QuoteUnlike you I have no views one way or the other on this, except that there cannot be a contest over an agreement which based on an 'illusion'. So if the contest goes ahead for the distance, it will not be over something which is 'not there'.
Sorry Frank, but I think you must be logically wrong here.
If Rossi claims there is no "illusion" and Rossi insists there is, a context will be needed to ascertain the truth? That is compatible with the matter being an "illusion".