Oh please. First, I am not offended by "ele" in any way and don't need to be defended about what this person writes. Second, what Zeus cites is mostly my *accurate* description of what Roger Barker did with and to Peter Gluck's blog, basically a mockery, while Gluck is extremely ill and unable to see and thus unable to defend the blog -- something Roger Barker knew and took advantage of. YOU tell me the sort of person who does that. Peter does deserve defense against Roger Barker and I helped provide it by notifying and assisting Georgina Popescu who is Peter's temporary custodian and not a tech person.
"Negligent and incompetent" are not insults when they are applied to people and organizations which clearly discharged their obligations in that manner and when evidence for said negligence and incompetence is presented.