Electron-assisted fusion

  • Generally Gryzinski treats atoms effectively as oscillating electric multipoles.
    E.g. for one electron, if it's far we have dipole, when it passes nucleus the dipole is gone, and so on cyclically.
    For higher shells he gets oscillating electric dipoles, quadrupoles, octupoles - such effective picture allows him to get a good agreement for low energy scattering, e.g. in http://scitation.aip.org/conte…jcp/62/7/10.1063/1.430846


    If we would like to simulate LENR in this picture, I think we should use complete simulation for the single assisting electron: traveling back and forth between the two nuclei, and treat the rest of the large atom as oscillating electric multipole ... but I am far from being able to perform such simulations ...
    I am currently preparing to recreate the simulations for low energy p->H electron capture for Helbig-Evenhart above.


    Jarek is correct in that solitons play a central role in LENR. Superconductivity produces cooper pairs of electrons where the coulomb barrier is nullified. This indicates that LENR and superconductivity are like processes.


    Regarding solitons, this is only the way I see particles (and e.g. Faber) - not as some separate entities (still acting on EM field), but just special localized configurations of some field (solitons).
    For charges these are topological solitons, which are naturally quantized (only integer number), get attraction/repulsion if opposite/identical, can annihilate, pair create.
    It would be perfect if having a single field which family of "stable" structures correspond to our particle menagerie - a simple field seems to qualitatively do it.
    Essay: http://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Duda_elfld_1.pdf
    Slides: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12405967/soliton.pdf
    However, currently I don't see a need for some additional special solitons here (in superconductors there are fluxons/Abrikosov vortices: topological solitons nearly identical as I see spin or particles).


    223eV protons are able to "tunel" through the Li coulumb barrierer. Tunnels have two ends and who tells you that the Li core doesn't feel the approaching proton? An approaching proton induces pressure on the electrons which are coupled to the central charge. May be somebody should try to modell this process. and look at the induced perturbations.


    How do you know that there is no electron assistance here?
    Electron traveling between this nucleus and proton.

    QM assumes a "well shaped" probabilty cloud for electrons in the lattice. This works well for some calculations dealing with a few eV. But if there exist resonances, which live for a very short time, they wouldn't disturb the QM picture. Thus QM is no help for finding an explanatio


    I think about QM as equilibrium state (from Maximal Entropy Random Walk) - I agree that it has issues with dynamical situations like scattering or LENR.
    Gryzinski, who worked on scattering for half a century, was writing that QM is just terrible at predicting scattering, for example here is a picture from his book showing evolution of quantum predictions for ionization of atomic hydrogen with electrons:


    Further on, the halo nuclei paper showed (confirms!!) that the range of the nuclear force may reach at least 7fm! ( for up to seconds!)
    Conclusion: Our knowlege has deep holes. We just know the steady state, nothing about the intrinsic dynamics.


    Indeed the halo nuclei are very interesting entities.
    I have some intuitions from the soliton particle model I consider (essay above) - so spin is like Abrikosov vortex there - it is nearly 1D structure and nucleons are small torii around this vortex (like beads on a necklace) - this vortex can make loop on a larger distance (like these 7fm).


    Indeed understanding the nuclear part of LENR is also a big (even much bigger) challenge, but we should start with understanding how nuclei could get so close - crossing the Coulomb barrier, for which assistance of electron seems necessary.

  • Indeed understanding the nuclear part of LENR is also a big (even much bigger) challenge, but we should start with understanding how nuclei could get so close - crossing the Coulomb barrier, for which assistance of electron seems necessary.


    Since strange matter has been detected in LENR, there is the possibility that EMF reacts with the strong and weak forces to produce hadron decay. This decay of protons and neutrons would produce Kaons as has been observed in experimentation. You got to beleive in experimental results no matter how weird.

  • Regarding strange matter, indeed these are much heavier than standard hadrons - I really doubt you could get them in 1000K.


    Regarding proton decay, this is a very interesting hypothetical possibility ... but again not for LENR - it would release GeV-scale energy, and so huge cascade of high energy particles - easily going through the thin lead shielding.
    Theoretically proton decay would allow for complete matter->energy conversion (E=mc^2), which is ~100 times more than fusion, from any kind of matter - learning to stimulate it would give us an ultimate energy source, very helpful e.g. for traveling to other solar systems.
    One question is if it is even possible - so baryogenesis needed it to create more matter than antimatter, hypothetical Hawking radiation convert baryons into photons, many particle models require possibility of violating baryon number (also as topological soliton - electric charge is guarded by the Gauss law, but there is no something like this for baryon number).
    These are really extreme conditions, so if it is possible, we should expect it e.g. in the center of neutron star ... not in room temperature water pool as they were searching for it.
    Another question is if it could be stimulated - available not only by just bringing to extreme conditions, but also by some very subtle e.g. x-ray pulse to get baryon out of its local energy minimum - this question is a great motivation for searching for really good models of baryons and nuclei.

  • Regarding proton decay, this is a very interesting hypothetical possibility ... but again not for LENR - it would release GeV-scale energy, and so huge cascade of high energy particles - easily going through the thin lead shielding.


    Now what could invalidate this assertion.


    Well an energy storage mechanism might. If that energy generated from the decay of protons and neutrons somehow found its way into a long term energy storage method, then the power from the decay of the nucleons could be released over a long indeterminate timeframe.


    If there any evidence the such energy storage can occur? Well there might well be. Holmlid reports that he has detected muons coming from his "fuel" days and weeks after the laser that he uses to excitate his reaction has been switched off. He even reports that a florescent light in his lab produces muon creation of his "fuel" . Furthermore, Piantelli reports seeing a 6.7 MeV particle emitted from his nickel bar.


    There is also the possibility of energy conversion through thermalization where nuclear energy is transformed into heat. Also, Rossi reports substantial electron production where a almost equal part of his COP comes in the form of electron production. What is all those electrons are being produced from whole cloth. Electrons are a decay product of muons. Besides heat, Rossi also reports 50 KeV radiation observed coming from his reactor.


    Don't forget that the reported COP(200) of Rossi's Quark reactor has increased substantially since Rossi has switched to electrostatic reaction stimulation.


    In short, energy from proton decay can be converted to photons concurrently at many energy levels and particles of many kinds over a long timeframe after the LENR nuclear reaction has terminated which suggests a robust post reaction energy storage, conversion, and release mechanism.

  • A Bose condinsate can store energy by converting energy to mass. A photon that enters a Bose condinsate acquires mass and slows down to walking speed. Any sublight particle has mass.


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    This might be called dark photons. There is a speculation in science that dark photons are the source of the dark matter seen in the universe. There is evidence that galaxies are clothed in huge Bose condensation. All the photons in those galaxies aquire mass. This process would produce a huge amount of mass from these dark photons that exist inside the galaxy wide Bose condensates.

  • These are eV-scale photons in a very special (superfluid) medium, here we are talking about MeV-scale photons in standard solid matter (it has eV-scale phonons, excitons, plasmons etc.) - we know how such photons behave, the only reasonable way to "store them" is in nuclei (isomers) or other nuclear reactions.

  • These are eV-scale photons in a very special (superfluid) medium, here we are talking about MeV-scale photons in standard solid matter (it has eV-scale phonons, excitons, plasmons etc.) - we know how such photons behave, the only reasonable way to "store them" is in nuclei (isomers) or other nuclear reactions.


    IMHO, photons can be stored in a Bose condinsate of Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) that populate a polariton based spin wave formed on the surface of a superconducting metalized hydride particle.


    Here is what EMF looks like inside a polarion



    Here is depicted the wave pattern of the EMF confined in a dark mode Polariton



    (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) The cross-sectional views of the electrical field Exdistribution of the plasmonic whispering-gallery mode with the different azimuthal number (m = 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) for the cavity with radius r = 5 nm and chemical potential μc = 0.9 eV.


    From


    https://www.osapublishing.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-22-5-5754&id=281259
    Surface-plasmon-polariton whispering-gallery mode analysis of the graphene monolayer coated InGaAs nanowire cavity

  • A Bose condinsate can store energy by converting energy to mass. A photon that enters a Bose condinsate acquires mass and slows down to walking speed. Any sublight particle has mass.


    I guess a bose-condensate is efficient in dissipating/distributing energy. At 2.3 pm per Proton/Deuteron a large chunk of energy is missing! (Not stored!)


    Form me the "Low-energy nuclear reactions and the leptonic monopole Georges Lochak, Leonid Urutskoev" paper is closer to reality, than everything mentioned above!

  • I guess a bose-condensate is efficient in dissipating/distributing energy. At 2.3 pm per Proton/Deuteron a large chunk of energy is missing! (Not stored!)


    Form me the "Low-energy nuclear reactions and the leptonic monopole Georges Lochak, Leonid Urutskoev" paper is closer to reality, than everything mentioned above!


    The SPP is a analog leptonic monopole.


    See


    Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles


    http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf

    Quote

    Monopoles are magnetic charges, point-like sources of magnetic field. Contrary to electric charges they are absent in Maxwell’s equations and have never been observed as fundamental particles. Quantum fluids such as spinor Bose-Einstein condensates have been predicted to show monopoles in the form of excitations combining phase and spin topologies. Thanks to its unique spin structure and the direct optical control of the fluid wavefunction, an ideal system to experimentally explore this phenomenon is a condensate of exciton-polaritons in a semiconductor microcavity. We use this system to create half-solitons, non-linear excitations with mixed spin-phase geometry. By tracking their trajectory, we demonstrate that half-solitons behave as monopoles, magnetic charges accelerated along an effective magnetic field present in the microcavity. The field-induced spatial separation of half-solitons of opposite charges opens the way to the generation of magnetic currents in a quantum fluid.

  • Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles


    http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf


    Monopoles are magnetic charges, point-like sources of magnetic field. Contrary to electric charges they are absent in Maxwell’s equations and have never been observed as fundamental particles.


    Behave like is different to be a monopole!! The guessed energies for a 'real' magnetic monopole are multi MeV up to GeV.


    these people claim to see monopoles!
    What do you think about this: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf

  • Quote

    http://www.svn.net/krscfs/Permittivity Transitions.pdf


    PERMITTIVITY TRANSITIONS by Ken Shoulders


    One of the amazing accomplishments of Ken Shoulders is this experiment including photos of the life cycle of Surface Plasmon Polariton creation, transformation, and termination.


    On page 4, Ken Shoulder(KS) captures the creation of a SPP just after a spark discharge. Shoulders calls the bright mode SPP a White EV, and a dark mode SPP a Dark EV.


    For a description of dark and bright mode SPP's see


    Quote

    https://www.osapublishing.org/…=oe-22-13-16112&id=294258


    Determination of the absorption and radiative decay rates of dark and bright plasmonic modes


    One amazing finding that Ken Shoulders demonstrated was element transmutation just through the action of spark discharge...no hydrogen...no transition metal...just a spark.


    This LENR mechanism can be attributed to the production of nanoparticles from the condensation of the metal vapor from electrode material heated by the spark. SPPs form on the surface of these nanoparticles in the interface layer between the metal and the air, a dielectric.


    The SPPs follow the spark path and as KS shows first form a bright mode SPP. This bright mode SPP then transforms into a Dark mode SPP which stores energy in a Bose condinsate which results in the generation of a monopole magnetic flux lines.


    The bright mode SPP shows dipole activity, but the dark mode SPP shows little of no dipole activity, but as KS found, Dark mode SPP produces a monopole magnetic field.


    Quote

    Unidirectional Current Flow:


    Under the conditions of white and black EV looping as stated above, there is an electrical peculiarity worth noting. The current flows in only the white EV direction thus giving the basic conditions for magnetic field generation without closing the current loop. The return charge flows around the other half of the loop without being registered in our instruments. This might be the basis for predicting something like a magnetic monopole.


    The Dark mode SPP is typified by the onset of a condensation of polaritons to form a polariton BEC which acts like a EMF black hole. This BEC comprises both electrons and photons in an entangled state.


    The decay of the Dark mode soliton produces a shower of ions as picture 5 shows.


    The Lochak monopole is produced by spark discharge in like fashion to KS's EV solitons, but since the spark occurs in water. a spark based cavitation process generates a water crystal, the particle type that hosts the SPP is comprised of metalized water and condensed titanium vapor.


    As a SPP BEC whose energy storage capacity is huge, the monopole analog that this BEC simulates is multi MeV up to GeV in energy capacity.

  • Not in the billion dollar realm, but very much a particle accelerator.


    Similar kind of "accelerator" is currently used in Dense Plasma Focus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dense_plasma_focus
    Nice animation and explanation:

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    Gryzinski's group has been working on similar approach to fusion since 1957 (they say they have started it), here is article about their group (in Polish, but lots of pictures): http://web.archive.org/web/201…umenty/ptj/sadowski10.pdf
    Some their article: http://jphys.journaldephysique…hys_1982__43_5_715_0.html
    E.g. prototype of coaxial plasma gun (1958-60), both anode and cathode are multiple rods:

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.