Display Morekev
Why is WWs credibility in question?
He is who he says he is, behaves just as you'd expect and experienced retiring lawyer to behave.
That does not mean he is a saint, or known unbiased, or always correct, but we have zero evidence he is biased, and unlike most here he is looking at stuff from a more distant viewpoint. That means he is highly credible.
Unlike, for example, SSC and Ele who repeat easily contradicted Rossi propaganda the whole time. Yet you don't say they are not credible?
I didn't start the question of WW's credibility, someone else did upthread. Ask them why.
I furthered the issue because he's been using his legal background to lend credence to his viewpoint, but he doesn't answer questions put to him and gets evasive when he does answer.