The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

Quote from Alan Smith

I think you should tell us how that is done so we can measure it.

The Higgs mechanism involves two quantum properties of particles: Weak Isospin and Weak hypercharge. These properties combine to produce charge. Weak Hypercharge produces mass. If the charge of a particle is reduced, the masking of the Weak hypercharge property is occurring. That means that charge masking and mass masking are directly related. Also Weak hypercharge masking will also produce some level of electroweak unification. If beta decay is accelerated or eliminated. then electroweak unification is underway. There has been LENR experiments that have shown that radioactive isotopes have accelerated radioactive decay. Of the top of my head two such experiments come to mind as follows:

Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6276

Accelerated alpha-decay of 232U isotope achieved by exposure of its aqueous solution with gold nanoparticles to laser radiation

A laser is used to excite gold nanoparticles into a LENR state.

and

Low-energy nuclear reactions and the leptonic monopole

Georges Lochak*, Leonid Urutskoev**

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf

A spark discharge is used to generate reduction of radioactive decay is U238 at a distance (shows electroweak/EMF unification) .

The connection between electroweak unification, charge masking (charge reduction) and Higgs field masking (mass reduction) is shown in this explanation of the electroweak and EMF connection.

Quote from RobertBryant

U238 decays via alpha...100%.. just like U234 U232.... not via beta..

maybe try U242 ???

The U238 decay chain

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sarah-Flanagan/publication/320504937/figure/fig1/AS:669444468641792@1536619407008/Uranium-238-radioactive-decay-series.png

There is lots of beta decay in that chain.

Quote from Wyttenbach

Why did they get a Nobel prize? Because particle physics today is a criminal mafia as the brainless can only survive if they support other brainless ideas.

What is behind all that hostility and rage?

Quote from RobertBryant

The alpha decay for U232.. U238 is the rate limiting step..in these chains

halflife for U238 is measured as 4.4 billion years..

of course there might be some LENR mechanism that accelerates alpha decay..

maybe on youtube

somewhere between handwaves...and the Higgs boson on the path to the MOE..

External Content www.youtube.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Display More

The neutron can decay, then there is the beta plus reaction that keeps the number of protons and neutrons in balance. If too many neutrons in the nucleus decay, the protons are converted to neutrons to keep the number of protons and neutrons in balance.

If neutron decay produces a overly excessive number of protons in the nucleus, that nucleus will become unstable whereby a alpha decay process will occur.

Alpha decay is a nuclear decay process where an unstable nucleus changes to another element by shooting out a particle composed of two protons and two neutrons. This ejected particle is known as an alpha particle and is simply a helium nucleus. Alpha particles have a relatively large mass and a positive charge.

In the https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6276 reference on U232 decay, the half-life of U232 is reduced from 69 years to 5 microseconds.

Quote

It is reasonable to suggest that the alpha-decay proceeds during the laser pulse, while the spontaneous decrease of alpha-activity during exposure is negligible. This means that the activity drops down by a factor of 2 during 5 us, which is the

total duration of all 150 ps laser pulses during exposure. In other words, the half-life of 232U in the laser field is 5 us instead of 69 years. About 10^10 nuclei of 232U decay during laser exposure.

My reaction to Egely's lecture on his LENR device as follows:

Egely has rightly identified the quasiparticle as the active agent in the LENR reaction. But the quasiparticle must form a Bose Einstein condensate before both the charge and the mass masking structure of the condensed plasmoid (EVO) is formed. Egely has identified the polariton as a possible candidate for the LENR active quasiparticle, but there are many more possible quasiparticle candidates that might be responsible.

The high voltage electrical explosions that produce the electron based output of Egely's devices is called a Bosenova which is the rapid destruction of the coherent condensate.

The Bosenova is the sole source of the electrical output of a gainful LENR device. Transmutation contributes nothing to the power production of the LENR reaction. As Dr Kim stated years ago, the energy produced by transmutation is masked by the coherent nature of the Bose condensate which generates transmutation while the Bose condensate is active, It is only at the point of destabilization of the EVO that energy is extracted from the EVO.

This lack of energy production by transmutation is seen in strange radiation where an EVO creates a trail of transmuted matter as it floats over a metal surface where no sign of heat deformation is apparent.

Quote

It is reasonable to expect that people just can't believe it. I understand that it is difficult to flush 30 years of LENR believe and theory down the toilet, but it must be done to get to the truth.

http://coldfusioncommunity.net…18/08/244_JCMNS-Vol24.pdf

Abstract

In the period 1978–2002, The Silcal Metallurgic Ltd., a Coimbatore (India) based company, was engaged in the production of ferro silicon alloy deploying a 12 MVA “Submerged Carbon Arc” powered smelter. During a 11-week long non-stop round the clock operation of the plant in 1995, daily feed of raw materials was: Quartz (33.4 ton), charcoal (with fixed carbon content of 13.2 ton) and scrap steel (5.1 ton) while the daily output production of Fe–Si alloy (73.5% Si) was 24.75 ton. From the total weights of Si and Fe in the input feed and assuming 100% recovery of the metals, the daily output alloy production could at best have been only 20.5 ton. However to our surprise throughout the 11-week period the total daily Fe–Si alloy (with 73.5% Si) output was consistently 24.75 ton, corresponding to a daily “anomalous” excess metal production of 4.25 ton of Fe–Si alloy. The only source of Si entering the smelter furnace was the quartz raw material and that of Fe was the scrap steel (except for minor additional amounts of Fe originating from the steel casing of the consumable Söderberg carbon electrodes). Very careful vigil of the weights of daily input feed of raw materials and output alloy drained out as also the electrical energy consumption was maintained. It was evident that roughly 20% more metal than could be accounted for from the input feed was being produced and consequently we have been obliged to come to the conclusion that anomalous quantities of Si (2.8 ton/day) and Fe (1.45 ton/day) were being synthesized during the smelting process. Discussions with researchers involved in the Cold Fusion/LENR field have suggested that a likely explanation for the anomalous metal production could be the occurrence of transmutation reactions between nuclei of C and the O stripped from the SiO2 during the chemical reduction process. It is speculated that the intense varying magnetic fields generated by the kilo-amp levels of alternating current (AC) driving the arcing between the three gigantic carbon electrodes and the carbonic hearth of the furnace, in the 2000◦C temperature environment, could have somehow catalyzed transmutation reactions to occur, very similar to the transmutations reported in laboratory scale “Carbon-Arc experiments” first revealed by George Oshawa in 1964. But the more puzzling aspect of our observations is that there was no evidence of release of the expected massive amounts of nuclear energy that should have accompanied the postulated transmutation reactions based on the atomic masses of the nuclei involved.

7. Puzzle of the Missing Nuclear Energy

A worth noting feature of the Silcal observations was that there was no dramatic change whatsoever in the energy dissipation. Using the estimated energy release values of 17.13 MeV/atom of Si or 49.58 MeV per atom of Fe given in Appendix B, for the postulated nuclear transmutation reactions, it can be shown that corresponding to 4.25 ton of metal transmutation, the power generated should have been the equivalent of the total thermal power generated by hundreds of 1000MWe nuclear power stations. However, in our plant there was no evidence of such massive amounts of nuclear energy being released throughout the 11-week period, giving a handle to the skeptics to question our claims of ton level elemental transmutations. In this context it is worth noting that nobody in published LENR literature (to the best of our knowledge) has established a clear correlation between the quantum of transmutation products generated in carbon arc and the expected nuclear heat release based on atomic mass considerations. On the other hand neither has any publication claimed that the Carbon Arc experiment violates Einstein’s E = mc2 dictum. Thus if indeed the Silcal transmutation claims are confirmed it would clearly point to the operation of new Science wherein transmutation could be occurring without the accompaniment of the expected nuclear energy release. In the context of these remarks the arguments of Daniel Szumski elaborated in his “Least Action Nuclear Process” (LANP) Theory appear relevant. We learnt about Szumski’s work through his paper presented at ICCF 20 conference [13]. Szumski who has taken great pains to analyze in detail the transmutation observations of George Miley (see http://www.LeastActionNuclearProcess.com) argues that both endothermic and exothermic nuclear reactions can and do occur concurrently in LENR experiments, partly or wholly cancelling out net energy release. In fact he has referred to some experimental observations of Mizuno wherein transmutations have reportedly been observed by him not accompanied by energy release. Szumski is thus not at all surprised by our observation of “energy neutral” transmutation reactions

Display More

Quote from RobertBryant

Catchy name...anything to do with the dance?

If there is no math,, maybe the beat is good.

Quasiparticles are particles that describe collective excitations in materials. They are not elementary particles, but they have similar properties, such as charge and spin. Quasiparticles can exhibit Bose–Einstein condensation, which is the fifth state of matter.

Bose–Einstein condensates (BECs) are a collective low-energy state of bosons. They can exist in ultracold atomic gases and at higher temperatures in materials with bosonic quasiparticles.

Researchers have created BECs from quasiparticles. They have also been able to shrink the condensate by manipulating magnetic fields. This causes a tiny explosion, similar to a microscopic supernova, which they call a "Bosenova".

Egely believes that the LENR reaction is centered on quasiparticles called polaritons, in this I agree.

Exciton-polaritons are quasi-particles that form as a result of interaction between excitons in extremely scaled quantum structures (cracks) and photons embedded in a highly confined optical cavity (cracks). Inside these cracks, light(photons) bounce around highly reflective metal walls until this light and Excitons (electrons) come into energy equilibrium. At this point, an Exciton-polariton is formed.

The characteristics of the cavity determines the confinement of the electromagnetic field and the number of particles involved in the process. When light and matter are in resonance (same energy), two polariton modes are formed: upper and lower polaritons.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a3a86403c1deab1605c805539b8f7a66d4410347f87ffa24dbed89d0dd92c49d.jpg

Polaritons have a special property (they are bosons) that allow condensation into a Bose condensate to occur. It is this condensate that we call an EVO. A properly configured hole or crack is a place where EVOs can preferentially form.