To Tackle Climate Change

It reminds me of uniting the world to tackle the coronavirus.

Now, some naysayers may say these are just two global fear mongering schemes to facilitate massive transfers of wealth from the common people and nations to a burgeoning billionaire, assets accruing, technocratic global elite who own more and more and to whom we are more and more indebted and monitored. But please, try to be more positive!

In 1918 the world was helpless as an Influenza pandemic swept much of the globe.

Somehow, we got over it.

In 1921, 100 years ago, the world was helpless against a year of global droughts and floods and heat. Yet somehow, again, we got over it.

If we got over these historic events without massive intervention, just think how much we'll get over present events with massive, society - altering intervention!

PS In case you didn't know that 1921 was a notable year, here's a video you may want to watch.

Enjoy!

A little playground science.using edits as the effects are created.I will post here.

Triggers to effects ect.

For the few.

Sun seismic and

Schumann Resonance Spiking ect.

check with.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC46IzKnhwU7d4xXjFUPVXgQ..

each has a up to 3 day wait

Edit area-..

as they are accidentally created markers.

schumann spike marker 1;00 pm 11/13/21 - elapse time til event= maybe..edit

Marker small CME 1:45.pm 5/11/21 elap time,, til event=

marker 5:50 11 13 schum spike "high side" =

Runaway small- 7:10- schum

AI-Driven Molecular 3D Printing On the Way?

AI-Driven Molecular 3D Printing On the Way?

Remember the early days, when 3D printing was just becoming mainstream? “It’s like a Star Trek replicator!” they said. “Everyone can make anything! It’s

3dprinting.com

I'd like to know what molecular layers are wanted after electroplating in LEC ...

Is 3D printing easier? Better? Should CMNS energy technologists have 3D printing experts in their teams? Metamaterial experts?

New technology, 3D molecular printing. NASA has led the field in most 3D printing technologies since early on and still does. Nanotechnology, metamaterials, molecular printing and CMNS energy technological innovation... A strengthening symbiosis?

Of course this begs the question...

Who holds a-priori on CMNS energy technology patents?

Quote

What enabled Lattice’s new approach were recent advances in nanotechnology. “Nanotechnology and LENR are joined at the hip”, said Larsen. “It is one of the reasons why this could not be done back in 1989-90. Before our work, nobody had a grasp on the theory of neutron creation from protons and electrons in tabletop apparatus; nor on exactly how to apply advanced nanotechnology to build well-performing prototype devices.” - End quotes

Alchemy 2.0 – Low Energy Nuclear Reactor Creates Gold and Platinum

Thursday March 06, 2014

Alchemy 2.0 – Low Energy Nuclear Reactor Creates Gold and Platinum | Kitco Commentary

‘Joined at the hip” is such a strange euphemism.

However, it is very inclusive.

....

Quote from Paradigmnoia

such a strange euphemism

Yes...from a reference to 'Siamese Twins'.

"LENR research is best served as multidisciplinary art." - gbgoble

"NASA- Zawodny - USPTO Patent Application on LENRs No 20110255645 - Published Oct. 20, 2011"

NASA- Zawodny - USPTO Patent Application on LENRs No 20110255645 - Pu…

A NASA LENR-related patent application that lists Dr. Joseph Zawodny as Inventor, senior staff physicist at NASA-LaRC, was published by the USPTO on October 2…

www.slideshare.net

Quote

A NASA LENR-related patent application that lists Dr. Joseph Zawodny as Inventor, senior staff physicist at NASA-LaRC, was published by the USPTO on October 20, 2011.

What is significant about this recently unveiled patent activity by a U.S. government agency is that NASA clearly believes that LENRs are real phenomena, that they are potentially commercially valuable for power generation applications, and that it is worth it for NASA to spend taxpayer dollars in an attempt to secure an early patent position for the U.S. government. In addition, careful reading of US #20110255645 makes it abundantly clear is that the device physics underlying NASA’s application is directly derived from the Widom-Larsen theory of LENRs. In fact, Lattice patent US #7,893,414 B2, “Apparatus and Method for Absorption of Incident Gamma Radiation and its Conversion to Outgoing Radiation at Less Penetrating, Lower Energies and Frequencies, Inventors: Lewis Larsen and Allan Widom, issued February 22, 2011, is cited in [0020] as prior art and incorporated in its entirety as part of NASA’s application. - End quotes

In the same vein...

I've often thought Dennis referred to nondisclosure enforcement by those guiding LENR research on the east coast (NASA) and those enforcing nondisclosure of LENR research on the west coast, in Texas and a number of other places. Ultimately the DTRA/DoD AEC and other national security concerns.

The argument with James was over Dennis not giving him a straight answer...

James took Dennis's response as a threat.

...you have your goons on the west coast and we have ours in the east...

I wish I could see the YouTube clip again. It is no longer available yet others here may remember seeing it... also, how odd it was.

A bit of corroboration... 9 years ago

NASA, Widom-Larsen and LENR Infighting

In a rambling article about low energy nuclear reaction politics and infighting, New Energy Times Publisher and Senior Editor Steven Krivit discussed the PR…

donalfagan.wordpress.com

....searched on Youtube for LENR Nasa, and ran across this eight minute conference clip in which James Martinez, a cold fusion promoter among many other pursuits, claims that he called NASA’s Dennis Bushnell expecting to talk to a fellow enthusiast, but was threatened instead. Martinez goes on to talk about meeting a man connected with film version of The Saint. That was significant to him because the MacGuffin in the plot was a formula for cold fusion....

COV-19

https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Daten/Inzidenz_Impfstatus.xlsx?__blob=publicationFile

Link to German history data usually 4 weeks off...

Vaccine efficiency did go down 13--> 6x for age < 60. 8->3x for age >60. This is a very coarse and dilettantish statistic to hide the facts for age > 70...

The same trend is also seen for hospital cases. Germany also partly used Moderna and has a less strict lock down than UK. But week 42 seems to be a turning point for the vaccine effect we can see in age class <60!

So we can note that so far only UK provides accurate data - but bundled with fake information about vaccines...

Quote

An excursion on math and statistics related to Covid…

Covid misinformation spreads because so many Americans are awful at math

…

To correctly measure vaccine effectiveness, then, you need to compare the mortality and hospitalization rates for vaccinated and unvaccinated people of the same age. And when you do this, it becomes clear how risky being unvaccinated is. In Oklahoma, for instance, the state says around 17 percent of seniors are not fully vaccinated. But those 17 percent account for 70 percent of all senior hospitalizations in the state over the past month. That means unvaccinated seniors in Oklahoma are 11 times more likely to be hospitalized for covid than vaccinated seniors are.

…

https://www.washingtonpost.com…a-0255edc02eb7_story.html

Display More

Yes vaccination reduces risk of hospitalization and death. Might be less than 11 times however because it is unclear that the chart from hospitalizations is counting federally administered vaccinations. (Other places on the page explicitly mention if the federally administered vaccines are counted or not.)

Regardless, given a 10 fold reduction in Covid hospitalization risk with full vaccination, it should be noted that this is relative risk. What is the absolute risk of hospitalization? From that page it can be calculated that the 65 and older population of Oklahoma is about 635,000. In the last month, 506 people older than 64 have been admitted to hospital with Covid. That is less than one in a thousand. Extrapolating, in the last ten months the risk of a senior being admitted with Covid might be about one in a hundred. Given that full vaccination lowers hospitalization risk tenfold, and 1 in 100 people are admitted in the last ten months, then getting fully vaccinated reduces hospitalization risk from roughly nine in a thousand to one in a thousand over that timeframe.

Maybe if Americans were better at math they would be even less interested in vaccination.

Quote

Quote from Wyttenbach As said children should first learn math before they try to teach math. 50% in USA has had a CoV-19 infection so the vaccinated group is only halve the size. So your claimed factor would be 5.5. But in UK > 90% of age 70 hospital patients are double vaxx. In USA hospitals do not know the vaccine status or do not allow to report it for "political reasons". Do you really believe that UK/USA are two different worlds?

Quote from THH

17% unvaccinated > 70 in US sounds about right - they have been more affected by antivax disinformation than the UK, because of the messy politics.

Looking at the Oklahoma data page, a whopping 98.2 percent of people age 65 and over received at least one vaccine, showing they were willing to try. Yet 'only' 82.7 percent of them are now fully vaccinated. I see a trend. Across age groups, between 5 and 15 percent of people who got jabbed don't seem to get the second jab. I wonder why? I suspect that most of them had a sufficiently bad reaction to the first vaccination that they don't want another, despite the coercion to get a second jab.

A person who is 40 years old has a very slim chance of getting hospitalized with Covid.

Yet he has maybe a one in ten or twenty chance of having a very unpleasant reaction to the vaccine, possibly bad enough to seek medical attention.

That's just the first dose. Apparently reactions after the second dose tend to be much worse.

Quote from Mark U

Yes vaccination reduces risk of hospitalization and death.

But those 17 percent account for 70 percent of all senior hospitalizations in the state over the past month. That means unvaccinated seniors in Oklahoma are 11 times more likely to be hospitalized for covid than vaccinated seniors are.

This is a function of time and age. As you can see from other country statistics the factor 11 is only true for 1..4 months post jab. then it halves within 6 more weeks and totally breaks down after 6 months post jab. (Not so for Moderna) We also know from Swiss statistics than 1 jab is not unvaccinated. The risk after two jabs is identical up to age 70! So the above is a big cheating as these folks count in 1 jab vaccinated to unvaccinated to fake the rate.

Typical vaccine terror state propaganda!

Always remember that > 50% are protected by a natural infection not by the vaccine!. CDC cannot give a single reference to a natural infection breakthrough case with a follow up death!

Quote

India just completed the largest ever done study in mankind history. All India states except Taminal Nadu opted in the study. Tamil Nadu joined 4 week later....

First 4 weeks results from June 2021 Tamil Nadu cases up 3x. All other states cases down > 10x. 80% of India is free of CoV-19 since 5 months now.

Today 96% of India is COV-19 free with 3 states left over with about very low 1500 daily cases among 300 mio. people, what counts as COV-19 free.

Only the tiny vaccine control group of Kerala (+ small county Mizoram) still struggles with a high case/death load.

So about 100 mio people have been treated with Ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc.

This was about 300 mio. Dose of Ivermectin!

The treatment kit used:: https://www.indiamart.com/prod…e-tablet-12373324255.html

Study did show full success. No more CoV-19 in 80% of all India places and a few low incidence states.

No more CoV-19 waves seen since almost 6 months now.

Display More

Thanks to Jurg above, I ordered some Z-packs (Ziverdo kits) from India last night.

10 packs for less than $3 each, and $35 shipping to Canada.

I have friends, family and neighbours who might be well served with this.

My online banking was giving me trouble with Western Union, so I tried out wise.com for the first time and it worked great. An especially small fee if one is debiting the bank account directly. One can also use a credit or debit card.