Posts by RobertBryant

Quote from JedRothwell

He could not have missed the Clean Planet presentation at ICCF24.

But he may have missed the blank space on the CP website which AF was concerned about.

Quote from Paradigmnoia

to seal to low Torr also?

I'm sure the Oring leaked

high T + vacuum is tricky..

but leaked probably slow enough to get some info..

Mica absorbs most gamma

a beryllium window lets much more through

but costs $.. of course

Me356-say

" We measure Alpha, Beta & Gamma, Gamma, Neutrons, each has its own counter and/or scintilator."

Sounds like Thomas spent a few Koruna

Quote from Paradigmnoia

Now I doubt the 350 W completion

Waiting for the paint to dry... as at ITER,,

I doubt whether Iwamura checks the Clean Planet website... its probably not very important for his work,, more of a window dressing

Quote from Alan Smith

So not at 400C then.

Maybe just at 400C with silicone?

Advanced Green Septa, 11mm - Rated to 400C- Silicone Rubber

The Advanced Green septum was created to combine significantlylonger injection life, low bleed and low injection port adhesion.The result is a general use…

www.thomassci.com

Quote from Alan Smith

There can be sub 100keV gammas too.

depending on the metal atoms present

eg Pd105 38.720 keV , Sm151 25.710 keV,,

Thanks Thomas

Sounds great

Best of luck with "to be determined"

For ICCF25...?

"What was achieved?
COP 2 at 40W input power – internal temperature around 400°C
COP 2+ at higher temperatures – to be determined
Deuterium 99,8% from LindeGas was used
Results were repeatedly replicated"

Quote from Cydonia

with nickel maintly by beta decay.

which isotope>>?

Ni63 ?Beta decay 17.425 keV

a bit hard to pick up... just below a noisy gamma region..

~20- 80kev ,,according to gamma results

maybe something to look for

alpha beta gamma ..

next time

next $15,000..100,000..

Quote from Curbina

What requires a heat input is the difussion of the H through the metals, even if you add pressure, at room temp the difussion is too slow.

That is an interesting statement

I note that for a Nickel alloy the Activation energy for

interstitial dislocations etc is 0.17 ev..

"Evaluation of hydrogen diffusion and trapping in nickel Alloy 625..."

which equates to 1972K (Boltzman)

but even at 600K there should still be some hydrogens with 0.17eV

I think the point of the lowering of the T( that stimulates heatbursts )is that

the interruption or slowing of the flow somehow tangles up the flowing H's

so they "interact'in a close nuclear way..

with each other? with a metal atom?

airy fairy speculation is cheap

the experimentation is not..

but its much cheaper

than hot fusion

by a few billion $...and less dangerous

Quote from Paradigmnoia

What do hot fusion, cold fusion, and ecats have in common?

cats? hot cool and e?

Quote from Cydonia

For example Iwamura plays seemingly with a delta T.

Even for Iwamura

the heatburst evidence is called " Circumstantial NuclearEvidence"

based on the heat per H being >> than chemical energy

maybe something lost in translation????..

(there was no nuclear info..)

If Nickel nucleus

is involved the most likely gamma is 67 kev, Ni61

according to Wyttenbach

but the 67 Kev gamma is difficult to measure.,,

some experimental expertise is necessary,,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359023495_Latest_Progress_in_Research_on_AHE_and_Circumstantial_NuclearEvidence_by_Interaction_of_Nano-Metal_and_HD-Gas

Quote from Shane D.

The latest was Collis who tried

The ISCMNS is a kind of a community... loosely..

Collis 2018//14 2018/03/14

https://www.coldfusionnow.org/podcast/Ruby-Carat-William-Collis-Cold-Fusion-Now-006.mp3

" excess heat focus is ignoring the science"

"no consensus about what nuclear reactions going on"

"most models so far contravene conventional physics understanding;"

"no measurement of Hydrogen consumed";

Seems to be a lot of work to do... most of the minimal funding so far goes to building reactors and

calorimetry..to demonstrate xs heat.

Recent research appears to measure the hydrogen consumed... Mastromatteo 2022..

Takahashi/Iwamura continuing..

Some gamma measurement George,.Wyttenbach 2018(2022)

Quote from JedRothwell

I think Hagelstein and others would say their theories

Quote from alexhesnen

Can anyone here point to a fundamental LENR theory

Alex

There is no fundamental theory discussed at large by "the community".

The'community' of LENR is a fiction.

Currently leading researchers...like Iwamura, Mizuno;Takahashi,Celani, Storms, and the newer clean HME

is a very disparate group..

Luckily it is so disparate that there is little groupthink

unlike the CERN centred group of particle physicists..

How the 20 Mevs packets or so of fusion energy delta in deuterium/1-H going to helium

appears as heat( <0,05 Ev packet) level without neutrons, and only weak gamma footprint(sometimes)

cannot be understood via the conventional group think collision physics.

There is no fundamental theory which explains this apart from one that is not widely known

and at a formative stage.

There is Takahashi's decades old TSC..theory,but it is not discussed as far as I now within the very small Japanese LENR group..of which he is an elder statesman.

In addition it does not address the 20MEv >>>>.0.05 EV matter

Perhaps some have communicated privately to Takahashi senpai

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Akito-Takahashi-2

He has a hard time proving it either right or wrong with his current set of results which

are mainly picking up just excess heat information... not much gamma..

Maybe you have an opinion on TSC?

Storms's NAE site is not a fundamental theory...it is a pragmatic chemistry type explanation.

Hagelsteins phonon theory explains a bit how kev gamma level packages can appear as lower energy phonons// Maybe it is half right but the 20Mev transition?down to Kev packet level is unexplained..

Off the top of my head..sorry

Quote from RobertBryant

think in 6D

Unzicker is just starting with SO(4) ..since 2021

in Portugal

he used to be an SM follower..then found S3

he must have seen the light

or a quaternion

maybe he can think in 6D now..better than me

Quote from Edo

When we on the other hand destroy the deuteron, we have to input of that amount of energy.

Edo,, Can you elaborate on that? the deuteron is fairly stable..perhaps God 'destroys'

Do you mean when 2 deuterons fuse to become a helium atom..

I agree with your ~1.442 Mev as the ppe delta for the deuteron

Your contention that helium forms from 4 protons and 2e ? rather than 2n2p

and that the free neutron is not involved.I agree with..

the following excerpt from SO(4) is instructive,

presumably 3He from pp(pe)

I guess we can think of the 'neutron' as a 'proton -electron' construct' (pe)

with a 'charge' of some sort, Unlike Wyttenbach I cannot think in 6D..:) 4D gives me a headache,

I

I think you are trying to make a bonding schema that predicts energies and structures for the

Periodic Table,,, a noble cause. It depends on what accuracy you want.. The SO(4) modelling

is lots of work for lots of PhD students/researchers..for decades..

but it seems to be a lot more accurate than QED/QCD or any empirical method

the particular modelling here for C12 is 240eV accurate..out of 11.18Mevs..

But the most important thing for the planet right now is LENR,,. not C12,,

Quote from Curbina

the field of Hot Fusion.

Hot fusion by collision is the Neanderthal nutcracker suite

BGM for the SM church..plenty of $ during the offering time but utter silence in results

Here is Unzicker,, it appears that the church is under concerted attack in Germany

a new Reformation..?????

There are a lot of heretics around

1 comment

"As an undergraduate in the late 1980s I remember being asked to accept without argument

the findings of a HEP graph where the error bars were bigger than the axies, talk about a noise in data!

High Energy Physics lost all glamour for me then and I pursued interests in Solid State instead...

Thanks for all you do."

Quote from Wyttenbach

the most broad/deep cheating attempt ever made by the SM church.

the proposed new Neanderthal nutcracker in Geneva is more expensive.than anything from

the QED/QCD historical blunder so far

Here Sabine get's angry...in a controlled way..

"

All these predictions from particle physicists were wrong.

There is no shame in being wrong.

Being wrong is essential for science.

But what is shameful is that none of these people ever told us

what they learned from being wrong.

They did not revise their methods for making predictions for new particles.

They still use the same methods that have not worked for decades.

Neither did they do anything about the evident group-think in their community.

But they still want more money.

The tragedy is

I actually like most of these particle physicists.

They are smart and enthusiastic about science and for the most part

they’re really nice people.

But look, they refuse to learn from evidence. And someone has to point it out:

The evidence clearly says their methods are not working.

Particle physicists, of course, are entirely ignoring my criticism and

instead call me “anti-science”.

Let that sink in for a moment. They call me “anti-science”

because I say we should think about where to best invest science funding,

.. if you do a risk-benefit assessment it is clear that building a bigger collider

is not currently a good investment. It is both high risk and low benefit.

We would be better off if we'd instead invest in the foundations of quantum mechanics and astroparticle physics.

They call me “anti-science” because I ask scientists to think.

You can’t make up this shit.

Frankly, the way that particle physicists behave makes me feel

embarrassed I ever had anything to do with their field.."

2.2 megaelectron volts (MeV)

sounds pretty hot to me,

https://www.colby.edu/chemistry/PChem/Hartree.html

25 biilion K

Edo,

I noticed that apart from binding energies you a have as a goal

Modelling gamma energies

As you probably know a brief search of the 'standard' wisdom

yields just empirical correlations..wishy washy stuff

it seems that 20C quantum mechanics fails to model anything with less than a 300,000 eV error

whereas gamma spectra yield results which are much more accurate

example Li7..the 477.612 line which appears to be with an error of 1 eV

Gamma spectra are relevant to LENR because the gamma 'jumps' or energy packages of that size may be intermediates from the large 20 Mev delta down to emitted packets of energy in the infrared level... 0.2 ev (6 microns, 300C) and less.

You may be aware that SO(4) provides a more accurate means of modelling than empirical wishwash.

The Li6 first line calculation appears to have an error of only 3 EV.

.

Quote from Cherepanov2020

fatal delusions of Kanarev

Did Kanarev survive his ah.." fatal" delusions?

Yevtushenko..1961 Siberia

"The twentieth century has often fooled us.
We've been squeezed in by falsehood as by taxes.
The breath of life has denuded our ideas
as quickly as it strips a dandelion."

Probably this applies to 20C Quantum Mechanics

but we are almost a quarter of the way through a new century..

the dandelion blooms again soon

Does the iconoclast of Maxwell thru to Kanarev,

Cherepanov, build something new. a blooming dandelion

.. a new model of the electron.?

Perhaps this can be continued on another thread.the iconoclast one.....

Quote from Cherepanov2020

It seems to me that we do not understand each other ..

an understatement.....

"My task on this site is for each of you to accustom yourself to the idea that any of us can be wrong,

that the great physicists from whom we studied physics were also wrong" Cherepanov 2020..

Question 1.

Does any of us include " I - Aleksey Ivanovich Cherepanov" ?

Question 2?

Did you actually look at Unzicker's QED ... or is youtube banned where you are,

like #Kherson is banned?

It appears that at least three Nobel prize winners

Tominaga, Feynman, Schwinger were indeed "wrong"

With regards to Dr Kanarev from the Kuban... .. God Bless Him

I quite like his torus model of the electron..

Question 3,4

Did you, manage to calculate the magnetic moment of the Kanarev electron?

Did it correspond with the measured value?

−9.2847647043(28)×10⁻²⁴ J⋅T⁻¹.

http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V07NO3PDF/V07N3kan.PDF