Further reflection...
Team Google presented their $10 million ten year failure to replicate the original P and F experiment in their Nature article.
Counterpoint
Team Google has three contemporary solid state, dry cell CMNS patents in development. The latest patent developed under a DOE contract at LLNL and the lead inventor was the interim Director of the UC Berkeley Fusion program.
Question
Why the secrecy? Team Google obviously does not want to discuss their promising pursuit of CMNS energy technologies.
Challenge
Find one article or interview where anyone on Team Google discussed their patents or ongoing expanded research and solid state, high energy CMNS advanced technology development program.
Or
Stay stuck in the past spinning old tales and yarns about the first wet cells of cold fusion news Circa 1989.
Hundreds of grad students, undergraduate students, and doctoral students are working in CMNS solid state research at major universities. The majority are being paid to do so.
I doubt that any are interested in a replication of the 1989 P&F wet cell experiment. The important part of the wet cell is not the wet part of course. The interesting parts are the dry part inside the Palladium, and the plasma interface at the surface, where the atomic process are occuring. A wet cell electrolysis system has bubbles that collapse (cavitation), a plasma interface at the edge of the cathode, and a dry solid state environment within the cathode.
If the reason to attempt a replication of the boil off experiment is to sway SKEPTICS you have already failed. Your results will never be accepted.
I would rather study the works being done by students in advanced CMNS research programs at Universities and by Team Google at LLNL. The SKEPTICS on this thread have a negative influence on others who are trying to get up to date on the validity of cold fusion research Circa 2022.
Team Google surely likes people looking the other way... No?
