Unzicker is more charming
and he has a cute Bavarian accent
And he understands math and physics. And he doesn't try to project that he knows everything while being completely unqualified while spouting buzzwords.
PhysicsForDummies
Verified User
- Male
- 60
- from San Diego CA USA
- Member since Jan 8th 2018
- Last Activity:
- Portal
Posts by PhysicsForDummies
-
-
"The pot calling the kettle black"
I never once pontificated about any personal "theories".
I just point out crackpot posts that are not theories.
A theory must involve math.
If there is no math, only buzzwords, there is no theory.
-
When I researched particle physics in an undergrad independent lab in the 80's, I was under the impression at the time that everyone understood that quarks themselves might not exist.
It is just that they were a valuable building block to construct the known particles at the time. Did these get elevated to "real" particles?
I thought the big problem with the quark model is that it can't explain the mass, requiring the ridiculous "quark soup" non-sense.
-
I have been attempting to falsify the fusion theory of LENR in order to raise LENR from pseudoscience to science.
It is impossible to falsify anything by spewing buzzwords and made up crackpottery.
-
In the words of Lloyd Christmas, "So you're saying there's a chance!"
Is LK-99 a Superconductor After All? New Research and Updated Patent Say So (yahoo.com)
-
.
In your example you are averaging two uncorrelated parameters.
And he's averaging parameters with different units. Kind of like averaging velocity and acceleration.
-
I heard Pine Demon and thought of Jersery Devil. Being from Philly, we heard more than a few scary stories about being in the Pine Barrens late at night!
I grew up on the outskirts of the pine barrens in South Jersey.
-
What I can prove is irrelevant. Both you and your associates will undoubtedly experience these characteristics of the reaction because they will assuredly occur. If you don't recognize them for what they are, you'll will just be confused and spend years trying to overcome them if at all.
It must feel awesome to be the all knowing expert on everything, watching all the confused idiots who do real experiments foolishly failing. It is like a demigod looking down with derision on his flawed creations.
-
From the above quote:-
(this should be taken as a fact which we will not prove)
That is not science, not physics, but pure bluster. Faraday would have died from embarrassment.
Isn't that statement the epitome of a religious dogma, that we must take this on faith?
That statement is not as much bluster as religion.
-
-
It is incredible how people read something on Wikipedia, and it suddenly becomes the most important topic in the universe, and is automatically tied to the EVO, of course. Latest fascination: the magical "Electroweak Force" which only existed unified at over 10^15 degrees K, yet somehow exists in everyday EVO's. Is the electroweak force more important than the Higgs field? Does it generate "hexagonal fields"? Does electroweak force generate chiral polaritons which was a previous most important topic?
I wish theorists here would start updating Wikipedia with all the profound theories proposed here. I looked up Pine's Demon entry on Wikipedia only to find it never once mentions massless electrons or the fundamental tie to the existence of the universe as we know it.
-
Another "Pines demon" from where I grew up.
The Jersey Devil and Folklore - Protecting the New Jersey Pinelands and Pine Barrens | Pinelands Preservation AllianceThe New Jersey Pinelands is home to miles of pine trees and sandy roads, but it is also home to New Jersey’s most infamous resident… The Jersey Devil.…pinelandsalliance.org -
Just imagine I am 5 years old. See if you can explain that sentence to me.
Better yet, explain the theory with math, not buzzwords.
-
If it fully levitates, it's a sc, or at least that is how I understand it.
Superconducting frog, I guess:
-
IMO copper sulphide shouldn't be present in material at all: in my theory superconductivity would require presence of highly oxidized lead/copper atoms (which attract and concentrate electrons along their lines) - and sulphide ions would reduce them. So that once you have copper sulphide presented in the sample, it just means that it can not be a superconductor. Cuprate superconductors require long time annealing in oxygen atmosphere during last stage of their preparation. Under such a conditions all traces of sulphide anions would be destroyed.
Not sure of your point. Is your point that the LK-99 is a superconductor according to your theory, or is it not?
-
Display More
The hypothesis that informs the ENG8 technology is that the EVO termination is the energy production mechanism that generates the release of energetic electrons open termination. In light of this posit, to optimize energy production, it is important to understand how EVOs are created and energized so that their optimized production can optimize electron generation.
According to nanoplasmonic theory, a polariton condensate can form in at least two ways. It can form on the surface of a metal substrate and is optimized when that surface is cracked and pitted in order to produce quantum voids so that electrons and photons can be made entangled, but in this case, the condensate is affixed to the surface of the substrate but the motion of the condensate is limited to its location of creation. Or the condensate can form on the surface of a metal nanoparticle when both electrons and photons are abundant in the ambient environment.
Spark produced electrons, photons, and metal nanoparticles are optimized to allows EVOs to be produced in optimized amounts to support gainful energy production when they terminate. The design of the reaction becomes an exercise in nanoparticle optimization as follows:
Spark discharge synthesis is a simple and versatile method for producing nanoparticles and associated EVOs. The process uses only gas, electrodes, and electricity. The spark produces an aerosol of pure particles from two ablated metals, which are then transferred to a downstream plasma. The resulting nanoparticles are made of pure metal, and no post-processing steps such as drying or surfactant decomposition is required.
Spark discharge synthesis is carried out in a pure gas atmosphere that protects the nanoparticles from contamination. The method is also environmentally friendly because it does not use precursors.
The composition of the nanoparticles generated by spark ablation depends on several factors, most notably on the properties of the electrode material, the initial polarity of the electrodes, and the electrical characteristics of the discharge circuit.
Here are some production parameters that affect optimized nanoparticle production in a plasma which may or may not be appropriate for EVO optimization:
Evaporation and condensation: A physical method that converts metals into nanopowders
Thermal plasma: An effective heat source for synthesizing nanoparticles
Silane-hydrogen plasmas: Used to synthesize silicon nano-crystals in the gas phase
PVP: Plays a role in controlling the size of nanoparticles, decreasing the speed of agglomeration, and improving the crystallinity of nanoparticles
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is a large polymer that can be used in nanoparticle production as a surface stabilizer, growth modifier, nanoparticle dispersant, and reducing agent. PVP can prevent particle aggregation and control the average particle size and shape. PVP molecules are not easily displaced by other molecules and offer excellent steric stability. PVP-coated particles are stable in a wide variety of polar solvents. The use of PVP would be a research project to metal nanoparticle optimization.
SEE: https://nanocomposix.com/pages…lent%20steric%20stability.
.
Spherical metal nanoparticles: Have a great impact on the additive manufacturing industry
Once the nanoparticles and associated EVOs are generated, they may now be brought to a state of growth and subsequent instability by applying EMF such as RF or microwaves in the plasma.
PVPPVP
Spoken as a true expert. The greatest physicist of our time without any formal training.
-
I’m starting to doubt Rossi is coming back to America ever again…
He might face extradition at some point.
-
I think it is going to be worth the wait.
-
Stuffing the seats with AAA batteries takes time.
So does adding the toggle switch which Rossi will flip right before the battery is tested by the certificators.
-
Display More
Comment from ECatWorld.
mailin14 hours ago edited"there are voluminous numbers of unscrupulous people who do not want to see him succeed"
Such remarks are conspiracy theories. Businesses are desperate to see new energy solutions arise as these will open new markets and product developments, even to current energy players.
"I personally believe that there is no chance that Andrea Rossi would be arranging for a demonstration of an E-Cat-powered electric vehicle if he had any doubt at all that it would not work reliably."
Sadly, over the past 10 years, Rossi has presented one flaky demo after the other without any rigorous science to backup his claims. His light source was perhaps the most embarrassing one of all as he showed to the community his lack of knowledge about luminous flux, confusing the notions of energy and power.
Rossi needs to realize that he will not be able to fool another investor into some half backed science project, but he will need to pull out some solid demonstration to convince the community. With the claims he is making, such demonstration would be very easy to realize and without disclosing any technical data. I just hope he gets it right this time.
Sam rather than quoting someone else, tell us what you think? Do you think Rossi will wow the world and take home the Nobel prize? Here is my guess. A big flat flop with easily faked results, fake validators, fake measurements, no press coverage except ECW. This will quickly be followed by a new iteration of the E-cat that will be much better in a year or two.
