Display MoreRossi as has been his habit takes an excessively complex way to calculate output power and makes it go wrong in his favour.
Let me re-phrase that, for AA. Rossi's output power measurement for the Qx (original version) and after makes a whole load of assumptions, based on partial measurements from the wrong equipment, that are not true. Therefore it is impossible to know what is the real output power.
This time (the original and published Qx measurements) the most obvious issue, not often addressed, is that he assumes black-body spectrum from a (fluorescent) clearly non-black-body source.
Of course he has the non-measured input power as well, but this is a tour de force. With both not correctly measured, Rossi can conjure very high out/in power ratios.
"Rossi as has been his habit takes an excessively complex way to calculate output power and makes it go wrong in his favour.
Let me re-phrase that, for AA. Rossi's output power measurement for the Qx (original version) and after makes a whole load of assumptions, based on partial measurements from the wrong equipment, that are not true. Therefore it is impossible to know what is the real output power."
You make that sound like a bad thing, not just shenanigans. How rude of you. (also, too, which one of the smilies is a sarcasm one, assuming we have one?).