Rends - I see you have found all the proof you need of Chinese "investment". With this standard of yours, the world should have been petroleum free a decade ago. One day I hope that someone can explain to you how things work at the regional level in China - lots of announcements, photo-ops, bill boards, signs, hooplah, noise.... I could go on but won't.
The Playground
-
-
On what occasion was the below attached presentation used?
-
... "Ahi is on a mission for Planet Rossi"
I always wanted to strike gold
-
Quote
super Kadmon Reactor
LOL. High probability that this super reactor works compared with any Rossi's masterpiece.
-
"lots of announcements, photo-ops, bill boards, signs, hooplah, noise..."
-
On what occasion was the below attached presentation used?
Isn't that the presentation that was attached to an e-mail sent to or from Darden in August/September 2015? I remember seeing it mentioned in one of the court documents but couldn't find it again...
-
Josh - there is no Chinese investment - period. Pull yourself from the Planet Rossi kool-aid funnel - you're starting to bloat.
I'm not drinking the kool-aid anymore, Dewey. I remember seeing it in the documents but might be mistaken. How do you define "investment" here? Do you mean investment in IH? Or investment in Ni-H technology? Or investment in LENR?
-
Isn't that the presentation that was attached to an e-mail sent to or from Darden in August/September 2015? I remember seeing it mentioned in one of the court documents but couldn't find it again...
The document I uploaded above is missing two slides (11 and 12) that the one sent to Darden probably had.
I suspect that the missing slides are the most interesting ones.
-
Speaking of amounts obtained by IH, from the article:
We really need someone with OCD to clear up the question of how much IH raised from various parties. My guess: not anything even close to the $250 million claimed by ele, except possibly in assurances.
If only we had a person of recognized and marked intelligence that would AND could take on this task--- so we could link to his blog Because some folks are not allowed in the house because reasons. Who would such a person be?
-
If you Planet Rossi types had only paid 1/100th of this kind of attention to Rossi's details over the past 5 years then his charade would have been exposed years ago. Oh wait......
-
True... But then they didn't bestow 11.5 Large on the guy
-
-
The document I uploaded above is missing two slides (11 and 12) that the one sent to Darden probably had.
Where did you get these slides? Do you remember where in the court documents the Chinese presentation e-mail attachment is mentioned?
-
They're also available here:
http://chinauspark.com/merchantcon.aspx?id=812
Google translation
I don't remember where the presentation was discussed in the court documents but I recall that the subject was brought out recently (a few weeks ago) on E-CatWorld. The slides aren't anything new, they've been already posted and discussed a couple years ago.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015…eat-slideshow-cobraf-com/
* * *
On a related note: 2013-09-23, JT Vaughn to Darden. Maybe this is where Rossi's 200M$ claim came from:
http://coldfusioncommunity.net…loads/2017/01/0214.22.pdf
[...]
-
... "If you Planet Rossi types had only paid 1/100th of this kind of attention to Rossi's details over the past 5 years ... "
Cheers from "Planet X"
-
-
Ahi - China has not tested any IH reactors. Combining a lie with a Bible verse doesn't help your cred schema scheme.
-
Italian lawyer -It is evident that you are not a lawyer. Rossi took $10M in exchange for rights to his invention. He did not deliver and now doesn't get to claim
harm as a result of being paid and not delivering. Planet Rossi law schools are as bad as Planet Rossi physics, science, logic, rhetoric, history, math, and etc, etc etc...
Moved from RVD2 - reason - personal attack more suited to this space and subject of a complaint made to moderators. Alan.
-
@Planet IH: Why do you conduct such intense discussions about a scammer and a scam-product?
Either AR has something, what in your eyes is highly unlikely, or he will fade away as all the other scammers too. Discussing about the bear-skin (Quark-X, Yoghurt-Y, Bifidus-Z, etc..) before we even know that there is one is silly and unprofessional.
Please just wait for end of May and the mfp results of ecco/Me356 tests. Then we can restart the discussion about who owns the tools...
Ni-Li-H-LENR will grow up - but most likely outside IH! --> only IH wastes time..and reputation.
So why don't you just follow your own advise and keep quiet?
Moved from the Rossi v. Darden thread. Eric
-
Quote
I agree. I gues 3 times could come from error in measuring input energy and 3 times from error in measuring output. But I still find it very strange if IH would have measured this much wrong.
It does seem like a large error but consider that the power output is inferred from a temperature measurement using a formula which varies power as the FOURTH POWER of the temperature! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan%E2%80%93Boltzmann_law
A factor of three is not large when error in power is determined to vary as the fourth power of error in temperature. Try some calculations.
IMO, Rossi chose radiated power measurement instead of the much easier forced cooling with a fluid, specifically to introduce and large and to him, controllable error in the measurement. And I am wiling to bet he tested all methods of promoting this error including the emissivity errors documented by others (for example Clarke in various forum posts before he got disgusted with the censorship and ridicule and left).
In addition, Rossi forbade any attempt to do a proper calibration over the operating temperature range using made up and absurd excuses. In fact Rossi ridiculed demands for calibration in ALL of the tests in which he participated going back to his early ecat demos and Levi's NyTeknik report in 2011.
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.