Wow - wasn't it Parkomov who filled in the data gaps in his "replication" with his own interpretation of what might have been?
Isn't it Parkomov who has not been able to successfully replicate when outsiders are in the lab as witnesses?
And how did Piantelli get left out of this conversation as the father of Ni/H2 anomalies?
Having asked these questions - I do wish Parkomov the best moving forward. He seems to be better resourced these days and I'm hopeful that some of his work can be successfully verified.