That is a valid concern. I see no engineer stamp on it, or a signature.
Maybe, not being certified in the USA, Penon could not legally put his stamp on the report.
Para, All,
Why you guys keep fueling irrelevant, almost obsolete discussions is beyond me.
This trial is not about a missing signature or a wrongly placed camera. It is about two parties that fight over what they believe is the valuable IP of a new, still controversial technology. This case would not have its current proportions if it all were a scam.
The Rossi / IH cooperation was not successful and the trial will decide on what terms they divorce. That's it.
You and your buddies can spent an endless amount of time inventing, debating and following useless leads (here are some new ones; Did Rossi have a non-compete as "Chief Inventor" at IH? Is Rossi entitled to damages because IH put his health at risk by all the demanded tests?, etc.) , but if you cannot send somebody a fat invoice, it will not bring you anything. Moreover, IHFB is not only debunking all the FUD, he is making you all look like a bunch of kids that want to have the last say. Every post, every reply is taking you and your comrades further onto the sticky mud plains of desperation land.
The judge will after a jury verdict decide how to divide the estate and determine the height of the alimentation. Apart from the expected appeals, the outcome of the trial, the trial costs and reputation damage will determine who outsmarted who.
Cheers,
JB