The Playground

Axil - it is interesting that you bring up DKG's flowmeter deception.
They were busted by a National Instruments expert who spotted the algo "mistake".
What are you attempting to imply?

Hank - negative. Is anyone from Hydrofusion observing the Quark test?

Completely unrelated to anything else that has been said here — how does one delete one of one's own posts? Occasionally I'll post something and then have second thoughts and want to delete it, but I haven't found the delete button. I assume this is not a special capability handed out to only certain forum participants.

@Eric Walker

Open your post with "extended edit" and tick the delete post box.

In my case it wasn't a second thought, rather a second click on "submit"

Quote from Dewey Weaver

Axil - it is interesting that you bring up DKG's flowmeter deception.
They were busted by a National Instruments expert who spotted the algo "mistake".
What are you attempting to imply?

There hasn't been one major demo not besmirch by some sort of caloriminity gambit including the Lugano test that IH conducted. At least DKG got far enough down the road to be besmirched without the help of Rossi. Now that IH does not have Rossi's shirttails to hang onto, how many years will it take for IH to get off the ground using their own people and LENR IP. IH and their backers should not criticize others who have at least made and effort. Without Rossi, IH is nothing until they prove otherwise. Money can't buy everything.

Axil - You've become good for a reliable chuckle every time you post - thanks.

Getting caught draining system water before volume can be measured in the early morning hours of inspection day is another one of many ways to besmirch one's calorimetry. Using an improperly spec'd flowmeter is yet another. For your information, the besmirchment list is long.

You can contemplate hanging onto Rossi's shirttails as long as you possibly can while you answer the following question: What LENR research have you funded lately?

Quote from Dewey Weaver

Axil - You've become good for a reliable chuckle every time you post - thanks.

Getting caught draining system water before volume can be measured in the early morning hours of inspection day is another one of many ways to besmirch one's calorimetry. Using an improperly spec'd flowmeter is yet another. For your information, the besmirchment list is long.

You can contemplate hanging onto Rossi's shirttails as long as you possibly can while you answer the following question: What LENR research have you funded lately?

IH has made a huge mistake in pissing Rossi off. He is out to destroy IH as Rossi eventually destroyed DGT. Be realistic. You have seen what Rossi can do in the tests that he has run for IH. That should put the fear of God into your souls. All you can do is make noise and wait for the ax to fall. When those quarks hit the street, kiss those millions goodby.

There are a few people I trust as honest that I might fund, the main among them is MFMP since I know anything that they come up with cannot be used by IH. When MFMP shows a willingness to include particle detection in their test plans then that is when my contributions to them start to flow.

Quote from Dewey Weaver

Getting caught draining system water before volume can be measured in the early morning hours of inspection day

I think they will argue that this had been "regular maintenance".

Axil - did I hit a nerve? You started the conversation about DKG and calorimeters - is the conversation not going the way that you had hoped?

IH is out $11.5M for the moment and Rossi is the angry one - we'll see how far that gets him.

You've disqualified yourself with your LENR funding answer - thanks for playing.

Tom P - but of course, what was I thinking? Maintenance must be maintained at all times.
Silly me! Maintenance, maintenance, maintenance.....

The conversation on P.R. is presently shifting to "must maintain, must maintain....must.....

Quote from Dewey Weaver

Axil - did I hit a nerve? You started the conversation about DKG and calorimeters - is the conversation not going the way that you had hoped?

IH is out $11.5M for the moment and Rossi is the angry one - we'll see how far that gets him.

You've disqualified yourself with your LENR funding answer - thanks for playing.

It does not take much for you or IH to hit my nerve, very easy. If I want to walk in the LENR barnyard, I realize that I am sure to pick up some filth on my shoes.

Dewey - As we all know, the customer had special quality requirements to the delivered steam.

They demanded "fresh steam" every day!

Axil - sorry about that. In your condition, it sounds like the playground might not be a healthy place for you to hang out right now. Get your shoes cleaned up, get your nose wiped, diaper changed and come on back to the party like a big boy with your chin held high. There is a sandbox full of fun just around the corner.

Tom P - but of course they did! Or maybe it was fresh hot water. I get confused looking at the data.

One thing is for sure - the ability to hold steady state temps and pressures for a month at a time is truly astounding! IH has purchased one heck of a machine!! It even held steady state on temps and pressures when it was turned off. I'm telling you - the world has never seen anything thing so great and wonderful.

Dewey - Wow, a self sustaining and fully regulated perpetual motion machine.

For such a great invention 11,5m$ are peanuts.

Also, this machine should find it's way directly to the Smithsonian.

Quote from Dewey Weaver

Axil - sorry about that. In your condition, it sounds like the playground might not be a healthy place for you to hang out right now. Get your shoes cleaned up, get your nose wiped, diaper changed and come on back to the party like a big boy with your chin held high. There is a sandbox full of fun just around the corner.

If IH had only treated Rossi in a more gentle way, then you would be selling the Quark rather than fighting it.

Italo R.
Dear Dr. Rossi, I know that it is premature, but can you tell us if you are satisfied about how the test is going till now?
Kind Regards,Italo

R.Andrea Rossi
Italo R.:
So far so good.
F8.
Warm Regards, A.R.

Will the Chinese be disappointed? Will they want their 200 million back?

Quote from Hank Mills

Dewey,

Does the ERV report state that the 100.1 temperature was measured or was it a place holder?

Rossi claims that the ERV disregarded temperatures below and above. If that is the case, the report is not claiming that the temperature held steady at…

I hope Dewey will answer this.

You might know that already but FYI Rossi was asked if by chance 100.1 was a just a placeholder in the report; he replied that there is no such value in the report.

It seems much harder to fake/screw up electric power measurement than calorimetry.

I wonder why Rossi would switch to electrical output if he was a fraudster. Looks like he is going to have to renew his entire bag of tricks!