Wyttenbach Verified User
  • Male
  • from Switzerland
  • Member since Jan 15th 2016
  • Last Activity:

Posts by Wyttenbach

    Highlights

    From paper:: . Finally, we find that there are 27 times as many reports for COVID-19 vaccines as would be expected if its adverse reactions were comparable to those from the flu vaccine.


    Table 1 lists a number of symptoms in VAERS that can be associated with inflammation of or damage to various major nerves of the body,
    particularly those in the head. Strikingly,
    COVID-19 vaccines represented from 96 to 98% of the reports in the year 2021 related to each of these debilitating conditions. There were nearly 100,000 cases of nausea
    or vomiting, which are common symptoms of vagus nerve stimulation or damage (Babic and Browning, 2014). 14,701 cases of syncope linked to COVID-19 vaccines represented 96.3% of all cases of syncope, a
    well-established feature of vagus nerve dysfunction (Fenton et al.,2000).

    Pfizer crap "vaccine" : https://jamanetwork.com/journa…08-43a5-ab1f-c9608a26d112


    At least for seniors...


    Compared with the mRNA-1273 group, the BNT162b2 group had an excess per 10 000 persons of 10.9 events (95% CI, 1.9-17.4 events) of ischemic stroke, 14.8 events (95% CI, 7.9-21.8 events) of myocardial infarction, 11.3 events (95% CI, 3.4-17.7 events) of other thromboembolic events, and 17.1 events (95% CI, 8.8-30.2 events) of kidney injury. Estimates were largely similar among subgroups defined by age (<40, 40-69, and ≥70 years) and race (Black, White), but there were higher magnitudes of risk differences of ischemic stroke among older persons and White persons, kidney injury among older persons, and other thromboembolic events among Black persons.

    I don't think you understand any of the observational lab-testing they have made,

    If you have no physics background you should no discuss about things you don't understand.


    Mills isolation of H*-H* is a great achievement but has nothing to do with his Hydrino fake model.

    Hmm, what do you think about the importance of non radiating charge distributions?

    SO(4) physics shows that charge is a topological effect of nested EM flux. So what Mills shows is just a mathematical conclusion for the equivalence radius. At certain radii there are no radial forces hence no radiation = "flux is on a stable - harmonic - orbit".


    Hauss (Mills Mentor) found the the non radiation condition under a military contract for the X-ray laser. For external quantities you can always find classical explanation that in some respect agree with SO(4) physics.


    E.g. the photon equation is basically violating Maxwell equations as E/B are not symmetric generators. But as a projection from SO(4) it works for some aspects of photon behavior.


    Mathematicians chronically forget that the induction law does not work point wise...and flux charge never stay at the same place...

    My stance is that GUTCP and QM is much closer related than basically everybody else think and that contemplating plurality leads to some aha's for you and also gives a warning to trust QM too much.

    There is no difference between GUT_CP and QM except the explanations and the basic methods used.


    Both models suffer from the same wrong explanation- crossing current loops .. and finally can only deliver approximate solutions.


    But Mills treatment of magnetic mass/energy can help to find very good explanations for basic physics. In fact if you use some additional steps you can find an exact equation for the fine structure frequency. Of course Mills formula fails for Deuterium without deeper modelling...


    But his idea of Hydrinos is one of the most dumb ideas in physics history as he invents ad hoc charge generation (photon becomes charge or charge like force - what ever this means..)...to solve a logical problem...

    Of course there is no serious math behind hydrinos either as even the most simple thing - the relativistic effects - are not treated.

    They are only good for baseline generation. The solution is not to build too many nukes. They are now 20% of U.S. capacity. Given nighttime demand I suppose 30% would be okay.

    My house had on of the 3000 10kW night current heatings used to "burn" down excess nuke current.

    Now where almost everybody here has a ground probe and a heat pump we can make better use of this current. People are now obliged to removed them until 2025 some latest 2030.

    This thinking requires ignoring both physics and economics. The value of solar and wind decline in economic value as they become larger shares of the electricity grid for physical reasons. They produce too much energy when societies don’t need it and not enough energy when they do.

    Solar is most efficient if its local. So the USA has to force all owner of large city roofs and all owners that run air-condition to install solar panels. Even brickheads understand that sun maxima are correlated with max energy from panels needed at the same time as air condition is needed...

    Large solar farms are not a very clever idea if they are off grid or to far north... as in Germany...


    But in the south Solar allows you to go off grid what gives you an optimal cost/benefit ratio.


    Statistics done the Forbes/troll way are just opinion making with no serious background.

    where infections first spread during late 2019."

    This is fake info. The virus got first release already in April 2019 as we know from the Italy samples. But it failed to generate a pandemic. I believe the second (may the forth in reality) intentional placement was far more elaborate and widespread. This happened in early August 2019 - 6 weeks before the first official case was seen...


    This is known from hospital parking lot data and and road blocking that has been collected by intelligence services.


    In my view it can't be an accident. It was professional planting.

    All primary energy has losses. E.g. Shipping oil --> to cars gasoline involves up to 50% losses if you count in all production/transportation costs.

    Overall electricity has the least losses despite these can also grow up to 30% depending on mix.


    The big difference is:: Wind produces almost environmental damage same for Hydro or solar after the production of the generation units. Cars always produce micro particles from the tires/road or noise from tires, cabin. So here nothing changes.

    UK infection rate up by around 50% over the last two weeks, now at close to 1.5M cases.

    The Pfizer marketing is active everywhere. Nobody wants to use their crap without serious fears of worse fates...


    USA wants to damage all children with gene therapy:: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2…accinating-young-children


    Remember that about 20x more children will die from the "fake vaccine" than from CoV-19. Not counting the some 10'000 live long damaged ones.