Did IH's motion to dismiss ruin them?
My contention is the following:
For IH's motion to dismiss to hold water IH inherently have to accept that IH no longer have any rights to either the manufacture or sale of E-Cat's in the US, Russia, China, the Arab states etc and Rossi is now Free to license anyone else or to make E-Cat products himself.
If they try to claim the contract still subsists their motion to dismiss fails.
Rossi has them neatly skewered on the horns of the dilemma.
Kind Regards Walker