ENG8 - new plasma energy system

  • The hypothesis that informs the ENG8 technology is that the EVO termination is the energy production mechanism that generates the release of energetic electrons open termination. In light of this posit, to optimize energy production, it is important to understand how EVOs are created and energized so that their optimized production can optimize electron generation.


    According to nanoplasmonic theory, a polariton condensate can form in at least two ways. It can form on the surface of a metal substrate and is optimized when that surface is cracked and pitted in order to produce quantum voids so that electrons and photons can be made entangled, but in this case, the condensate is affixed to the surface of the substrate but the motion of the condensate is limited to its location of creation. Or the condensate can form on the surface of a metal nanoparticle when both electrons and photons are abundant in the ambient environment.


    Spark produced electrons, photons, and metal nanoparticles are optimized to allows EVOs to be produced in optimized amounts to support gainful energy production when they terminate. The design of the reaction becomes an exercise in nanoparticle optimization as follows:


    Spark discharge synthesis is a simple and versatile method for producing nanoparticles and associated EVOs. The process uses only gas, electrodes, and electricity. The spark produces an aerosol of pure particles from two ablated metals, which are then transferred to a downstream plasma. The resulting nanoparticles are made of pure metal, and no post-processing steps such as drying or surfactant decomposition is required.


    Spark discharge synthesis is carried out in a pure gas atmosphere that protects the nanoparticles from contamination. The method is also environmentally friendly because it does not use precursors.


    The composition of the nanoparticles generated by spark ablation depends on several factors, most notably on the properties of the electrode material, the initial polarity of the electrodes, and the electrical characteristics of the discharge circuit.


    Here are some production parameters that affect optimized nanoparticle production in a plasma which may or may not be appropriate for EVO optimization:


    Evaporation and condensation: A physical method that converts metals into nanopowders


    Thermal plasma: An effective heat source for synthesizing nanoparticles


    Silane-hydrogen plasmas: Used to synthesize silicon nano-crystals in the gas phase


    PVP: Plays a role in controlling the size of nanoparticles, decreasing the speed of agglomeration, and improving the crystallinity of nanoparticles

    Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is a large polymer that can be used in nanoparticle production as a surface stabilizer, growth modifier, nanoparticle dispersant, and reducing agent. PVP can prevent particle aggregation and control the average particle size and shape. PVP molecules are not easily displaced by other molecules and offer excellent steric stability. PVP-coated particles are stable in a wide variety of polar solvents. The use of PVP would be a research project to metal nanoparticle optimization.


    SEE: https://nanocomposix.com/pages…lent%20steric%20stability.

    .

    Spherical metal nanoparticles: Have a great impact on the additive manufacturing industry


    Once the nanoparticles and associated EVOs are generated, they may now be brought to a state of growth and subsequent instability by applying EMF such as RF or microwaves in the plasma.



    PVPPVP

  • The hypothesis that informs the ENG8 technology is that the EVO termination is the energy production mechanism that generates the release of energetic electrons open termination.

    I recommend this sentence for all investors. Like cooking a stomach flying hyper brownie covered with elephant honey and mermaid glace.

  • Spoken as a true expert. The greatest physicist of our time without any formal training.

  • FYI, Alan still has not received the raw data from his visit 2 weeks ago.


    Electrifying developments at ENG8


    16 Aug 2023

    To kick off the process of validating our catalysed fusion EnergiCells in the UK, our fusion specialists have visited the UK Atomic Energy Authority (AEA) at Culham Science Park in Oxfordshire, where we are are setting up a UK base, followed by an analysis at the University of Cambridge, Materials Science and Metallurgy Centre.

  • FYI, Alan still has not received the raw data from his visit 2 weeks ago.


    Electrifying developments at ENG8

    Dear Shane D,


    Who will determine how fusion is occurring in the ENG8 system without the generation of any nuclear originating radiation: the UK Atomic Energy Authority (AEA) at Culham Science Park in Oxfordshire or the ENG8 fusion specialists or a collaboration between these two groups, or some other group(s)?


    Will these exciting results of this work be open source and if so where can this info be made available?

  • Who will determine how fusion is occurring in the ENG8 system without the generation of any nuclear originating radiation: the UK Atomic Energy Authority (AEA) at Culham Science Park in Oxfordshire or the ENG8 fusion specialists or a collaboration between these two groups, or some other group(s)?


    Will these exciting results of this work be open source and if so where can this info be made available?

    Don't get too excited. ENG8 are not able to measure radiation with the set-up I saw, and AFAIK have not done so yet (I asked). I certainly didn't meet any fusion specialists there, but perhaps they were elsewhere The close involvement of UKAEA is not guaranteed, since renting space in the Culham science park is not quite same thing, and as this is a commercial operation information is unlikely to be open-sourced.


    Apart from that you are spot-on.

  • Was quickly re-reading a book chapter that I'd posted in the book thread (thanks for the reminder, Alan) - and came upon the following illustration:



    The term "GA" stands for "Gliding Arc" - and it is the arc that can exists in a fast flowing gas (notably, in this case, air at normal atmospheric pressure). Obviously, I was reminded of the ENG8 device that was tested recently in Portugal.


    On page 21 of the book chapter, it says:

    Quote

    The non-equilibrium GA is a very sophisticated physical phenomenon: this transitional quasi-equilibrium/non-equilibrium discharge is essentially non-uniform in time and in space, and includes ‘mysterious’ internal transition from thermal to non-thermal mechanisms of ionization.

    So, as is so often the case, these odd gas behaviours aren't exactly new - but (partial) knowledge of them has been languishing in the vast backwaters of previously studied, recorded, and filed phenomena.

    "The most misleading assumptions are the ones you don't even know you're making" - Douglas Adams

    Edited once, last by Frogfall ().

  • but (partial) knowledge of them has been languishing in the vast backwaters of previously studied, recorded, and filed phenomena.

    I would add that anomalous behaviors are doomed to be tossed aside because the research becomes a dead end, specially if it goes “against the grain” of what is considered stablished.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • Quote

    A procession of the damned.

    By the damned, I mean the excluded.

    We shall have a procession of data that Science has excluded.

    Charles Fort

    The Book Of The Damned

    Although, I would add that in this case the data has not been tossed aside. It has been studied, and logged - and is there for all to see, if only we bother to look. The problem is that there is so much data that people have to split their studies into nominal "branches" of science - and there is little incentive to cross the divide. Essentially, these phenomena exist in the liminal spaces between people's models of the world.

    "The most misleading assumptions are the ones you don't even know you're making" - Douglas Adams

    Edited once, last by Frogfall ().

  • External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    New video made during the course of my visit to see an ENG8 demo of George's device at Culham Innovation Center.

  • External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    New video made during the course of my visit to see an ENG8 demo of George's device at Culham Innovation Center.

    If they mentioned Egely at all, I missed it. Investors and independent scientists there seemed genuinely impressed. Surely not the types to be bamboozled, although we have learned the hard way...


    Only thing new I heard was that ENG8 would do a road show in the US in Dec/Jan to showcase the tech to investors.

  • Just had a chance to see it in one sitting. It is a really tantalizing video because of all the people talking about it in certain and upbeat terms.


    By far, for me, the most impressive part is to hear an UL representative confirming the 5x electrical input/ electrical output ratio, and saying he sees room for improvement. That is something to behold. UL is a very respected technical certification entity.


    Shane D. , George Egely is mentioned, and shown in frame, by surname (not name) and praised for his humility by one of the investors.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • I think is rather important to highlight that a device that produces 5 times more electric energy than it consumes is truly a game changer on its own.


    I can only speculate on the total COP as it must produce heat, and also light.


    The statement of the UL employee is really tantalizing. I don’t want to sound too optimistic, but this is very good news.


    I truly hope replication comes quickly.


    We are aware that the device is not easy to replicate and that the process is rather destructive for the electrodes, so there’s a lot of need for improvement, but I think this device has a great potential as we move forward.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.