Peter Gluck does a great service for the LENR community by maintaining his blog and posting daily updates.
When it comes to the debate about his support of Andrea Rossi, I only wish there were more people willing to open their minds to a middle ground.
In my opinion, IH has not proven their bold assertions about the one year test and a whole host of associated issues. For example, that James A. Bass is a fictitious actor, there was zero manufacturing going on of any kind, there was no customer, JM Products was a fictitious entity, etc. What they have been able to do is point out a great deal of high strangeness, suspicious behavior, lack of responsiveness by members of Rossi's team, and questions that deserve comprehensive detailed answers. We do not know what this means yet. As someone who is convinced the E-Cat technology works, my guess is that there could have likely been less than open and cooperate behavior on the part of team Rossi. But I'm not going to go further than that without some solid evidence.
Pete Gluck is entitled to his opinions. Overall, I agree with him. But when we know so little, it's "easy" but also "ridiculous" to get highly emotional and angry at others with different view points. For example, I think that it is HIGHLY likely some level of excess heat was produced, some type of manufacturing was taking place, James A. Bass was a REAL engineer, and that the test was indeed real. But I could be wrong. After all this time, IH and Rossi have yet to "go at it" and try all out to prove their case. There is a possibility that tomorrow, next week, or next information supporting or condemning the reality of the one year test could be revealed. Or, the truth could be somewhere in between: a very real test but without open, honest, and sincere communication to the company that OWNED THE PLANT.
But regardless what happens with the lawsuit, it will have zero impact on my opinion of the technology.