Roger keeps pounding away.
You should have labeled this post NSFW.
Roger keeps pounding away.
You should have labeled this post NSFW.
New puppets: "Irina", "Joel".
And for the record, the picture of the NGU-thing was taken in Via Ezio No. 24 in Rome, the Italian address of his wife.
I'm looking around for info on the use of metal decay using the low voltage to power a rotating elecctro magnet to push electrons in a wire= for some math.. Anything out there..
For the point..
this can be a very, very large answer, which I have realized as I began to build a website explaining this very subject only a few days ago. But I shall try to cover the basics here, in simple and understandable terms, while retaining as much accuracy as possible.
Electrons have a negative charge. Because like charges repel each other, when an electron gets close to another electron, they will tend to keep their distance.
A magnet is composed of millions of electrons all orbiting their own atoms, just like any other material. What makes a magnet unique, though, is that all of these electrons are orbiting the same direction.
Because of this, the tiny negative charge produced by an electron is ‘amplified’ because of the surrounding charges, and produces a magnetic field; in essence, though, a magnetic field is much like the tiny negative charge of an electron.
So, let’s go inside a generator now. The shaft has many magnets on it that are being spun around and around at a rate of approximately 12,000 RPM (depending on the generator; obviously most generators will not be spinning at any given speed),
and surrounding the magnets are stationary coils of copper wire. This wire is full of electrons, as is any material, but copper has the ability found in many metals to easily transfer an electron from one atom to the next.
So if we get a close look at the inside if the wire, a magnet is getting close at an extraordinary rate. The electrons closest to the magnet begin to be pushed away by the magnetic field, and so they ‘jump’ from their orbit into the orbits surrounding nearby atoms.
Here is where things get interesting.
A copper atom can only easily retain so many electrons. So when an electron forces it’s way in, it also forces an electron out. This electron, too, has to go somewhere, so it hops into the next atom over, pushing yet another electron out. This process continues at an
astounding speed of 186,000 miles per second, which is almost unfathomable. To give you an idea of the speed, it could go around the planet Earth approximately 7.75 times every second.
These electrons all travel to the end of their wire and begin to build up. The copper atoms throughout the wire are now holding extra electrons, and they all need somewhere to go. The generator with the coils of wire might be miles away from your home, but the wires
in your walls are basically just the other end of the generator coils. You take your lamp and plug it into a receptacle, and all of those frantic electrons jump into the copper plug, run a
circuit through the light bulb and experience some extreme resistance, emitting light in the process. Then they continue on to what is called a ground rod, which allows the electrons to flow freely into the earth.
I am looking for the rotation speeds distances of the manetic rotation to the open wire and the need expatiation area needed to fill the wire before it will jump to a gap ground,.
You have it backwards. When an electron moves in a magnetic field there is a force on it. The force is at right angles to both the direction of the electron and the magnetic field. If the electron moves in the direction of the magnetic field the force is zero. The trick in generator design is to have the electrons move at right angles to the magnetic field.
Magnetic fields don't act like like electric fields. They form closed loops. Electric fields don't. Also, magnetic fields can be twisted up until they snap into simpler lower energy configurations.
You might benefit from reading about the Hall Effect. Also, study Faraday's Law.
One for Axil.
Symmetric monoidal functors from the cobordism category correspond to topological quantum field theories. The cobordism hypothesis for topological quantum field theories is the analogue of the Eilenberg–Steenrod axioms for homology theories. The Eilenberg–Steenrod axioms state that a homology theory is uniquely determined by its value for the point, so analogously what the cobordism hypothesis states is that a topological quantum field theory is uniquely determined by its value for the point. In other words, the bijection between �-valued symmetric monoidal functors and the objects of � is uniquely defined by its value for the point.
Symmetric monoidal functors from the cobordism category
You have it backwards. When an electron moves in a magnetic field there is a force on it. The force is at right angles to both the direction of the electron and the magnetic field. If the electron moves in the direction of the magnetic field the force is zero. The trick in generator design is to have the electrons move at right angles to the magnetic field.
Magnetic fields don't act like like electric fields. They form closed loops. Electric fields don't. Also, magnetic fields can be twisted up until they snap into simpler lower energy configurations.
You have it,
Now i know a few of you will understand it
The urRu arrive and use the Crystal to merge themselves and the Skeksis into the beings they once were: the angelic urSkeks.
Dr Rossi,
Reading the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
in paragraph 5 we understand in the algorythm of your process there is a reverse difference of Entropy, and this is a fact against the third principle of thermodynamic.
How do you reconcile this ? It is important to know, because the reverse difference of Entropy is the source of the Zero Point Energy.
Congratulations for your work,
All the best,
Maria
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for the 100,000 + readings of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
The algorythm of Researchgate registers all the readings, not accounting for repeated readings from the same source or the readings made by the author, so the number of 100000 readings is even more stunning, because absolutely genuine. It gives evidence of the increase of interest from the scientific echelons for the work of your team.
May God bless the work of your team,
Bedy
Martin:
1. yes
2. same algorythm
3. n.a.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giovanni:
Thjis will depend on the specific algorythm we will put in the control system: it is a possible function, though. Good suggestion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
1- 4: the algorythm is more complex, includes also your assumptions
5- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The control system can react to situations the algorythm has been designed for, not to situations that have not been foreseen. Therefore eventually the control system is updated. The parents of Technology are Trial and Error.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Steven N. Karesl:
the answer is yes, but within the control system algorythm.
Warm regards,
A.R.
the "Algorythm" is a "green" dance step invented by Al Gore in the 90's. It is danced to the tune of the Hokey Pokey.
"You do the Al Gore Rythm and you turn yourself around, that's what it's all about".
Display MoreDr Rossi,
Reading the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/pu…nge_particle_interactions
in paragraph 5 we understand in the algorythm of your process there is a reverse difference of Entropy, and this is a fact against the third principle of thermodynamic.
How do you reconcile this ? It is important to know, because the reverse difference of Entropy is the source of the Zero Point Energy.
Congratulations for your work,
All the best,
Maria
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for the 100,000 + readings of
http://www.researchgate.net/pu…nge_particle_interactions
The algorythm of Researchgate registers all the readings, not accounting for repeated readings from the same source or the readings made by the author, so the number of 100000 readings is even more stunning, because absolutely genuine. It gives evidence of the increase of interest from the scientific echelons for the work of your team.
May God bless the work of your team,
Bedy
Martin:
1. yes
2. same algorythm
3. n.a.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giovanni:
Thjis will depend on the specific algorythm we will put in the control system: it is a possible function, though. Good suggestion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
1- 4: the algorythm is more complex, includes also your assumptions
5- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The control system can react to situations the algorythm has been designed for, not to situations that have not been foreseen. Therefore eventually the control system is updated. The parents of Technology are Trial and Error.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Steven N. Karesl:
the answer is yes, but within the control system algorythm.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Sorry, but being a life-long space-nut - I've got to post this...
Wilfried has a good eye. One can compare fake and real CE marks here:
(Down a bit)
The CE certification for most products or imports is simply a self written confirmation that the product meets EU regulations ("declaration of conformity"). However, for certain products and certain safety standards you have to let a so called "notified body" examine the product and write the declaration of conformity. The E-Cat would certainly be such product. The CE mark would then have a four digit identification number of that body.
The CE marking like the Ecat itself is certainly a fake.
For all those people who like to wave around the D-K Effect...