Posts by PhysicsForDummies

Quote from Toffoli

This is an interesting point that should be more deeply investigated

Before it is investigated I would like to understand what the point is. "Cheerleader patents" and AR ribs? Sounds like a high school barbeque party.

Quote from sam12

I think a negative result or third

party testing that is not legitimate

will effect me enough to finally

quit following Rossi.

Barty please ban me from

LENR Forum if this is the case.

Display More

I bet once you come to your senses and disavow Rossi, you will post about the same amount.

Very few quit "following" Rossi, they just follow in a different way, with a clearer mind.

It is just that we will need some new cult followers to replace you and Mark.

Maybe LENR forum can place ads on ECW.

Unbelievable! Rossi can't even multiply 10×10×10. He was corrected and still insists it is 100 instead of 1000. I thought the Celsius vs Kelvin calculation was bad enough. This guy is a complete moron.

1. Gerard McEk August 1, 2020 at 2:53 AM

   Dear Andrea,

   some questions if I may:

   1. Is the mentioned 100 cm^3 indeed the volume of the reactor or is it 1000 cm^3 (10x10x10 cm) being 1 liter?

   2. Based on your assumption that the Zero point energy may be used, there should be no ‘fuel’ (something that’s being used) needed. So the E-cat can run theoretically forever without refueling? Obviously I understand that some parts may deteriorate.

   3. Did’n even your wife witnessed the ECat in operation? (That’s something you can beat her with).

   4. What did you use to dissipate the electrical energy?

   Thank you, kind regards, Gerard

2. Andrea Rossi August 1, 2020 at 8:59 AM

   Gerard McEk:

   1. it is 100 cm^3; 10 x 10 x 10 was the former configuration, while 20 x 20 x 20 cm is the volume of the heat dissipator containing the reactor.

   2. we still need the charge

   3. he,he,he

   4. a resistance

   Warm Regards,

   A.R.

I was out golfing. Did I miss Alan's response about Rossi's 10000 solder joints?

Thanks.

Quote from Bob#2

"“Rossi-ma-Bob”" Hey! I take exception to this phrase!

His next even "higher energy density" version will be named "Rossi-ma-Bob#2".

Quote from Alan Smith

Your ignorance is showing badly. This is basic plasma physics.

Bob's retort is a fair question. What is your take on Rossi's claim of 10000 hand soldered connections in a 10 cm cube volume which also contains a plasma chamber? Or does Rossi just get a pass on this one (and other ones like his lawyers filings vs JONP statements)?

Quote from sam12

But would it not be better if you

ask him yourself.

Yes, it would. However I asked him about his lawyers statements that he is quarantined in Milan. He cursed me out, the blocked me from JONP, like anyone else who shows him facts.

This whole Rossi approach has given me a great new idea. So Rossi has a controller/power supply that runs the ecat, which generates electricity to run the power supply.

Suppose you took a motor, geared it to another motor shaft that acted like a generator, geared such that the second motor created more power than the first consumed? You would have to first briefly plug the first motor into the mains to get it kick started of course. You would need to cool these and the excess electrical power could be harvested, with perhaps 2 solder connections as opposed to 10000. I wonder if anyone on the internet has ever tried this?

(Before someone humor challenged starts lambasting me, yes this is sarcasm)

I will suspend disbelief for one moment and assume the SKL-HED exists at all (SKL Higher Energy Density).

So Rossi claims 4 kW power output (if you assume his 4kWh/h is just a stupid way of writing it).

Do you notice Rossi mentions the power to cool the "reactor" but not to run the external "control unit" which is so very, very complex. Are you sure this external power supply, er, control unit I mean, was running from electricity generated from the ecat? He is able to condition the ouput of the skl sufficiently to run this controller? For the qx test it was running off the mains, hence the moronic 1 ohm resistor/flip switching fiasco.

Perhaps his controller is like the one off the shelf version linked below, capable of 4 kW.

https://www.powerandtest.com/p…power-supplies/dlm-3-4-kw.

Sam, as our official conduit to Rossi, can you ask him if (he claims) this controller runs directly from power from the ecat, and not plugged into the mains? And even if it was running "closed loop" for some period, how much of that 4 kW was it using for that time? If it was around 4kW, that would make sense.

More appropriate for this news:

Quote from Mark U

Rossi says:

Obviously when this job will be made by robots it will be easier, but robots can be programmed only after a prototype model has been perfectioned; robots can reproduce an artificial intelligence as you teach them to make it:

Total BS. You don't show the robots a prototype model, then they look at it with their robot eyes and learn to make it with "AI", duplicating the errors in your prototype. You design it with CAD programs, then software can use those models, or you manually train the robots with a pendant. Rossi may have read somewhere about research into this, thought it sounded cool and knows he can fool his cult who don't understand what the buzzword AI really means. Sure some other BS company may claim something like this, but it doesn't mean it works. The whole field of AI has basically overpromised and under delivered, and I have basicically working in this field for 34 years. We called it "AI" back in the 80's, and that buzzword has had yet another resurgence. But now it is "Deep" learning. To match Rossi's "Deep BS".

Quote from sam12

1. Translate Andrea Rossi July 30, 2020 at 5:44 PM

   Sam:

   Yes, I am finishing the connections now, then go to sleep. The test will start in 5 hours and 17 minutes from now.

   Warm Regards,

   A.R.

Still thousands of connections to solder, then he will sleep less than 5 hours. Please don't let Andria oversleep. The world counts on him for it's survival!

Because he's the hero the world deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hunt him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a silent guardian. A watchful protector. A Dotore Knight.

Quote from axil

Aleksei Savchenko:

Thank you for your insight.

I think we must make a distinction between the R&D funded by the taxpayer for objectives purely scientific, whose projection in the timeframe for an industrial and profitable application is vague and undefined, and the R&D funded with private funds that for obvious reasons must reach a profitable product within a timeframe limited by financial issues. In the first case your insight is correct. In the second case, which is the one I am fighting through, your insight is not applicable. In fact:

1- the possibility of collaboration are limited by IP protection issues

2- the cash flow must necessary recover the expenses before the lack of money forbids to proceed

3- if you seat peacefully while your enemies try to destroy your work, you will be eliminated

I am telling this to you based on my personal bloody experience of half century of very, very hard work ( and life ). Unfortunately this is a war, a succession of battles: I cited two typical battles from a paradigmatic point of view, but this was only an example: obviously Waterloo for Russia and their allies has been a victory, while Austerlitz has been a defeat, we can change the points of view, but under a phylosophical point of view the issue is the same: competition is war and we have competition, whatever we do. The Ecat has been fought against from many sides from the first day it has been presented .

Here is another paradigmatic example of the first type, the type that fits with your insight: the ITER ( or Eater, if you want this concern has got billions and billions and billions of funds from the Taxpayer since the fifties and every 10 years they say that in the next 20 years or so we will have the nuclear fusion…everybody is happy, nobody fights against because everybody eats ( that’s why it has been dubbed Eater ), the Taxpayer has not the cultural preparation to understand that it will never work, the competition knows that it will never work, so everybody is happy, the IP is generously shared with everybody, because it will never make money, and the environment is perfect to be peaceful: why fight against a thing that will never work, but rains easy money from the Taxpayer on all the involved governments ? It is also the paradise of the managers there: no liabilities, no timeframes to show real results and a lot of publications that nobody reads, but are so intensely intelligent ! When they talk of it in the TV they say ludicrous things, like nuclear fusion is not dangerous because uses hydrogen and makes helium, both innocuous ( somebody could have thought that nuclear bombs are a bluff ). Nobody has the honesty to say that it is impossible to stabilize a magnetic field at a temperature over 100 millions K, and everybody is happy like an Easter.

On one point I totally agree with you: my citation of Waterloo as an example of defeat and of Austerlitz as an example of victory is stupid, because I forgot that what is a victory for one side is a defeat for the other side: this remark is as much intelligent from you, as it has been stupid for me not to get this point. So I make a correction, rephrasing as follows: I HOPE NEXT FRIDAY WILL BE A VICTORY, NOT A DEFEAT FOR OUR GREAT TEAM.

Warm Regards,

A.R.

Display More

AR forgot to add:

"Now excuse me while I straighten my Batman cape, and get back to soldering.

Only 99978 more connections to finish, and each of them are different, you know.

Plus my Researchgate "Full Read Ping Bot" has crashed. Got to restart that first. "

Quote from interested observer

There are countless devices that claim to revolutionize energy technology. It is reassuring that we don’t have to figure out if any of them actually work because, apparently, all of them do 😋

True, with one caveat. All of them work except those developed by Rossi.

A boss with no employees, and who doesn't pay you either? (I assume you aren't on his payroll)

The way to deal with that kind of boss is to walk out, being careful to LET the door hit you on the way out, file unemployment, report the minimum wage violation to the state, and call a sleazy attorney to sue his a$z.

Quote from Alan Smith

Take it easy with Sam. He's your main conduit to AR. And you know we are not fond of bullies here.

I said Sams question was intelligent, hence why he received the slammed door in the face by Rossi. Hardly bullying. Plus I can't think of any truthful information we have ever gotten from this conduit, can you? We have gotten humor though so I will miss that if Rossi cuts him off, which I expect unless Sam makes some kind of kiss-up post.

Quote from sam12

Rodney Nicholson:

Thank you for your synapsis: if I will fail with this experiment, I will turn to make rugs.

Warm Regards,

A.R.

This is how Rossi fashioned his own toupee, by hand soldering 10000 platinum sponge fibers to the lining

Sam, you do realize why this happened right? You questioned Rossi's honesty with common sense and intelligence. You are no longer part of his target audience, the most stupid or gullible. Hence the beatch slap. This is the well known Nigerian scam method. Congrats for graduating like many others like me before, from Idiotically believing this guy was for real 🤗👌

Gosh darnit. Rossi just beatch slapped one of his faithful, who happens to be one of our own lenr forum brothers. Let's light the torches and head to his quarantine headquarters in Milan, Frankenstein style, and bring this lowlife to justice!

Sam July 28, 2020 at 1:02 PM

Hello DR Rossi

I have a hard time getting

my head wrapped around

how you can have 10000

connections in one SKL.

Can you give some kind

of picture how this is possible?

Regards

Sam

1. Translate Andrea Rossi July 28, 2020 at 2:16 PM

   Sam:

   No

   Warm Regards,

   A.R.

I am not an expert but wave soldering is still useful for small volumes and prototypes. SMT is obviously more common for higher volume. Bga was particularly important for high connection density. Hand soldering of large numbers of connections, say 10000, is particularly effective for scammers.