Mickael McKubre have made a critical analysis of that report and this include some critics.
http://www.infinite-energy.com…ne/issue118/analysis.html
maybe you can answers to some detail.
- one is about the exagerated uncertainties on electric measurement.
- there is also the choise not to measure power on the reactor itself (I imagine this is to avoid critics).
- lack of calibration is the same temperature range, and lack of multiple working point to start at least an extrapolation
- lack of final recalibration
- transparency of alumin have to be treated in the report
- independent measurement of temperature missing (maybe recorded?)
- no control of convection
- more detail required on the envelop and procedure of sample analysis