Arguing over minutia of a proposed theory seems like debating the color of the sun. People interpret things differently so if there is a particular problem you have with the theory, could you let it be stated so we can have a rational dialogue?
From the experiment sited in this post as folllows:
Bose-Einstein condensate created at room temperature
Instead of atoms, condensation was achieved using quasiparticles.
As in this referenced experiment, the BEC nature of the SAFIRE system can be confirmed by showing that the light produced by that system is polarized as would be produced by a polariton laser. Moreover, all strange radiation indicators (tracks, EVO impressions, transmuted material... see MFMP data) are made visible…
The experimenters were able to tell what was causing the reaction that they were seeing by observing as data the nature of the light that was being emitted by the experiment.
In other words, the electronic properties of the material itself replaced the need for cooling, allowing the quasiparticles to gather and condense into a BEC. The experimenters confirmed this effect by detecting the telltale light emission.
In these quantum mechanical based experiments it is difficult to extract cause and effect relationships. This uncertainty tends to let the imagination run wild that eventually result in counterproductive thinking which undercuts analysis and discovery.
Polariton condensates are coherent and as a coherent generator of light, that light will always be polarized. Polarized light generation by an experiment is a true indicator of the nature of the underlying mechanism that is driving the process under observation.
I have always believed if a experiment does not see expected indicators that point to the major underlying processes central to mechanisms of the experiment, there is an excellent chance that the experiment does not support those theoretical assumptions. For example, if no gamma and/or neutron radiation of the predicted nuclear reactions is observed coming from an experiment, there is a excellent chance that the experiment is not nuclear energy centric. The experimenter cannot just assume the possibility that the lack of these expected indicators is a "miracle".
I know of one over unity high temperature plasma based system where polarized light is produced by the reaction and that system must be driven by a polariton condensate. This data say much about the mechanisms that underlie this system that the inventor does not want to reveal about his IP as follows:
2021-04-02 17:11 KeithT
Is the light emitted by the Ecat SKLed polarized?
2021-04-03 08:34 Andrea Rossi