to the question is the neutron actually lighter than the proton?
QCD has an answer ...maybe
... +_55 Mev..
to the question is the neutron actually lighter than the proton?
QCD has an answer ...maybe
... +_55 Mev..
Maxwells equations valid for the 3-sphere
https://arxiv.org/ftp/math/papers/0510/0510388.pdf
Maybe they are valid and useful for solar plasmas... protons..
And they are all top-class scientists (though of course they are mentally defective because they work/worked on LENR)
I went to one of the top 6(7) universities in the world..
there were plenty of clever idiots who went there who didn't work on LENR..
The theory is not very useful in calculating anything accurate for particle masses
A recent QCD paper writes..
"
“Applying this weighted averaging procedure to the ground-state energy E0 of the two-point function yields the result for the nucleon mass that agrees well with the physical value,
E0 = 0.565(24)(8)a −1 = 977(42)(13) MeV”
QCD renormalisation gobbledegook 'agrees well" so its not necessary
to worry about distinguishing a neutron or a proton
Just call them both nucleons..
QCD NUCLEON 977 +- 55 Mev
physical value PROTON 939.565413 Mev
NEUTRON 938.272088 Mev
What's a few 55 Mevs? among friends and a bunch of Phd's Profs Nobel prize winners?
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.07519.pdf
to the question is the neutron actually lighter than the proton?
QCD has an answer ...maybe
... +_55 Mev..a nonsense answer
Offering the standard wikipedia wisdom
Sabine used to be a thinking physicist... but now she is rather trite..
Has a few jokes though..
“Understanding the strong nuclear force in LHC collisions is quite simple, by which
I mean a PhD in particle physics will do.
If we erase the names of everyone we consider barbaric from centuries ago
The publicity about Huxley's racism apparently didn't reach James Watson in time..
Perhaps James Watson took his ethnological folly to heart
The Seattle people are not erasing the name of " everyone" everywhere
just Huxley off a building for students..
after all he never asked his name to be on it..
where he is I don't think he cares
Maybe they appeal to the commoners?
Definitely Rothwell presents the implications for the common(American) household very well
and Egely is an excellent presenter with a well prepared presentation
what does all this have to do with Putin or Russia?!
its about the persona rather than LENR...or saving the planet..don't feed the persona
hours and hours of video
There's about 90 videos in all..at
The two most popular by far in terms of views are below
Egely 1507 views and Rothwell 1524
Maybe they appeal to the commoners?
. I'm looking at your images but I don't understand it yet.
Its taking me a while... they're not mine..
but they are easier to understand than QCD, QED goobledegook
when you include time.
AFAIK 'time' is not included.. as a dimension.
x,y and u,v are spatial dimensions
..electrons and protons exist in timelessness,,
LENR Forum has become a waste of time
Twitter has a word limit....= less word salad..
.lets move with #ElonMusk?
Why is the #ICCF24 tag so anemic?
feed a trol
A different menu
the Canadian"Decouple" is very relevant to #ICCF24 ...the climate vs nuclear angle
I contacted another Robert about #ICCF24
saving the planet..
inter alia
People are complicated.
Time will tell
Somewhere in Seattle
People are complicated too
But I think the state of Washington will remain for some time..
"
Further Information: Laura Wagner and Francis Neff are the senators for the College of the Environment at Western and are working hard to get students involved with the Huxley College of the Environment name change. The senators plan to hold a public forum with students about Thomas Huxley and the name change on Monday, Jan. 25 from 6-7 p.m. If you want to get involved with the movement and follow their other term goals, their joint Instagram account is @collegeofenvironment.senators and their email is [email protected].
this line
" H1 + H1 = (neutron + proton + electron) + 1.442 (MeV)"
Are you saying that if two hydrogen atoms were to form a deuterium
the net energy released should be 1.442 Mev?
which is a combination of the mass defect from the effect of n-p-e bondingin deuterium(2.225Mev
and the excess energy of the neutron (0.78?) ...)0.783 ? relative to p-e?
this sounds reasonable...
but to say that deuterium forms from ( p+e) +(p+e)
and that the mass defect should be the same as the net energy released by comparing against 2p+2e
goes against convention
the convention sort of says that deuterium is formed by n+(p+e)
and the mass defect is by comparing against (n+p+e)..
"The deuterium would have been formed in the first 1,000 seconds after the big bang, when the rapidly expanding universe had cooled off just enough to allow protons and neutrons to combine..
But conventions can be wrong
The only conclusion in my mind is that there is no neutron as a fundamental particle.
The neutron is unstable as shown by its excess energy.. it does not exist as a free neutron very long outside the nucleus and probably does not exist inside the nucleus as circles depicted in simplistic 2D pictures..it is a 4D particle,,,bonding in 3D/4D,.. welcome to 4D/6D headaches,...
Top 6 Universities
Maybe number 7.. depends on what scale one chooses.
MIT=No 1 on QS scale.2022.
MIT of the 1989 "averaging over 1 hr test"
but Hagelstein is there.. I hope his status is elevating...too
Granted, it can be easier to develop an experiment based on theory,
It can be very expensive
and the theory can always be wrong..
What's the hurry?
LENR is moving faster
North Notts won't happen before ICCF25
twitter October 4,, "Getting Britain moving.
but nice try.
Perhaps a candidate to ask about ICCF24... or Bob Cywinski
and a few others of the staunch old school
I'll try
the tritium result might be a good lead..
I'm jealous .. Cafe Scientifique not very much physics and very rare in Australia
but even in the UK the cafe has lost its nuclear flavor?