Posts by RobertBryant

Just general theoretical thinking from a generalist

Why does the styrene catalyst relate to dense hydrogen conglomerates

"

Fe2O3 has a hexagonal lattice structure whereas Fe3O4 has a cubic lattice structure.
This lattice structure change, along with the high mechanical forces in the catalyst bed,
results in degradation or pulverization of the catalyst particles. "

It makes sense that the hexagonal array is useful for ethyl benzene/ styrene which may fit have bits that fit into into dimples on the array..

but how do the dense hydrogen arrays H7, H19 fit into them..if the ditance between H atoms is so small..

perhaps dense hydrogen( based on Coulombic thinking is not so dense

but instead has long range magnetic bonds???

https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/…df?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

https://www.sciencedirect.com/…cle/pii/S0039602815003362

Quote from THHuxleynew

- may I suggest that the words THH rhetoric

You may suggest this

but I would suggest you get rid of the rhetoric and the hyperbole

the expression " full oneself with a cocktail of drugs "is unhelpful hyperbolic rhetoric..

like "without prejudice... join the dots"

outstanding magic bullet etc etc..

which suggest that THH has no sensible argument or perhaps is attention seeking? "batty as it sounds"

Quote from Wyttenbach

a popular political movement of the WWS period.

Hitler had different predilections .. which did not include Mendelssohn

but Beethoven's 'Moon;ight Sonata" was OK.

"Let me come with you. What a moon there is tonight!
The moon is kind – it won’t show
that my hair turned white.

The moon will turn my hair to gold again.

You wouldn’t understand.
Let me come with you." from a Greek poet

and how many of the LENR researchers

have white hair or no hair..now?

I think I will soon graduate to become one..

Quote from THHuxleynew

So doctors generally reckon stuffing yourself full of cocktails of drugs is unhelpful

DR THH rhetoric is generally unhelpful blather.. who is stuffing themselves with a cocktail of drugs like pizzas?

quercetin + zinc = 2 .. vit D3 is failrly common in the older set anyway...

I recommended all 3 for my 92 year old Dad. in NZ as a precaution..

his Covid mortality risk is 10% even with masks and social distancing, hand hygiene

and there is nothing available on prescription from his daughter...the local physician

.or any physician

Bob Greenyer

Baranov paper in English

20keV electrons on Bismuth

"BARANOV D.S., BARANOVA O.D. EVIDENCE OF THE FORMATION AND DECAY OF GIANT LONG-LIEVED NUCLEAR MOLECULES EXON 2012 "

https://www.researchgate.net/p…V1TsepiAyCX90mgFeQ&_iepl=

A.

Quote from Gennadiy Tarassenko

M.Fomichev-Zamilov

Это человек?

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ultramax

Quote from THHuxleynew

this thread seems to have been taken over by antivaxer

based on what? THH bias? more empty rhetoric 'batty as it sounds"

Ivermectin update from Rajters

publication imminent. who knows?

https://www.reddit.com/r/iverm…view_with_drs_jeanjaques/

Ivermectin Cost $10-20

Remdesevir.... Cost ..$5700 ?

cooperative effort of 20-40 institutions needed for RCT.. (BigPharma- free)

time = death

contact [email protected]

Let's play Connect the bullet points..

in the global playground

https://www.globalresearch.ca/…narrative-created/5717275

• 1. You stop doctors from using the drug in ways it is most likely to be effective
• 2. You prevent or limit use in outpatients by controlling the supply of the drug,
• 3. You play up the danger of the drug,
• 4. You limit clinical trials to hospitalized patients, instead of testing the drug in outpatients,
• 5. You design clinical trials to give much too high a dose,
• 6. You design clinical trials to collect almost no safety data, so any cause of death due to drug toxicity will be attributed to the disease instead of the drug.
• 7. You issue rules for use of the drug based on the results of the UK Recovery study, which overdosed patients..
• 8. You publish, in the world’s most-read medical journal, the Lancet, an observational study from a huge worldwide database that says use of chloroquine drugs caused significantly increased mortality.

Then 3 European countries announce they will not allow doctors to prescribe the drug.

Then Sanofi announced it would no longer supply the drug for use with Covid, and would halt its two hydroxychloroquine clinical trials, based on the Lancet study.

• 9. Even after hundreds of people renounced the Lancet‘s observational study due to easily identified fabrications–the database used in the study did not exist,

and the claimed numbers did not agree with known numbers of cases–the Lancet held firm for two weeks, serving to muddy the waters about the trial, until finally 3 of its 4 coauthors (but not the journal)

retracted the study. You make sure very few media report that the data were fabricated and the “study” was fraudulent. You let people believe the original story: that hydroxychloroquine routinely kills.Remdesivir for Covid-19: $1.6 Billion for a “Modestly Beneficial” Drug?10. You ensure federal agencies like FDA and CDC hew to your desired policies. Another example: you have FDA make unsubstantiated and false claims, such as: “Hospitalized patients were likely to have greater prospect of benefit (compared to ambulatory patients with mild illness)“

and claim the chloroquine drugs have a slow onset of action.

• 11. You make sure to avoid funding/encouraging clinical trials that test drug combinations like hydroxychloroquine with zinc, with azithromycin, or with both,
• 12. You have federal and UN agencies make false, illogical claims based on models rather than human data.
• 13. You create an NIH Guidelines committee for Covid treatment recommendations, in which 16 members have or had financial entanglements with Gilead,
• 14. You frighten doctors so they don’t prescribe hydroxychloroquine, because prescribing outside the new NIH “standard of care” leaves them open to malpractice lawsuits.
• 15. You manage to control the conduct of most trials around the world by specially designing the WHO-managed Solidarity trials, currently conducted in 35 countries. WHO halted hydroxychloroquine clinical trials around the world, twice. You stop the trial before the data safety monitoring board has looked at your data, a move that is unlikely to be consistent with trial protocol. WHO’s trial in over 400 hospitals overdosed patients with 2.0 g hydroxychloroquine in the first 24 hours. The trial was halted days after the toxic doses were exposed (by me). The trial involved doctors around the world typing minimal patient information into an online WHO platform, which assigned the patient a treatment. The only “safety” information collected during the trial was whether patients required oxygen, a ventilator, or died. This hid side effects of every drug tested. Given a study so designed by WHO, what do you think the likelihood is that WHO correctly randomized subjects, and honestly analyzed the data? I should mention that WHO’s initial plan for its Solidarity trial entirely omitted the chloroquine drugs, but they were added at the urging of participating nations. WHO’s fallback position appears to have been to use toxic doses.
• 16. You have the WHO pressure governments to stop doctors prescribing hydroxychloroquine.
• 17. You have the WHO pressure professional societies to stop doctors prescribing hydroxychloroquine.
• 18. You make sure that the most-consulted US medical encyclopedia, UptoDate, provides bad guidance to physicians, advising them to restrict hydroxychloroquine to only patients in clinical trials, citing the above sources of information.

• 19. You have the head of the Coronavirus Task Force, Dr. Tony Fauci, insist the drug cannot be used in the absence of strong evidence…while he insisted exactly the opposite in the case of the MERS coronavirus outbreak several years ago, when he recommended an untested drug combination for use…
• 20. You convince the population that the crisis will be long-lasting. You have the 2nd richest man in the world, and biggest funder of the WHO, Bill Gates, keep repeating to the media megaphone that we cannot go back to normal until everyone has been vaccinated or there is a perfect drug. (The Gates Foundation helped design the WHO clinical trials, and Gates is heavily invested in pharmaceuticals and vaccines.)
• 21. You have CDC (with help from FDA) prevent the purchase of coronavirus test kits from Germany, China, WHO, etc, and fail to produce a valid test kit themselves. The result was that during January and February, US cases could not be reliably identified, and for several months thereafter insufficient and unreliable test kits made it impossible to track the epidemic and stop the spread.
• 22. You have trusted medical spokesmen lie to the public about the pandemic’s severity, so precautions weren’t taken when they might have been more effective and less long-lasting.
• Dr. Fauci told USA Today on February 17 that Americans should worry more about the flu than about coronavirus, the danger of which was “just miniscule.” Then on February 28, Drs. Fauci and Robert Redfield (CDC Director) wrote in the New England Journal:
  • “…the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”
• 23. You destroy the reputation of physicians with credibility who stand in your way

Quote from LeBob

There is a possibility that short range electromagnetic bonds between protons deuterons and the unstable actinides nuclei could stabalise them or accelerate the decay proccess.

There is a possibilty that protons inside zircons cause heating in magmas

zircons contain high concentrations of uranium/thorium and metastable hafnium and ytterbium with low eV magnetic states

however it is complete speculation whether the excess heating is fusion or fission or exists at all..

at any rate magma is not 'close to your home'

https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/21476770

https://pdfslide.net/engineeri…-thorium-from-zircon.html

Quote from RobertBryant

Dr Been's advice is still fairly current.. 500-1000 mg daily...

Quercetin

One could try two 500 mg per day..

read the label first..

It does not appear to interfere with warfarin

there is some evidence for other benefits.. atherosclerosis.. hypertension.. no RCT's

http://pennstatehershey.adam.c…tid=107&pid=33&gid=000322

but remember that zinc is needed for the ionophore action

Quote from THHuxleynew

remain mistified how so many people here (including you) can be so unable to look without prejudice at data and join the dots

"without prejudice... join the dots"

More THH rhetoric... irrelevant as usual..no back up

'I'm just glad I don't do that."

So how come THH characterises Raoult and Zelensky as saying 'outstanding cure" and " magic bullet"

when NOONE has said that....

Let's all play join the dots in THH mystery play school...

Quote from stefan

Well, it is silly to say that HCQ is hindered by liberals.

'hindered by liberals: ? Not in Sweden... Sweden has more reserved silliness than in E pluribus Democraticum

https://www.statnews.com/2020/…e-congress-campaign-2020/

However the word 'liberal' applied to the Democrats is done so liberally at least wrt Trump+HCQ

Quote from THHuxleynew

It is not good politics to change your mind every day.

Who s changing your mind every day???

THH rhetoric never ceases.its outstanding irrelevance

Quote from Bob#2

f I can find valid "for human use" Ivermectin,

You might have to settle for quercetin as a substirute for HCQ..

Ivermectin will probably be locked up like HCQ.. and in very short supply very soon

Dr Been's advice is still fairly current.. 500-1000 mg daily...

His Vit D3 advice is not quite right... you don't need sunlight to activate it.

Quote from RobertBryant

More THH rhetoric

More THH Rhetoric,..

Did Raoult say outstanding!!

or "magic bullet"

There is Dr THH spin... the circuit designer and the one who finds Dr Ascoli's statisitcs "convincing"

This is the current view from India

"HCQ is obviously not a panacea for severe cases of Covid-19. Given early, it helps reduce mortality by about half, compared to those not given HCQ

. In India the drug is widely available and not expensive. A number of Indian states have already incorporated a short course of HCQ in their Covid-19 treatment protocol, and states that have not done so will do well to implement this quickly.

Quote from THHuxleynew

The claims of outstanding success using HCQ are very suspect.

More THH rhetoric

Quote from Zeus46

They say that due to the long half-life, rheumatism patients build up similar blood concentrations as were tested in the RECOVERY trial.

One benefit of this high dosing is that it shows that the TOXICITY of HCQ is low... it is NOT a dangerous drug..

Here is dangerous,.. opioids... insulin... warfarin ...aspirin .. HCQ is not on the list..

https://www.ismp-canada.org/do…ationIncidents.pdf?id=303

"

We did not observe excess mortality in the first 2 days of treatment with
hydroxychloroquine, the time when early effects of dose-dependent toxicity might be expected.
urthermore, the preliminary data presented here did not show any excess in ventricular
tachycardia (including torsade de pointes) or ventricular fibrillation in the hydroxychloroquine arm.

the main problem wih the WRECKOVERY arm of The RECOVERY 'trial' was that HCQ was not given early within 5 days of first symptoms..

The news from Mumbai and Vellore... unbiased..

" The Detroit study has swung the pendulum all the way back, favourable to HCQ use in Covid-19.

If the scientific evidence from France was for reduction of viral load in the upper respiratory tract,

was it not likely that it reflected a reduction of viral load in all other infected body tissues also?

When should the viral load be reduced – late in the course of disease or early

Does it not make sense to use the drug early and not late?

"

The Detroit study on Covid-19 patients aged 18 to 76,

the majority with co-morbidities, was protocol-driven.

In one group a short course of HCQ was started early, preferably on the first or latest second day of hospitalisation.

In order to avoid serious side effects, the drug regimen was short – 400 mg twice on day one,

followed by 200 mg twice daily for four more days.

Corticosteroids were used as adjunct therapy in a proportion of patients in both groups.

The in-hospital mortality for Covid-19 was 26.4 per cent in those not given HCQ, reduced to 13.5 per cent in the HCQ-treated group.

https://indianexpress.com/arti…vid-19-treatment-6504276/

Of course there is Surgisphere... which is indeed 'statistical fraud'

but that is Surgisphere

happening in a realm far from Surgery , inpatients and outpatients

which managed to fool both NEJM and Lancet

The fraudulent Surgisphere studies make interesting reading but they are a galaxy away from

d the informed experience of physicians at the Covid-face of the efficacy of Ivermectin or any medicine.

Why couldnt NEJM or Lancet pick up Surgisphere fraud like inventing 600 or more patients as Dr Chaccour did in Spain?.

http://factor.prodavinci.com/l…doctorchaccour/index.html